Acting on (bodily) experience

Psyche

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 82-99

  Smith, Adrian John Tetteh ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956064867     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1039723X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ballard, D., Hayhoe, M., Pook, P., & Rao, R. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 723-767.
2. Bermudez, J. L. (1998). The paradox of self consciousness. Cambridge Mass., London: MIT Press.
3. Bermudez, J. L. (2005). The phenomenology of bodily awareness. In D. Woodruff Smith, & A. Thomasson (Eds.), Phenomenology and philosophy of mind (pp. 295-316). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
5. Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139-159.
6. Clark, A. (2001). Visual experience and motor action: Are the bonds too tight? Philosophical Review, 110 (4), 495-519.
7. Coello, Y., & Delevoye-Turrel, Y. (2007). Embodiment, spatial categorisation and action. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 667-683.
8. Cole, J. (1995). Pride and a daily marathon. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
9. Cole, J. (2005). On the relation of the body image to sensation and its absence. In H. De Preester, & V. Knockaert (Eds.), Body image and body schema: Interdisciplinary perspectives on the body (pp. 311-328). John Benjamins.
10. Cole, J., & Paillard, J. (1995). Living without touch and peripheral information about body position and movement: Studies with deafferented subjects. In J. L. Bermudez, A. Marcel, & N. Eilan (Eds.), The body and the self (pp. 245-266). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
11. Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 655-666.
12. Craig, A. D. (2003). Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 500-505.
13. Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11 (4), 423-31.
14. de Vignemont, F., Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2006). Body mereology. In G. Knoblich, I. M. Thornton, M. Grosjean, & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), Human body perception from the inside out (pp. 147-170). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Dijkerman, H. C., & de Haan, E. H. (2007). Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 30, 189-239.
16. di Pellegrino, G., Làdavas, E., & Farnè, A. (1997). Seeing where your hands are. Nature, 380, 730.
17. Eilan, N., Marcel, A., & Bermudez, J. L. (1995). Self-consciousness and the body: An interdisciplary introduction. In J. L. Bermudez, A. Marcel, & N. Eilan (Eds.), The Body and the self (pp. 1-29). Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
18. Eramudugolla, R., Irvine, D. R., McAnally, K. I., Martin, R. L., & Mattingley, J. B. (2005). Directed attention eliminates "Change Deafness" in complex auditory scenes. Current Biology, 15, 1108-1113.
19. Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Evans, G. (1985). Molyneux's Question. In The collected papers of Gareth Evans. London: Oxford University Press.
21. Farnè, A., & Làdavas, E. (2000). Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport, 85, 1645-1649.
22. Farnè, A., Bonifazi, S., & Làdavas, E. (2005a). The role played by tool use and tool length in the plastic elongation of peri-hand space: A single-case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22 (3/4), 408-418.
23. Farnè, A., Demattè, M. L., & Làdavas, E. (2005b). Neuropsychological evidence of modular organization of the near peripersonal space. Neurology, 65, 1754-1758.
24. Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Luppino, G., Matelli, M., & Rizzolati, G. (1996). Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (Area F4). Journal of Neurophysiology, 76 (1), 141-157.
25. Gallace, A., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2006). The failure to detect tactile change: A tactile analogue of change blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 300-303.
26. Gallagher, S. (2003). Bodily self-awareness and object-perception. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum: International Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies 7: 53-68
27. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
28. Graziano, M. S., & Gross, C. G. (1994). The representation of extrapersonal space: A possible role for bimodal, visual-tactile neurons. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1021-1034). Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
29. Grush, R. (2007). Skill theory v.2.0: Dispositions, emulation, and spatial perception. Synthese, 159 (3), 389-416.
30. Haggard, P., Taylor-Clarke, M., & Kennett, S. (2003). Tactile perception, cortical representation and the bodily self. Current Biology, 13, R170-R173.
31. Holmes, N. P., & Spence, C. (2004). The body schema and multi-sensory representations of peripersonal space. Cognitive Processes, 5, 94-105.
32. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport, 7, 2325-2330.
33. Kinsbourne, M. (1995). Awareness of one's own body: An attentional theory of its nature, development, and brain basis. In J. Bermudez, A. Marcel, & N. Eilan (Eds.), The body and the self (pp. 205-223). MIT Press.
34. Kinsbourne, M. (2002). The brain and body awareness. In T. Pruzinsky & T. Cash (Eds.), Body images: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice (pp. 22-39). New York: Guilford.
35. Lackner, J. R. (1988). Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain, 111 (2), 281-297.
36. Lackner, J. R., & DiZio, P. (1984). Some efferent and somatosensory influences on body orientation and oculomotor control. In L. Spillman, & B. R. Wooten (Eds.), Sensory experience, adaptation and perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Lackner, J. R., & DiZio, P. (1992). Gravitoinertial force level affects the appreciation of limb position during muscle vibration. Brain Research, 592 (1-2), 175-180.
38. Làdavas, E. (2002). Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 17-22.
39. Làdavas, E., Farnè, A., Zeloni, G., & di Pellegrino, G. (2000). Seeing or not seeing where your hands are. Experimental Brain Research, 131, 458-467.
40. Legrand, D., Brozzoli, C., Rosetti, Y., & Farne, A. (2007). Close to me: multisensory space representations for action and pre-reflexive consciousness of oneself-in-the-world. Consciousness and Cognition, 16 (3), 687-699.
41. Maravita, A., & Iriki, A. (2004). Tools for the body(schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (2), 79-86.
42. Marcel, A.J. (2003). The Sense of Agency: Awareness and Ownership of Action. In J. Roessler & N. Eilan (Eds.) Agency and Self-awareness: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology (pp. 48-93) (2003) Oxford University Press.
43. Mattingley, J. B., Driver, J., Beschin, N., & Robertson, I. H. (1997). Attentional competition between modalities: Extinction between touch and vision after right hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia, 35, 867-880.
44. Noe, A. (ed.) (2002). Is the visual world a grand illusion?. Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.
45. O'Shaughnessy, B. (1995). Proprioception and the body image. In J. L. Bermudez, A. Marcel, & N. Eilan (Eds.), The body and self (pp. 175-205). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
46. Paillard, J. (2005). Vectorial versus configural encoding of body space: A neural basis for a distinction between body schema and body image. In H. De Preester, & V. Knockaert (Eds.), Body image and body schema: Interdisciplinary perspectives on the body (pp. 89-111). John Benjamins.
47. Pouget, A., & Sejnowski, T. (1997). Spatial transformations in the parietal cortex using basis functions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 (2), 222-237.
48. Pouget, A., & Snyder, L. H. (2000). Computational approaches to sensorimotor transformations. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1192-1198.
49. Spence, C., Pavani, F., Maravita, A., & Holmes, N. P. (2004). Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Journal of Physiology, 98 (1-3), 171-189.
50. Todes, S. (1963/2001). Body and world. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
51. Tononi, G., & Edelman, G.M. (1998). Consciousness and the integration of information in the brain. Advances in Neurology, 77, 245-279.
52. Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement Neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212-1217.