Embryonic inbreeding depression varies among populations and by mating system in Witheringia solanacea (Solanaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 97, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1328-1333

  Stone, Judy L ^a   Wilson, Emily E ^a   Kwak, Andrew S ^a  

^a Colby College   (United States)

Author keywords

Costa rica; Embryonic inbreeding depression; Evolution; Mating system; Self compatibility; Self incompatibility; Solanaceae; Witheringia solanacea

Indexed keywords

BIOASSAY; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC MARKER; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY; SHRUB;

COSTA RICA;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SOLANACEAE; WITHERINGIA SOLANACEA;

EID: 77956000811     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000020     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barrett, S. C. H. 2002. Sexual interference of the fl oral kind. Heredity 88: 154-159.
2. Bertin, R. I., and M. Sullivan. 1988. Pollen interference and cryptic selfincompatibility in Campsis radicans. American Journal of Botany 75: 1140-1147.
3. Bohs, L. 2000. Insights into the Witheringia solanacea (Solanaceae) complex in Costa Rica. I. Breeding systems and crossing studies. Biotropica 32: 70-79.
4. Broyles, S. B., and R. Wyatt. 1993. The consequences of self-pollination in Asclepias exaltata, a self-incompatible milkweed. American Journal of Botany 80: 41-44.
5. Busch, J. W. 2005. Inbreeding depression in self-incompatible and self-compatible populations of Leavenworthia alabamica. Heredity 94: 159-165.
6. Byers, D. L., and D. M. Waller. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 479-513.
7. Chang, S.-M., and M. D. Rausher. 1999. The role of inbreeding depression in maintaining the mixed mating system of the common morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. Evolution 53: 1366-1376.
8. Crnokrak, P., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2002. Purging the genetic load: A review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56: 2347-2358.
9. D'Arcy, W. G. 1973. Flora of Panama. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 60: 573-580.
10. de Nettancourt, D. 2000. Incompatibility and incongruity in wild and cultivated plants. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
11. Fishman, L. 2001. Inbreeding depression in two populations of Arenaria unifl ora (Caryophyllaceae) with contrasting mating systems. Heredity 86: 184-194.
12. Galen, C., T. Gregory, and L. F. Galloway. 1989. Costs of self-pollination in a self-incompatible plant, Polemonium viscosum. American Journal of Botany 76: 1675-1680.
13. Glémin, S., T. Bataillon, J. Ronfort, A. Mignot, and I. Oliveiri. 2001. Inbreeding depression in small populations of self-incompatible plants. Genetics 159: 1217-1229.
14. Glémin, S., J. Ronfort, and T. Bataillon. 2003. Patterns of inbreeding depression and architecture of the load in subdivided populations. Genetics 165: 2193-2212.
15. Goodwillie, C., and M. C. Knight. 2006. Inbreeding depression and mixed mating in Leptosiphon jepsonii: a comparison of three populations. Annals of Botany 98: 351-360.
16. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1995. Magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in a diploid population of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). Heredity 75: 206-215.
17. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-67.
18. Igic, B., R. Lande, and J. R. Kohn. 2008. Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 93-104.
19. Kärkkäinen, K., H. Kuittinen, R. van Treuren, C. Vogl, S. Oikarinen, and O. Savolainen. 1999. Genetic basis of inbreeding depression in Arabis petraea. Evolution 53: 1354-1365.
20. Kennedy, B. F., and E. Elle. 2008. The inbreeding depression cost of selfi ng: Importance of fl ower size and population size in Collinisa parvifl ora (Veronicaceae). American Journal of Botany 95: 1596-1605.
21. Krebs, S. L., and J. F. Hancock. 1990. Early-acting inbreeding depression and reproductive success in highbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 79: 825-832.
22. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
23. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113: 67-79.
24. McClure, B. A., J. E. Gray, M. A. Anderson, and A. E. Clarke. 1990. Self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata involves degradation of pollen rRNA. Nature 347: 757-760.
25. Porcher, E., and R. Lande. 2005. Loss of gametophytic self-incompatibility with evolution of inbreeding depression. Evolution 59: 46-60.
26. Raspé, O., P. Guillaume, and A.-L. Jacquemart. 2004. Inbreeding depression and biased paternity after mixed-pollination in Vaccinium myrtillus L. (Ericaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 765-771.
27. Ritland, K. 1990. Inferences about inbreeding depression based on changes of the inbreeding coeffi cient. Evolution 44: 1230-1241.
28. Roze, D., and F. Rousset. 2004. Joint effects of self-fertilization and population structure on mutation load, inbreeding depression, and heterosis. Genetics 167: 1001-1015.
29. Rozen, S., and H. J. Skaletsky. 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Krawetz and S. Misener [eds.], Bioinformatics methods and protocols: Methods in molecular biology, 365-386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA.
30. Schultz, S. T., and J. H. Willis. 1995. Individual variation in inbreeding depression: The roles of inbreeding history and mutation. Genetics 141: 1209-1223.
31. Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering plants: Evolution above the species level. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
32. Stone, J. L., and E. G. Jenkins. 2008. Pollinator abundance and pollen limitation of a solanaceous shrub at premontane and lower montane sites. Biotropica 40: 55-61.
33. Stone, J. L., and A. F. Motten. 2002. Anther-stigma separation is associated with inbreeding depression in Datura stramonium, a predominantly selfi ng annual. Evolution 56: 2187-2195.
34. Stone, J. L., and S. E. Pierce. 2005. Rapid recent radiation of S-RNase lineages in Witheringia solanacea (Solanaceae). Heredity 94: 547-555.
35. Stone, J. L., M. A. Sasuclark, and C. P. Blomberg. 2006. Variation in the SI response within and among populations of the tropical shrub Witheringia solanacea (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 592-598.
36. Takebayashi, N., and L. F. Delph. 2000. An association between a fl oral trait and inbreeding depression. Evolution 54: 840-846.
37. Vogler, D. W., K. Filmore, and A. G. Stephenson. 1999. Inbreeding depression in Campanula rapunculoides L. I. A comparison of inbreeding depression in plants derived from strong and weak self-incompatibility phenotypes. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 483-494.
38. Waser, N. M., and M. V. Price. 1991. Reproductive costs of self-pollination in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae): Are ovules usurped? American Journal of Botany 78: 1036-1043.