Experience report: Assessing a global financial services company on its enterprise architecture effectiveness using NAOMI

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Van Der Raadt, Bas ^a   Slot, Raymond ^a   Van Vliet, Hans ^b  

^a CAPGEMINI   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

BUSINESS ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE; FINANCIAL SERVICES; ORGANIZATIONAL MODELS;

FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 39749170696     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2007.217     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. B. van der Raadt, J. Soetendal, M. Perdeck, and H. van Vliet, "Polyphony in Architecture," Proceedings 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE2004), IEEE Computer Society, 2004, pp. 533-542.
2. META group, Architecture Maturity Audit. META group, March 2004.
3. Gartner Group, Architecture Maturity Assessment. Gartner Group, Stamfort, Connecticut, Nov. 2002.
4. The Department of Commerce Enterprise IT Architecture Advisory Group, IT Architecture Capability Maturity Model. Department of Commerce, USA, 2003.
5. OMB FEA Program Management Office, OMB Enterprise Architecture Assessment v1.0 Guidelines. The Office of Management and Budget, The Executive Office of the President, USA, 2004.
6. Federal Architecture Working Group, Architecture Alignment and Assessment Guide. The Federal Chief Information Officers Council, 2000
7. J.N. Luftman, "Assessing Business-IT Alignment Maturity," Communications of AIS. Vol. 4, Article No. 14. Association for Information Systems, 2000.
8. B. van der Raadt, J. F. Hoorn, H. van Vliet, "Alignment and Maturity Are Siblings in Architecture Assessment," Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 3520, Jan 2005, pp. 357-371.
9. B. van der Raadt, "NAOMI: Normalized Architecture Organisation Maturity Index,", Capgemini confidential whitepaper, version 0.10, May 2006.
10. L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman, Software Architecture in Practice. Addison Wesley, second edition, 2003.
11. D.A. Dillman, Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2nd ed.), John Wiley and Sons, 1999.
12. R. Likert, "A technique for the measurement of attitudes," Archives of Psychology, No. 14, 1932.
13. E.E. Rigdon, Structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research G. Marcoulides (ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1998, pp. 251-294.
14. J. F. Hoorn, M. E. Breuker, and E. Kok, Shifts in foci and priorities. Different relevance of requirements to changing goals yields conflicting prioritizations and is viewpoint-dependent, Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press, 2006.
15. D. Ahern, A. Clouse, and R. Turner, CMMI Distilled: A Practical Introduction to Integrated Process Improvement, Second Edition, Addison-Wesley, 2004.