Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class i and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-Month results

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 451-459

  Dos Santos, Márcia Pereira Alves ^a   Luiz, Ronir Raggio ^a   Maia, Lucianne Cople ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Deciduous; Dental cavity preparation; Dental materials; Molar; Randomised clinical trial; Survival rate; Tooth

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOMER; FREEDOM COMPOMER; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; TPH SPECTRUM; VITREMER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH PLAQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COLOR; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING, LIGHT-CURED; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PLAQUE INDEX; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77955884631     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/ composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings from the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. Journal of American Dental Association 2007;138:763-72.
2. Kovarik RE. Restoration of posterior teeth in clinical practice: evidence base for choosing amalgam versus composite. Dental Clinic North American 2009;53:71-6.
3. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitao J, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. Journal of American Dental Association 2007;138:775-83.
4. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD). Guideline on pediatric restorative dentistry. Pediatric Dentistry 2008;30:163-9.
5. Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, Buerkle V, Garcia-Godoy F, Manhart J. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. American Journal of Dentistry 2005;18:198-211. (Pubitemid 41139541)
6. Kramer N, Garcia-Godoy F, Frankenberger R. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations. American Journal of Dentistry 2005;18:75-81. (Pubitemid 40934171)
7. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Adhesive restorative materials: a review. Australian Dental Journal 2004;49:112-21. (Pubitemid 39334833)
8. McComb D. Systematic review of conservative operative caries management strategies. Journal of Dental Education 2001;65:1154-61.
9. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry 2004;29:481-508. (Pubitemid 39278667)
10. Yengopal V, Harneker SY, Patel N, Siegfried N. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition. Cochrane Database Systematic Review 2009;2:CD004483.
11. Toh SL, Messer LB. Evidence-based assessment of toothcolored restorations in proximal lesions of primary molars. Pediatric Dentistry 2007;29:8-15.
12. Hse KM, Leung SK, Wei SH. Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: a review. Australian Dental Journal 1999;44:1-11.
13. Hayashi M, Wilson NH. Marginal deterioration as a predictor of failure of a posterior composite. European Journal of Oral Science 2003;111:155-62. (Pubitemid 37467782)
14. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clinical Oral Investigation 2007;11:5-33.
15. dos Santos MP, Passos M, Luiz RR, Maia LC. A randomized trial of resin-based restorations in class I and class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 24-month results. Journal of American Dental Association 2009;140:156-66. [quiz 247-248].
16. Mjor IA. Controlled clinical trials and practice-based research in dentistry. Journal of Dentistry Research 2008;87:605.
17. Oldenburg TR, Vann Jr WF, Dilley DC. Composite restorations for primary molars: two-year results. Pediatric Dentistry 1985;7:96-103.
18. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. International Dental Journal 1980;30:347-58.
19. Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. International Dental Journal 1975;25:229-35.
20. Opdam NJM, Loomans BAC, Roeters FJM, Bronkhorst EM. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. Journal of Dentistry 2004;32:379-83. (Pubitemid 38749116)
21. Mjor IA. Practice-based dental research. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2007;34:913-20.
22. Tu YK, Blance A, Clerehugh V, Gilthorpe MS. Statistical power for analyses of changes in randomized controlled trials. Journal of Dentistry Research 2005;84:283-7. (Pubitemid 43822039)
23. Qvist V, Manscher E, Teglers PT. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results. Journal of Dentistry 2004;32:285-94. (Pubitemid 38438438)
24. Wendt LK, Koch G, Birkhed D. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition. Swedish Dental Journal 1998;22:149-55. (Pubitemid 128689277)
25. Bayne SC. Dental restorations for oral rehabilitation- testing of laboratory properties versus clinical performance for clinical decision making. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2007;34:921-32.
26. Angker L, Swain MV, Kilpatrick N. Characterising the micromechanical behaviour of the carious dentine of primary teeth using nano-indentation. Journal of Biomechanics 2005;38:1535-42. (Pubitemid 40753555)
27. Suwatviroj P, Messer LB, Palamara JE. Microtensile bond strength of tooth-colored materials to primary tooth dentin. Pediatric Dentistry 2004;26:67-74. (Pubitemid 39258103)
28. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of Dental Research 2005;84:118-23.
29. Mhaville RJ, van Amerongen WE, Mandari GJ. Residual caries and marginal integrity in relation to Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars. Europen Archieves of Paediatric Dentistry 2006;7:81-4.
30. Duggal MS, Toumba KJ, Sharma NK. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation. British Dental Journal 2002;193:339-42.
31. Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. Journal of American Dental Association 1999;130:1459-66.
32. Croll TP, Bar-Zion Y, Segura A, Donly KJ. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation. Journal of American Dental Association 2001;132:1110-6. (Pubitemid 33609935)
33. Hubel S, Mejare I. Conventional versus resin-modified glassionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2003;13:2-8. (Pubitemid 37255707)
34. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Monting JS. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. American Journal of Dentistry 2001;14:148-52. (Pubitemid 33673788)
35. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. Journal of Dental Research 2000;79:1385-91. (Pubitemid 32489445)
36. Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clinical Oral Investigation 2003;7:63-70.
37. Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Kieri C. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years. American Journal of Dentistry 2004;17:43-50. (Pubitemid 41310027)
38. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Studervant JR, Wilder AD, Sluder TB. Contributing co-variables in clinical trials. American Journal of Dentistry 1991;4:247-50.
39. Meola MT, Papaccio G. A scanning electron microscope study of the effect of etching time and mechanical pretreatment on the pattern of acid etching on the enamel of primary teeth. International Dental Journal 1986;36:49-53.
40. Lee BB, White GE. Chamfered margin effects on occlusal microleakage of primary molar Class I composite resin restorations in vitro. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 1998;22:113-6. (Pubitemid 128773451)
41. Nozaka K, Suruga Y, Amari E. Microleakage of composite resins in cavities of upper primary molars. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 1999;9:185-94.
42. Kakaboura A, Eliades G, Palaghias G. An FTIR study on the setting mechanism of resin-modified glass ionomer restoratives. Dental Materials 1996;12:173-8. (Pubitemid 126758818)
43. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials: a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. American Journal of Dentistry 1995;8:59-67.
44. Cefaly DFG, de Mello LLCP, Wang L, Lauris JRP, D'Alpino PHP. Effect of light curing unit on resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: a microhardness assessment. Journal of Applied Science 2009;17:150-4.
45. Mitra SB, Kedrowski BL. Long-term mechanical properties of glass ionomers. Dental Materials 1994;10:78-82.
46. Miyasaki M, Moore BK, Onose H. Effect of surface coatings on flexural properties of glass ionomers. European Journal of Oral Science 1996;104:600-4. (Pubitemid 126782221)
47. De Gee AJ. Physical properties of glass-ionomer cements: setting shrinkage and wear. In: Davidson CL, Mjor IA, editors. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. IL: Quintessence; 1999. p. 51-65.
48. Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dental Materials 1996;12:64-9.
49. Osorio R, Aguilera F, Otero P, Romero M, Osorio E, García- Godoy F, et al. Primary dentin etching time, bond strength and ultra-structure characterization of dentin surfaces. Journal of Dentistry 2010;38:222-31.
50. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoridereleasing restorative materials-fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dental Materials 2007;23:343-62. (Pubitemid 46135733)
51. Yap AUJ, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials. Operative Dentistry 2004;29:100-4. (Pubitemid 38130907)
52. Schwender N, Huber K, Al Marrawi F, Hannig M, Ziegler Ch. Initial bioadhesion on surfaces in the oral cavity investigated by scanning force microscopy. Applied Surface Science 2005;252:117-22. (Pubitemid 41276961)
53. Mitsuhashi A, Hanaoka K, Teranaka T. Fracture toughness of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials: effect of powder/liquid ratio and powder particle size reduction on fracture toughness. Dental Material 2003;19:747-57.
54. Meyer JM, Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V. Compomers: between glass-ionomers cements and composites. Biomaterials 1998;19:529-39.
55. Huang C, Tay FR, Cheung GS, Kei LH, Wei SH, Pashley DH. Hygroscopic expansion of a compomer and a composite on artificial gap reduction. Journal of Dentistry 2002;30:11-9. (Pubitemid 40433455)