Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: A five year follow-up study

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 783-787

  Pitto, Rocco P ^a,c   Hayward, Annabel ^a   Walker, Cameron ^b   Shim, Vickie B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c MIDDLEMORE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; CANCELLOUS BONE; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORTICAL BONE; DIAPHYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MALE; METAPHYSIS; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; RADIODIAGNOSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77956061979     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0884-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Digas G, Dorr Kaerrholm J Faugere 2008 Five-year DEXA study of 88 hips with cemented femoral stem. Int Orthop 10.1007/s00264-008-0699-4
2. LD Dorr MC Faugere AM Mackel TA Gruen B Bognar HH Malluche 1993 Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur Bone 14 231 242 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90146-2 8363862 1:STN:280:DyaK3szntFyltQ%3D%3D
3. CA Engh JD Bobyn AH Glassman 1987 Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 69 45 55 1:STN:280:DyaL2s7jslOrug%3D%3D
4. CE Gibbons AJ Davies AA Amis H Olearnik BC Parker JE Scott 2001 Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of differing design philosophy Int Orthop 25 89 92 10.1007/s002640100246 11409459 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzks1KksQ%3D%3D
5. R Huiskes H Weinans M Dalstra 1989 Adaptive bone remodelling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty Orthopedics 12 1255 1267 2798252 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FhslWisg%3D%3D
6. HJ Laine TJ Puolakka T Moilanen KJ Pajamaki J Wirta MU Lehto 2000 The effects of cementless femoral stem shape and proximal surface texture on 'fit-and-fill' characteristics and on bone remodeling Int Orthop 24 184 190 10.1007/s002640000150 11081837 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzgs1ajtg%3D%3D
7. A Leali JF Fetto 2004 Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem Int Orthop 28 151 154 10.1007/s00264-004-0554-1 15366198
8. F Martini S Sell E Kremling W Kusswetter 1996 Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems Int Orthop 20 218 221 10.1007/s002640050067 8872543 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2Fis1eltw%3D%3D
9. T Niinimaki J Junila P Jalovaara 2001 A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding Int Orthop 25 85 88 10.1007/s002640100241 11409458 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzks1KksA%3D%3D
10. S Pandit A Graydon WC Bradley J Munro RP Pitto 2006 CT-osteodensitometry in modern uncemented taper-design stem with hydroxyapatite coating Australia-NZ J of Surg 76 778 781 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03866.x
11. RP Pitto A Bhargava S Pandit C Walker JT Munro 2008 Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty Int Orthop 32 589 595 10.1007/s00264-007-0389- 7 17579860
12. RP Pitto L Mueller K Reilly R Schmidt J Munro 2007 Quantitative computer assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty Int Orthop 31 431 438 10.1007/s00264-006-0257-x 17043862 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2svitFSqsg%3D%3D
13. L Rosenthall JD Bobyn M Tanzer 1999 Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling Int Orthop 23 325 329 10.1007/s002640050383 10741515 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3gtlGmuw%3D%3D
14. J Sanchez-Sotelo DG Lewallen WS Harmsen J Harrington ME Cabanela 2004 Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem Int Orthop 28 206 210 10.1007/s00264-004-0558-x 15118841
15. R Schmidt TE Nowak L Mueller RP Pitto 2004 Osteodensitometry after total hip replacement with uncemented taper-design stem Int Orthop 28 74 77 10.1007/s00264-003-0519-9 15224163
16. R Schmidt RP Pitto A Kress C Ehremann TE Nowak U Reulbach R Forst L Muller 2005 Inter- and Intraobserver assessment of periacetabular osteodensitometry after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography Arch Ortho Trauma Surg 125 291 297 10.1007/s00402-005-0812-8
17. DF Scott WL Jaffe 1996 Host-bone response to porous-coated cobalt-chrome and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components in hip arthroplasty. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of paired bilateral cases at 5 to 7 years J Arthroplasty 11 429 437 10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80033-7 8792250 1:STN:280:DyaK28zosVelsA%3D%3D
18. V Shim RP Pitto RM Streicher PJ Hunter IA Anderson 2007 The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating FE models of the femur and pelvis J of Biomechanics 40 26 35 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.11.018
19. D Weber DL Pomeroy R Brown LA Schaper WE Badenhausen Jr W Smith JI Curry KE Suthers 2000 Proximally porous coated femoral stem in total hip replacement-5- to 13-year follow-up report Int Orthop 24 97 100 10.1007/s002640000115 10894379 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fislartw%3D%3D
20. B Zerahn GS Lausten IL Kanstrup 2004 Prospective comparison of differences in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems Int Orthop 28 146 150 10.1007/s00264-003-0534- x 14730398 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3oslSguw%3D%3D