Stentless xenografts for aortic valve replacement

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 240-251

  Doty, John R ^a   Doty, Donald B ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Aortic valve; Stentless; Valve replacement; Xenograft

Indexed keywords

ALLOGRAFT; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEMODYNAMICS; IMPLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; XENOGRAFT;

EID: 0037393755     PISSN: 10530770     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2003.37     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Binet JP, Duran CG, Carpentier A, et al: Heterologous aortic valve transplantation. Lancet 2:1275, 1965
2. O'Brien MF: Heterograft aortic valves for human use. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53:392-397, 1967
3. David TE, Pollick C, Bos J: Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99:113-118, 1990
4. Walther T, Falk V, Autschbach R, et al: Comparison of different anticalcification treatments for stentless bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 66:S249-254, 1998
5. Herijgers P, Ozaki S, Verbeken E, et al: The No-React anticalcification treatment: A comparison of Biocor No-React II and Toronto SPV stentless bioprostheses implanted in sheep. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11:171-175, 1999
6. Abolhoda A, Yu S, Oyarzun JR, et al: No-React detoxification process: A superior anticalcification method for bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 62:1724-1730, 1996
7. Chen W, Schoen FJ, Levy RJ: Mechanism of efficacy of alpha-amino oleic acid for inhibition of calcification of glutaraldehyde pretreated porcine bioprosthestic heart valves. Circulation 90:323-329, 1994
8. Gott JP, Chih P, Dorsey LMA, et al: Calcification of porcine valves: A successful new method of antimineralization. Ann Thorac Surg 53:207-216, 1992
9. Barratt-Boyes BG, Christie GW: What is the best bioprosthetic operation for the small aortic root? Allograft, autograft, porcine or pericardial? Stented or unstented? J Card Surg 9:158-164, 1994
10. Sintek CF, Fletcher AD, Khonsari S: Stentless porcine aortic root: Valve of choice for the elderly patient with small aortic root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 109:871-876. 1995
11. Westaby S, Amarasena N, Long V, et al: Time-related hemodynamic changes after aortic replacement with the freestyle stentless xenograft. Ann Thorac Surg 60:1633-1639, 1995
12. Del Rizzo DF, Goldman BS, Christakis GT, et al: Hemodynamic benefits of the Toronto stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:1431-1446, 1996
13. Fries R, Wendler O, Schieffer H, et al: Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamics of 23-mm stentless versus 23-mm stented aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 69:817-822, 2000
14. Nagy ZL, Fisher J, Walker PG, et al: The effect of sizing on the hydrodynamic parameters of the Medtronic freestyle valve in vitro. Ann Thorac Surg 69:1408-1413, 2000
15. De Paulis R, Sommariva L, Colagrande L, et al: Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with different valve substitutes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116:590-598, 1998
16. Walther T, Falk V, Langebartels G, et al: Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after stentless versus conventional aortic valve replacement. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11:18-21, 1999
17. Westaby S, Horton M, Jin XY, et al: Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 70:785-791, 2000
18. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier P, et al: The effect of prosthetic valve type on survival after aortic valve surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11:1-8, 1999
19. Doty DB, Cafferty A, Kon ND, et al: Medtronic Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis: Implant techniques. J Card Surg 13:369-375, 1998
20. Dagenais F, Cartier P, Dumesnil JG, et al: A single center experience with the Freestyle bioprosthesis: Midterm results at the Quebec Heart Institute. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13:156-162, 2001 (suppl)
21. Kappetein AP, Braun J, Baur LHB, et al: Outcome and follow-up of aortic valve replacement with the freestyle stentless bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 71:691-698, 2001
22. Cartier PC, Dumesnil JG, Metras J, et al: Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 67:345-351, 1999
23. Kon ND, Cordell AR, Adair SM, et al: Aortic root replacement with the freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 67:1609-1616, 1999
24. Westaby S, Jin XY, Katsumata T, et al: Valve replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis: Versatility of the porcine aortic root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116:477-484, 1998
25. Doty JR, Flores JH, Millar RC, et al: Aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis: Operative technique and results. J Card Surg 13:208-217, 1998
26. Sintek CF, Pfeffer TA, Kochamba GS, et al: Freestyle valve experience: Technical considerations and mid-term results. J Card Surg 13:360-368, 1998
27. Goldman B, Christakis G, David T, et al: Will stentless valves be durable? The Toronto valve (TSPV) at 5 to 6 years. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11:42-49, 1999
28. Shargall Y, Goldman B, Christakis G, David T: Analysis of explants and causes of mortality during long-term follow-up of the Toronto stentless porcine valve. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13:106-112, 2001
29. Williams RJ, McLean AD, Pathi VL, et al: Six-year follow-up of the Toronto stentless porcine valve. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13:168-172, 2001 (suppl)
30. Mohr FW, Walther T, Baryalei M, et al: The Toronto SPV bioprosthesis: One-year results in 100 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 60:171-175, 1995
31. David TE, Feindel CM, Bos J, et al: Aortic valve replacement with a stentless porcine aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 108:1030-1036, 1994
32. Gelsomino S, Frassani R, DaCol P, et al: The Cryolife-O'Brien stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis: 5-year follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 71:86-91, 2001
33. Hvass U, Palatianos GM, Frassani R, et al: Multicenter study of stentless valve replacement in the small aortic root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117:267-272, 1999
34. O'Brien MF, Gardner MAH, Garlick RB, et al: The Cryolife-O'Brien stentless aortic porcine xenograft valve. J Card Surg 13:376-385, 1998
35. Jin XY, Ratnatunga C, Pillai R: Performance of Edwards prima stentless aortic valve over eight years. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13:163-167, 2001 (suppl)
36. Bortolotti U, Scioti G, Milano A, et al: The Edwards Prima stentless valve: Hemodynamic performance at one year. Ann Thorac Surg 68:2147-2151, 1999
37. Jin XY, Dhital K, Bhattacharya K, et al: Fifth-year hemodynamic performance of the Prima stentless aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 66:805-809, 1998
38. Dossche K, Vanermen H: Experience with the Edwards Prima stentless aortic bioprosthesis: A 2-year review. J Heart Valve Dis 4:S85-S88, 1995
39. Vrandecic M, Fantini FA, Filho BG, et al: Longterm results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 11:47-53, 2002
40. Bertolini P, Luciani GB, Vecchi B, et al: Aortic valve replacement with the Biocor PSB stentless xenograft. Ann Thorac Surg 66:425-430, 1998
41. Maselli D, Pizio R, Bruno LP, et al: Left ventricular mass reduction after aortic valve replacement: Homografts, stentless and stented valves. Ann Thorac Surg 67:966-971, 1999
42. Jin XY, Zhang ZM, Gibson DG, et al: Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 62:683-690, 1996
43. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, et al: Impact of prosthesispatient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 7:211-218, 1998
44. Doty JR, Flores JH, Millar RC, Doty DB: Aortic valve replacement with medtronic freestyle bioprosthesis: Operative technique and results. J Card Surg 13:208-217, 1998
45. David TE, Psuchmann R, Ivanov J, et al: Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves: A case-match study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116:236-241, 1998
46. Rao V, Christakis GT, Sever J, et al: A novel comparison of stentless versus stented valves in the small aortic root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117:431-438, 1999
47. Vrandecic M, Fantini FA, Filho BG, et al: Retrospective clinical analysis of stented vs. stentless porcine aortic bioprostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 18:46-53, 2000
48. Cohen G, Christakis GT, Joyner CD, et al: Are stentless valves superior to stented valves? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 73:676-678, 2002
49. Gross C, Harringer W, Beran H, et al: Aortic valve replacement: Is the stentless xenograft an alternative to the homograft? Midterm results. Ann Thorac Surg 68:919-924, 1999
50. Kon ND, Cordell AR, Adair SM, et al: Comparison of results using "freestyle" stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis with cryopreserved aortic allograft. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11:69-73, 1999
51. Rajappan K, Melina G, Bellenger NG, et al: Evaluation of left ventricular function and mass after Medtronic Freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Heart Valve Dis 11:60-65, 2002
52. Legare JF, Wood JW, Koilpillai C, et al: St. Jude SPV versus Medtronic Freestyle: A single institution comparison of two stentless aortic valves. J Card Surg 13:392-397, 1998
53. Riley RD, Hammon JW Jr, Adair SM, et al: Stentless aortic valve replacement with Freestyle or Toronto SPV: An early comparison. Ann Thoracic Surg 70:48-52, 2000
54. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A: Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of the Medtronic Freestyle and Toronto SPV stentless valves. J Card Surg 13:398-407, 1998
55. Luciani GB, Bertolini P, Vecchi B, et al: Midterm results after aortic valve replacement with freehand stentless xenografts: A comparison of three prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:1287-1297, 1998
56. Bach DS: Echocardiographic assessment of stentless aortic bioprosthetic valves. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 13:941-948, 2000
57. Baur LHB, Jin XY, Houdas Y, et al: Echocardiographic parameters of the freestyle stentless bioprosthesis in aortic position: The European experience. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 12:729-735, 1999