The relation between EA effectiveness and stakeholder satisfaction

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 83, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1954-1969

  Van Der Raadt, Bas ^a   Bonnet, Marc ^b   Schouten, Sander ^c   Van Vliet, Hans ^d  

^a Ernst and Young International Location Advisory Services   (Netherlands)

^b ACCENTURE   (United States)

^c CAPGEMINI   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Effectiveness; Enterprise Architecture; Organizational function; Satisfaction; Stakeholder perception

Indexed keywords

EFFECTIVENESS; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; ORGANIZATIONAL FUNCTIONS; SATISFACTION; STAKEHOLDER PERCEPTION;

INDUSTRY;

ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 77956063927     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.076     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. A.L. Pablo Determinants of acquisition integration level, a decision-making perspective The Academy of Management Journal 37 4 1994 803 836
2. B.L. Myers, L.A. Kappelman, and V.R. Prybutok A comprehensive model for assessing the quality and productivity of the information systems function: toward a theory for information systems assessment E.J. Garrity, G.L. Sanders, Information Systems Success Measurement, Idea Group Information Technology Management Series 1998 IGI Publishing Hershey, PA 94 121
3. G.A. Moore Strategy and your stronger hand Harvard Business Review 83 December (12) 2005 62 71
4. van der Raadt, B., Slot, R., van Vliet, H., 2007. Experience Report: Assessing a Global Financial Services Company on its Enterprise Architecture Effectiveness Using NAOMI, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii international Conference on System Sciences (HICSS07), January, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, p. 218b.
5. NASCIO, 2003. NASCIO Enterprise Architecture Maturity Model, Version 1.3, December. http://www.nascio.org/publications/documents/nascio-eamm.pdf.
6. US DoC, 2007. Enterprise Architecture Capability Maturity Model, Enterprise Architecture Program Support, United States Department of Commerce, Version: 1.2.
7. B. van der Raadt, J.F. Hoorn, and H. van Vliet Alignment and maturity are siblings in architecture assessment O. Pastor, J. Falcao e Cunha, CAiSE 2005 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 357 371
8. B. van der Raadt, and H. van Vliet Assessing the Efficiency of the Enterprise Architecture Function, Advances in Enterprise Engineering II (Proceedings Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation - PRET 2009) 2009 Springer pp. 63-83
9. B. van der Raadt, S. Schouten, and H. van Vliet Stakeholder perception of enterprise architecture R. Morrison, D. Balasubramaniam, K. Falkner, ECSA 2008, LNCS 5292 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 19 34
10. Hoorn, J.F., 2006. Software Requirements. Update, Upgrade, Redesign. Towards a Theory of Requirements Change, Ordina, Nieuwegein, NL.
11. B. van der Raadt, and H. van Vliet Designing the EA function S. Becker, F. Plasil, QoSA 2008 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 103 118
12. C. Perks, and T. Beveridge Guide to Enterprise IT Architecture 2003 Springer Verlag New York
13. J.W. Ross, P. Weill, and D.C. Robertson Enterprise Architecture as Strategy - Creating a Foundation for Business Execution 2006 Harvard Business School Press
14. P. Johnson, R. Lagerström, P. Närman, and M. Simonsson Enterprise architecture analysis with extended influence diagrams Journal Information Systems Frontiers 9 July (2-3) 2007 163 180
15. M. Simonsson,. Lindström, P. Johnson, L. Nordström, J. Grundbäck, and O. Wijnbladh Scenario-based evaluation of enterprise architecture - A Top-Down Approach for CIO Decision-Making Proceedings of the International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS05), May 2005 130 137
16. F.J. Armour, S.H. Kaisler, and S.Y. Liu A big-picture look at enterprise architectures IT Professional 1 January (1) 1999 35 42
17. M. Lankhorst Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis Second ed. 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg
18. K. Smolander, and T. Päivärinta Describing and Communicating Software Architecture in Practice: Observations on Stakeholders and Rationale A. Banks Pidduck, CAISE 2002 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 117 133
19. L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman Software Architecture in Practice 1998 Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
20. M. Pulkkinen, A. Naumenko, and K. Luostarinen Managing information security in a business network of machinery maintenance services business - enterprise architecture as a coordination tool Journal of Systems and Software 80 October (10) 2007 1607 1620
21. M. Boster, S. Liu, and R. Thomas Getting the most from your enterprise architecture IT Professional 2 July (4) 2000 43 50
22. W. Boh, and D. Yellin Using enterprise architecture standards in managing information technology Journal of Management Information Systems 23 3 2007 163 207
23. R. Peterson Crafting information technology governance Information Systems Management 21 4 2004 7 22
24. J. Gutman Means-end chains as goal hierarchies Psychology & Marketing 14 6 1997 545 560
25. . Lindström, P. Johnson, E. Johansson, M. Ekstedt, and M. Simonsson A survey on CIO concerns-do enterprise architecture frameworks support them? Information Systems Frontiers 8 2 2006 81 90
26. J.W. Ross, C. Beath, and D.L. Goodhue Develop long-term competitiveness Through IT assets Sloan Management Review 38 1 1996 31 45
27. V. Clerc, P. Lago, and H. van Vliet The architect's mindset S. Overhage, QoSA 2007 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 231 249
28. J. Schekkerman The Economic Benefits of Enterprise Architecture 2005 Trafford Publishing
29. M. Hoffman Analysis of the Current State of Enterprise Architecture Evaluation Methods and Practices Proceedings of The European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation (ECIME'07) Montpellier France, Academic Conferences Limited 2007 237 246
30. J. Zachman You can't cost-justify architecture DataToKnowledge Newsletter 29 3 2001
31. V.A. Zeithaml Service quality, profitability, and the economic worth of customers: what we know and what we need to learn Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 1 2000 67 85
32. J.M. Morganwalp, and A.P. Sage Enterprise architecture measures of effectiveness International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 4 1 2004 81 94
33. Buchanan, R., 2001. Assessing Enterprise Architecture Program Value. Part 2. META Group Report, Stamford, CT.
34. P.C. Nutt Types of organizational decision processes Administrative Science Quarterly 29 3 1984 414 450
35. V.A. Zeithaml, A. Parasuraman, and L.L. Berry Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations 1990 The Free Press New York, NY
36. R. Voss, T. Gruber, and I. Szmigin Service quality in higher education: the role of student expectations J Bus Res 2007
37. K.E. Weick The Social Psychology of Organizing 1979 Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Reading
38. G.D. Brewer Assessing outcomes and effects K.S. Cameron, D.A. Whetten, Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models 1983 Academic Press San Diego, CA
39. R.A. Bettis, and C.K. Prahalad The dominant logic: retrospective and extension Strategic Management Journal 16 1 1995 5 14
40. S.H. Kaisler, F. Armour, and M. Valivullah Enterprise architecting: critical problems Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '05) 2005 IEEE Computer Society Washington 224b
41. K.S. Cameron, and D.A. Whetten Organizational Effectiveness and Quality: The Second Generation, Higher education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. XI 1996 Agathon Press New York
42. J. Hoogervorst Enterprise architecture: enabling integration, agility and change International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 13 2004 213 233
43. J.C. Henderson, and N. Venkatraman Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations IBM Systems Journal 32 1993 4 16
44. J.N. Luftman, P.R. Lewis, and S.H. Oldach Transforming the Enterprise: the alignment of business and information technology strategies IBM Systems Journal 32 1 1993
45. J. Luftman Assessing Business-IT Alignment Maturity Communications of the Association of Information Systems 4 2000
46. E. Overby, A. Bharadwaj, and V. Sambamurthy A Framework for Enterprise Agility and the Enabling Role of Digital Options, Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion, vol. 180 2005 Springer Boston pp. 295-312
47. B. Sherehiy, W. Karwowski, and J.K. Layer A review of enterprise agility: concepts, frameworks and indicators International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37 5 2007 445 460
48. SEI, 2006. SCAMPI A, Version 1.2: Method Definition Document.
49. Bonnet, M., 2009. Measuring the Effectiveness of Enterprise Architecture Implementation. Master thesis, TU Delft.
50. T. Kamogawa, and H. Okada A framework for enterprise architecture effectiveness Proceedings of the International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management (ICSSSM '05) 2005 IEEE Computer Society 740 745