Mid-term results of freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: Clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 630-636

  Matsue, Hajime ^a   Sawa, Yoshiki ^a   Matsumiya, Goro ^a   Matsuda, Hikaru ^a,b   Hamada, Seiki ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b HYOGO COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ENDOCARDITIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MONITORING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTOLE; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STENTS;

EID: 27744583193     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bach DS, Kon ND, Dumesnil JG, Sintek CF, Doty DB. Eight-year results after aortic valve replacement with the Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1657-1663
2. Dumesnil JG, LeBlanc MH, Cartier PC, et al. Hemodynamic features of the Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis compared with stented bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S130-S133
3. Yoganathan AP, Eberhardt CE, Walker PG. Hydrodynamic performance of the Medtronic Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:571-578
4. Ohtake S, Sawa Y, Sakaguchi T, et al. Early experience of aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis in elderly patients. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48:222-228
5. Sakaguchi T, Sawa Y, Ohtake S, Hirata N, Matsuda H. The Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis for prosthetic valve endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:553-555
6. Sawa Y, Matsuda H. Efficacy of aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless valve in patients with aortic valve disease. Kyobu Geka 2000;53:319-322
7. Westaby S, Horton M, Jin XY, et al. Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:785-790
8. Akar AR, Szafranek A, Alexiou C, et al. Use of stentless xenografts in the aortic position: Determinants of early and late outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1450-1457
9. Kappetein AP, Braun J, Baur LHB, et al. Outcome and follow-up of aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:601-608
10. David TE, Feindel CM, Scully HE, Bos J, Rakowski H. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves: A ten-year experience. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:250-254
11. Bach DS, LeMire MS, Eberhart D, et al. Impact of high transvalvular velocities early after implantation of Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:536-543
12. Bach DS, Cartier PA, Kon N, Johnson KG, Dumesnil JG, Doty DB. Impact of high transvalvular to subvalvular velocity ratio early after aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;13(Suppl.1):75-81
13. Baur LH, Jin XY, Houdas Y, et al. Echocardiographic parameters of the freestyle stentless bioprosthesis in aortic position: The European experience. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999;12:729-735
14. Matsue H, Sawa Y, Takahashi T, et al. Three-dimensional flow velocity quantification of Freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthesis by magnetic resonance imaging: Surgical consideration. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;13(4 Suppl.1):60-66
15. Nagy ZL, Fisher J, Walker PG, Watterson KG. The effect of sizing on the in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics and leaflet motion of the Toronto SPV stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:92-98
16. Kon ND, Westaby S, Amarasena N, Pillai R, Cordell AR. Comparison of implantation techniques using Freestyle stentless porcine aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:857-862
17. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1131-1141
18. Rao V, Jamieson WRE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, David TE. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2000;102 (Suppl.III):III5-III9
19. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Jobin J, Cartier P, Honos G, Durand LG. Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve. Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1609-1617