A mono surrogate for multiobjective optimization

Proceedings of the 12th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO '10

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 479-486

  Loshchilov, IIya ^a   Schoenauer, Marc ^a   Sebag, Michèle ^b  

^a INRIA SACLAY   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Multiobjective optimization; Support vector machine; Surrogate models

Indexed keywords

BENCH-MARK PROBLEMS; DECISION SPACE; EMPIRICAL VALIDATION; EVOLUTIONARY MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; ONE-CLASS SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; PARETO FRONT; PARETO SET; SINGLE-VALUE; SPEED-UPS; STANDARD VARIATION; SURROGATE APPROACH; SURROGATE MODEL;

FUEL ADDITIVES; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; PARETO PRINCIPLE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 77955916875     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1830483.1830571     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. A. Auger, J. Bader, D. Brockhoff, andE. Zitzler. Theory of the hypervolume indicator: Optimal μ-distributions and the choice of the reference point. In FOGA, pages 87-102. ACM, 2009.
2. D. W. Corne, N. R. Jerram, J. D. Knowles, andM. J. Oates. PESA-II: Region-based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In Lee Spector et al., editor, GECCO-2001, pages 283-290. Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.
3. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, andT. Meyarivan. A Fast Elitist Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE TEC, 6: 182-197, 2000.
4. M. Emmerich, N. Beume, andB. Naujoks. An EMO Algorithm Using the Hypervolume Measure as Selection Criterion. In Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Opt., pages 62-76. LNCS 3410, Springer Verlag, 2005.
5. M. T. Emmerich, K. C. Giannakoglou, andB. Naujoks. Single- and Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization Assisted by Gaussian Random Field Metamodels. IEEE TEC, 10(4): 421-439, 2006.
6. C. Igel, N. Hansen, andS. Roth. Covariance Matrix Adaptation for Multi-objective Optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 15(1): 1-28, 2007.
7. Y. Jin. A Comprehensive Survey of Fitness Approximation in Evolutionary Computation. Soft Computing, 9(1): 3-12, 2005.
8. J. Knowles andH. Nakayama. Meta-modeling in multiobjective optimization. In J. Branke et al., editor, Multiobjective Optimization, number 5252 in LNCS, pages 245-284. Springer Verlag, 2008.
9. J. Knowles, L. Thiele, andE. Zitzler. A tutorial on the performance assessment of stochastic multiobjective optimizers. Technical report, 2006.
10. K. Rasheed andH. Hirsh. Informed operators: Speeding up genetic-algorithm-based design optimization using reduced models. In D. Whitley et al., editor, GECCO'2000, pages 628-635. Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.
11. B. Schölkopf, J. Platt, J. Shawe-Taylor, A. Smola, andR. Williamson. Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution. Neural Computation, 13: 1443-1471, 2001.
12. A. J. Smola andB. Schölkopf. A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing, 14(3): 199-222, 2004.
13. V. Vapnik. Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, 1998.
14. I. Voutchkov andA. Keane. Multiobjective Optimization using Surrogates. In I. Parmee, editor, ACDM'06, pages 167-175. Institute for People-centred Computation, 2006.
15. E. F. Wanner, F. G. G. aes, R. H. C. Takahashi, and P. J. Fleming. Local Search with Quadratic Approximations into Memetic Algorithms for Optimization with Multiple Criteria. Evolutionary Computation, 16(2): 185-224, 2008.
16. Y.Yun, H. Nakayama, andM. Arakava. Generation of pareto frontiers using support vector machine. In MCDM'04, 2004.
17. E. Zitzler, K. Deb, andL. Thiele. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results. Evolutionary Computation, 8: 173-195, 2000.