Buck the establishment: Reinventing sister chromatid cohesion

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 507-513

  Skibbens, Robert V ^a  

^a LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHESIN;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; HUMAN; MITOSIS; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SISTER CHROMATID;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIDS; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; HUMANS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 77956182276     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Skibbens R.V. Mechanisms of sister chromatid pairing. Int. Rev. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2008, 269:283-339.
2. Skibbens R.V., et al. Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery. Genes Dev. 1999, 13:307-319.
3. Toyoda Y., et al. Requirement of chromatid cohesion proteins rad21/scc1 and mis4/scc2 for normal spindle-kinetochore interaction in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:347-358.
4. Maresca T.J., Salmon E.D. Welcome to a new kind of tension: translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:825-835.
5. Sjögren C., Nasmyth K. Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:991-995.
6. Unal E., et al. DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister-chromatid cohesion through Eco1 (Ctf7). Science 2007, 317:245-248.
7. Ström L., et al. Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break. Science 2007, 317:242-245.
8. Heidinger-Pauli J.M., et al. The kleisin subunit of cohesin dictates damage-induced cohesion. Mol. Cell 2008, 31:47-56.
9. Heidinger-Pauli J.M., et al. Distinct targets of the Eco1 acetyltransferase modulate cohesion in S phase and in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:311-321.
10. Watrin E., Peters J.M. Human Scc4 is required for cohesin binding to chromatin, sister-chromatid cohesion, and mitotic progression. EMBO J. 2009, 28:2625-2635.
11. Kim B.J., et al. Genome-wide reinforcement of cohesin binding at pre-existing cohesin sites in response to ionizing radiation in human cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:22784-22792.
12. Zou H., et al. Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis. Science 1999, 285:418-422.
13. Ryu B., et al. Comprehensive expression profiling of tumor cell lines identifies molecular signatures of melanoma progression. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e594.
14. Skibbens R.V., et al. Role of chromosome segregation genes in BRCA1-dependent lethality. Cell Cycle 2008, 7:2071-2072.
15. Tanaka K., et al. DDX1 is required for testicular tumorigenesis, partially through the transcriptional activation of 12p stem cell genes. Oncogene 2009, 28:2142-2151.
16. Krantz I.D., et al. Cornelia de Lange syndrome is caused by mutations in NIPBL, the human homolog of Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:631-635.
17. Tonkin E.T., et al. NIPBL, encoding a homolog of fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins and fly Nipped-B, is mutated in Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:636-641.
18. Musio A., et al. X-linked Cornelia de Lange syndrome owing to SMC1L1 mutations. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:528-530.
19. van der Lelij P., et al. Warsaw breakage syndrome, a cohesinopathy associated with mutations in XPD helicase family member DDX11/ChlR1. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 86:262-266.
20. Skibbens R.V., et al. Cohesins coordinate gene transcriptions of related function within Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:1601-1606.
21. Dorsett D. Roles of the sister chromatid cohesion apparatus in gene expression, development, and human syndromes. Chromosoma 2007, 116:1-13.
22. Gard S., et al. Cohesinopathy mutations disrupt the subnuclear organization of chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187:455-462.
23. +/- mouse, a model of Cornelia de Lange Syndrome. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000650.
24. Wendt K.S., Peters J.M. How cohesin and CTCF cooperate in regulating gene expression. Chromosome Res. 2009, 17:201-214.
25. Rankin S., et al. Sororin, a substrate of the anaphase-promoting complex, is required for sister chromatid cohesion in vertebrates. Mol. Cell 2005, 18:185-200.
26. Schmitz J., et al. Sororin is required for stable binding of cohesin to chromatin and for sister chromatid cohesion in interphase. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:630-636.
27. Díaz-Martínez L.A., et al. Regulation of centromeric cohesion by sororin independently of the APC/C. Cell Cycle 2007, 6:714-724.
28. Ivanov D., et al. Eco1 is a novel acetyltransferase that can acetylate proteins involved in cohesion. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:323-328.
29. Skibbens R.V. Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:R1126-1132.
30. Zhang J., et al. Acetylation of Smc3 by Eco1 is required for S phase sister chromatid cohesion in both human and yeast. Mol. Cell. 2008, 31:143-151.
31. Ben-Shahar T.R., et al. Eco1-dependent cohesin acetylation during establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 2008, 321:563-566.
32. Unal E., et al. A molecular determinant for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 2008, 321:566-569.
33. Ström L., et al. Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:1003-1015.
34. Unal E., et al. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:991-1002.
35. Rowland B.D., et al. Building sister chromatid cohesion: smc3 acetylation counteracts an antiestablishment activity. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:763-774.
36. Sutani T., et al. Budding yeast Wpl1(Rad61)-Pds5 complex counteracts sister chromatid cohesion-establishing reaction. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:492-497.
37. Maradeo M.E., Skibbens R.V. The Elg1-RFC clamp-loading complex performs a role in sister chromatid cohesion. PLoS One 2009, 4:e4707.
38. Parnas O., et al. The ELG1 clamp loader plays a role in sister chromatid cohesion. PLoS One 2009, 4:e5497.
39. Hartman T., et al. Pds5p is an essential chromosomal protein required for both sister chromatid cohesion and condensation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 151:613-626.
40. Panizza S., et al. Pds5p cooperates with cohesin in maintaining sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10:1557-1564.
41. Tanaka K., et al. Establishment and maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion in fission yeast by a unique mechanism. EMBO J. 2001, 20:5779-5790.
42. Terret M.E., et al. Cohesin acetylation speeds the replication fork. Nature 2009, 462:231-234.
43. Shimada K., Gasser S.M. The origin recognition complex functions in sister-chromatid cohesion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 2007, 128:85-99.
44. Chang C.R., et al. Targeting of cohesin by transcriptionally silent chromatin. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:3031-3042.
45. Baetz K.K., et al. The ctf13-30/CTF13 genomic haploinsufficiency modifier screen identifies the yeast chromatin remodeling complex RSC, which is required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24:1232-1244.
46. Huang J., et al. The RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex is required for Cohesin's association with chromosome arms. Mol. Cell 2004, 13:739-750.
47. Suter B., et al. The origin recognition complex links replication, sister chromatid cohesion and transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2004, 167:579-591.
48. Skibbens R.V., et al. Fork it over: the cohesion establishment factor Ctf7p and DNA replication. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120:2471-2477.
49. Moldovan G.L., et al. PCNA controls establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase. Mol. Cell 2006, 23:723-732.
50. Skibbens R.V. Holding your own: establishing sister chromatid cohesion. Genome Res. 2000, 10:1664-1671.
51. Haering C.H., et al. Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol. Cell 2002, 9:773-788.
52. Tóth A., et al. Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p(Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication. Genes Dev. 1999, 13:320-333.
53. Milutinovich M., et al. A multi-step pathway for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:e12.
54. Bernard P., et al. Cell-cycle regulation of cohesin stability along fission yeast chromosomes. EMBO J. 2008, 27:111-121.
55. Ciosk R., et al. Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol. Cell 2000, 5:243-254.
56. McIntyre J., et al. In vivo analysis of cohesin architecture using FRET in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 2007, 26:3783-3793.
57. Sakai A., et al. Condensin but not cohesin SMC heterodimer induces DNA reannealing through protein-protein assembly. EMBO J. 2003, 22:2764-2775.
58. Surcel A., et al. Cohesin interaction with centromeric minichromosomes shows a multi-complex rod-shaped structure. PLoS One 2008, 3:e2453.
59. Haering C.H., et al. The cohesin ring concatenates sister DNA molecules. Nature 2008, 454:297-301.
60. Ghosh S.K., et al. Yeast cohesin complex embraces 2 micron plasmid sisters in a tri-linked catenane complex. Nucl. Acids Res. 2009, 38:570-584.
61. Lengronne A., et al. Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion at the S. cerevisiae replication fork. Mol. Cell 2006, 23:787-799.