Leaflet opening and closing dynamics of stentless bioprostheses

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 492-498

  Frost, Markus W ^a   Funder, Jonas A ^a   Klaaborg, Kaj Erik ^a   Wierup, Per ^a   Sloth, Erik ^a   Nygaard, Hans ^a   Hasenkam, J Michael ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; AORTA ROOT; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENTLESS HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; SWINE; VELOCITY; ANIMAL; AORTA VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; ECHOGRAPHY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HEMODYNAMICS; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS; SURGERY;

ANIMALS; AORTIC VALVE; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SWINE;

EID: 77956033169     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cowell SJ, Newby DE, Boon NA, Elder AT. Calcific aortic stenosis: same old story? Age Ageing 2004;33:538-544
2. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1231-1243
3. Kappetein AP, van GM, Takkenberg JJ, Bogers AJ. Optimum management of elderly patients with calcified aortic stenosis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2008;6:491-501
4. Jin XY, Pepper JR. Do stentless valves make a difference? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:95-100
5. Doty JR, Doty DB. Stentless xenografts for aortic valve replacement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003;17:240-251 (Pubitemid 36457484)
6. Thubrikar MJ, Deck JD, Aouad J, Nolan SP. Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:115-125
7. Robicsek F, Thubrikar MJ, Fokin AA. Cause of degenerative disease of the trileaflet aortic valve: Review of subject and presentation of a new theory. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1346-1354
8. Robicsek F, Thubrikar MJ. Loss of sinus compliance, cause of degenerative aortic valve disease, and early failure of biological valves. Z Kardiol 2000;89:104-106
9. De PR, De Matteis GM, Nardi P, Scaffa R, Bassano C, Chiariello L. Analysis of valve motion after the reimplantation type of valve-sparing procedure (David I) with a new aortic root conduit. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:53-57 (Pubitemid 34734645)
10. Robicsek F, Thubrikar MJ. Role of sinus wall compliance in aortic leaflet function. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:944-946
11. Kallikourdis A, Jacob S. Is a stentless aortic valve superior to conventional bioprosthetic valves for aortic valve replacement? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:665-672
12. Matsue H, Sawa Y, Matsumiya G, Matsuda H, Hamada S. Mid-term results of freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: Clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:630-636
13. Matsue H, Sawa Y, Takahashi T, et al. Three-dimensional flow velocity quantification of Freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthesis by magnetic resonance imaging: Surgical consideration. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;13:60-66
14. Sripathi VC, Kumar RK, Balakrishnan KR. Further insights into normal aortic valve function: Role of a compliant. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:844-851
15. Thubrikar M, Piepgrass WC, Shaner TW, Nolan SP. The design of the normal aortic valve. Am J Physiol 1981;241:H795-H801
16. Thubrikar MJ, Konstantinov IE, Selim GA, Gong GG, Fowler B, Robicsek F. The influence of sizing on the dynamic function of the free-hand implanted porcine aortic homograft: An in vitro study. J Heart Valve Dis 1999;8:242-253 (Pubitemid 29274325)
17. Nagy ZL, Fisher J, Walker PG, Watterson KG. The effect of sizing on the in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics and leaflet motion of the Toronto SPV stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:92-98
18. Desai ND, Merin O, Cohen GN, et al. Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with the St. Jude Toronto. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:2076-2083
19. David TE, Feindel CM, Bos J, Ivanov J, Armstrong S. Aortic valve replacement with Toronto SPV bioprosthesis: Optimal patient. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:19-24
20. Leyh RG, Schmidtke C, Sievers HH, Yacoub MH. Opening and closing characteristics of the aortic valve after different types of valve-preserving surgery. Circulation 1999;100:2153-2160
21. Aybek T, Sotiriou M, Wohleke T, et al. Valve opening and closing dynamics after different aortic valve-sparing operations. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:114-120
22. De PR, De Matteis GM, Nardi P, Scaffa R, Buratta MM, Chiariello L. Opening and closing characteristics of the aortic valve after valve-sparing procedures using a new aortic root conduit. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:487-494 (Pubitemid 32727154)
23. Jin XY, Westaby S. Pericardial stentless aortic valves: Effects of sizing on hemodynamics and root geometry. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;13:55-59 (Pubitemid 34110746)
24. Barratt-Boyes BG, Christie GW, Raudkivi PJ. The stentless bioprosthesis: Surgical challenges and implications for long-term durability. Eur J