Foraging on spatially distributed resources with sub-optimal movement, imperfect information, and travelling costs: Departures from the ideal free distribution

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1469-1483

  Matsumura, Shuichi ^a,b   Arlinghaus, Robert ^c,d   Dieckmann, Ulf ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

^b GIFU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY AND INLAND FISHERIES   (Germany)

^d HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRYING CAPACITY; FOOD INTAKE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HOMOGENEITY; IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTION; MOVEMENT; OPTIMUM FORAGING THEORY; PATCHINESS; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 77955997857     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18196.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Abernethy K E. Why do fishers fish where they fish? Using the ideal free distribution to understand the behaviour of artisanal reef fishers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2007, 64:1595-1604.
2. Abrahams M V. Patch choice under perceptual constraints: a cause for departures from an ideal free distribution. Behav. Ecol. Sociol. 1986, 19:409-415.
3. Abrahams M V, Healey M C. Variation in the competitive abilities of fishermen and its influence on the spatial distribution of the British Columbia salmon troll fleet. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1990, 47:1116-1121.
4. Abrahams M V, Healey M C. Some consequences of variation in vessel density: a manipulative experiment. Fish. Res. 1993, 15:315-322.
5. Adler F R, Nuernberger B. Persistence in patchy irregular landscapes. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1994, 45:41-75.
6. Åström M. Travel cost and the ideal free distribution. Oikos 1994, 69:516-519.
7. Bernstein C. Individual decisions and the distribution of predators in a patchy environment. J. Anim. Ecol. 1988, 57:1007-1026.
8. Bernstein C. Individual decisions and the distribution of predators in a patchy environment. II. The influence of travel costs and structure of the environment. J. Anim. Ecol. 1991, 60:205-225.
9. Bernstein C. Predator migration decisions, the ideal free distribution and predator-prey dynamics. Am. Nat. 1999, 153:267-281.
10. Carter R V, Abrahams M V. Predicting the distribution of organisms among a few patches: problems with detecting departures from the ideal free distribution. Oikos 1987, 78:388-393.
11. Cézilly F, Boy V. Ideal free distribution and individual decision rules: a Bayesian approach. Acta Oecol. 1991, 12:403-410.
12. Clark C W. Mathematical bioeconomics (2nd ed.) 1990, Wiley
13. Collins E J. The ideal free distribution: an analysis of the perceptual limit model. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2002, 4:471-474.
14. Cressman R, Krivan V. Migration dynamics for the ideal free distribution. Am. Nat. 2006, 168:384-397.
15. Dolman P M, Sutherland W J. Spatial patterns of depletion imposed by foraging vertebrates: theory, review and meta-analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 1997, 66:481-494.
16. Doncaser C P. A useful phenomenological difference between exploitation and interference in the distribution of ideal free predators. J. Anim. Ecol. 1999, 68:836-838.
17. Doncaster C P. Extension of ideal free resource use to breeding populations and metapopulations. Oikos 2000, 89:24-36.
18. Egas M. Evolution restricts the coexistence of specialists and generalists: the role of tradeoff structure. Am. Nat. 2004, 163:518-531.
19. Flaxman S M, Reeve H K. Putting competition strategies into ideal free distribution models: habitat selection as a tug of war. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 243:587-593.
20. Fretwell S D, Lucas H L. On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta. Biotheor. 1970, 19:16-36.
21. Gillis D M. Ideal free distributions in fleet dynamics: a behavioral perspective on vessel movement in fisheries analysis. Can. J. Zool. 2003, 81:177-187.
22. Gillis D M. Movement dynamics in a fishery: application of the ideal free distribution to spatial allocation of effort. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1993, 50:323-333.
23. Hakoyama H. The ideal free distribution when the resource is variable. Behav. Ecol. 2003, 14:109-115.
24. Hakoyama H, Iguchi K. The information of food distribution realizes an ideal free distribution: support of perceptual limitation. J. Ethol. 2001, 19:129-137.
25. Harper D G C. Competitive foraging in mallards: 'ideal free' ducks. Anim. Behav. 1982, 30:575-584.
26. Haugen T O. The ideal free pike: 50 years of fitness-maximizing dispersal in Windermere. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2006, 273:2917-2924.
27. Houston A I. Matching and ideal free distributions. Oikos 2008, 117:978-983.
28. Houston A I, McNamara J M. Switching between resources and the ideal free distribution. Anim. Behav. 1987, 35:301-302.
29. Hugie D M, Grand T C. Movement between habitats by unequal competitors: effects of finite population size on ideal free distributions. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2003, 5:131-153.
30. Inman A J. Group foraging in starlings: distribution of unequal competitors. Anim. Behav. 1990, 40:801-810.
31. Jackson A L. Resolving the departures of observed results from the ideal free distribution with simple random movements. J. Anim. Ecol. 2004, 73:612-622.
32. Jones O R. Distribution of a naturally fluctuating ungulate population among heterogeneous plant communities: ideal and free? J. Anim. Ecol. 2006, 75:1387-1392.
33. Kacelnick A. The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1992, 7:50-55.
34. Kennedy M, Gray R D. Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the ideal free distribution. Oikos 1993, 68:158-166.
35. Kennedy M, Grey R D. Habitat choice, habitat matching and the effect of travel distance. Behaviour 1997, 134:905-920.
36. Kennedy M. Quantifying the effect of predation risk on foraging bullies: no need to assume an IFD. Ecology 1994, 75:2220-2226.
37. Koops M A, Abrahams M V. Integrating the roles of information and competitive ability on the spatial distribution of social foragers. Am. Nat. 2003, 161:586-600.
38. Korona R. Travel costs and ideal free distribution of ovipositing female flour beetles, Tribolium confusum. Anim. Behav. 1990, 40:186-187.
39. Krivan V. The ideal free distribution: a review and synthesis of the game-theoretic perspective. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2008, 73:403-425.
40. Lessells C M. Putting resource dynamics into continuous input ideal free distribution models. Anim. Behav. 1995, 49:487-494.
41. Milinski M. An evolutionarily stable feeding strategy in sticklebacks. Z. Tierpsychol. 1979, 51:36-40.
42. Milinski M. Competitive resource sharing: an experimental test of a learning rule for ESSs. Anim. Behav. 1984, 32:233-242.
43. Milinski M. Ideal free theory predicts more than only matching - a critique of Kennedy and Gray's review. Oikos 1994, 71:163-166.
44. Morris D W. Spatial scale and the cost of density-dependent habitat selection. Evol. Ecol. 1987, 1:379-388.
45. Ollason J G, Yearsley J M. The approximately ideal, more or less free distribution. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2001, 59:87-105.
46. Parker G A, Sutherland W J. Ideal free distribution when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free model. Anim. Behav. 1986, 34:1222-1242.
47. Parkinson E A. Linking the dynamics of harvest effort to recruitment dynamics in a multistock, spatially structured fishery. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2004, 61:1658-1670.
48. Ranta E. Resource matching with limited knowledge. Oikos 1999, 86:383-385.
49. Ranta E. Size of environmental grain and resource matching. Oikos 2000, 89:573-576.
50. Regelman K. Competitive resource sharing: a simulation model. Anim. Behav. 1984, 32:226-132.
51. Ruxton G D, Humphries S. Non-IFD movements: reflections on past work and prospects for future developments. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2003, 5:155-157.
52. Smallegange I M, van der Meer J. The distribution of unequal predators across food patches is not necessarily (semi) truncated. Behav. Ecol. 2009, 20:525-534.
53. Spencer H G. Patch choice with competitive asymmetries and perceptual limits: the importance of history. Anim. Behav. 1995, 50:497-508.
54. Spencer H G. Perceptual constraints on optimal foraging: the effects of variation among foragers. Evol. Ecol. 1996, 10:331-339.
55. Tregenza T. Building on the ideal free distribution. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1995, 26:253-302.
56. Tregenza T. Interference and the ideal free distribution: models and tests. Behav. Ecol. 1996, 7:379-386.
57. Vahl W. Interference competition, the spatial distribution of food and free-living foragers. Anim. Behav. 2007, 74:1493-1503.
58. Vandermeer J H, Goldberg D E. Population ecology: first principles 2003, Princeton Univ. Press
59. van der Meer J. The ideal free distribution when predators differ in competitive ability. Oikos 1997, 80:301-310.
60. van der Meer J, Ens B J. Models of interference and their consequences for the spatial distribution of ideal and free predators. J. Anim. Ecol. 1997, 66:846-858.
61. Weber T P. News from the realm of the ideal free distribution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998, 13:89-90.