Social network science: Pedagogy, dialogue, deliberation

Journal of Science Communication

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-9

  Watermeyer, Richard ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955861119     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18242049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22323/2.09010204     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. M. McMahon (1997), Social Constructivism and the World Wide Web - A Paradigm for Learning, Paper presented at the ASCILITE conference. Perth, Australia.
2. J. Dewey (1938), Experience and Education, New York: Collier Books.
3. D.A. Kolb (1984), Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
4. B. Bernstein (1975), Class and Pedagogies: Visible and Invisible, in H. Halsey et al. (1999), Education: Culture, Economy, Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press
5. P. Brown (1995), Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion: Some Observations on Recent Trends in Education, Employment, and the Labour Market, Work, Employment and Society 9: 29-51.
6. P. Bourdieu and J. Passeron (1977), Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, London: Sage.
7. A. Kukla (2000), Social Construction and the Philosophy of Science, London: Routledge.
8. J. Piaget (1970), Structuralism, New York: Harper & Row.
9. C. Rogers and H. J. Freiberg (1993), Freedom to Learn (3rd edn.), New York: Merrill.
10. J. Dewey (1916), Democracy and Education. An introduction to the philosophy of education (1966 edn.), New York: Free Press pg.16.
11. A. Gutmann and D. Thompson (2004), Why Deliberative Democracy?, NJ: Princeton University Press pg.3.
12. M.W. Bauer, N. Allum and S. Miller (2007), What Can We Learn from 25 Years of PUS Survey Research? Liberating and Expanding the Agenda, Public Understanding of Science 16(1): 79-95.
13. A. Hansen (2009), Science Communication and Media, in Richard Holliman, Elizabeth Whitelegg, Eileen Scanlon, Sam Smidt and Jeff Thomas (eds), Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age, Oxford: Oxford University Press
14. Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering (2004), Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainities, Royal Society Policy Document 19/04. London: Royal Society.
15. J. Stilgoe and J. Wilsdon (2009), The New Politics of Public Engagement with Science, in Richard Holliman, Elizabeth Whitelegg, Eileen Scanlon, Sam Smidt and Jeff Thomas (eds.), Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. H. Holec (1981), Autonomy and foreign language learning, Oxford: Pergamon.
17. J. Dewey (1938), Experience and Education, New York: Collier Books.
18. J. Gregory and S. Miller (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility. MA: Perseus.
19. The Royal Society (2006), Science Communication: Survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers
20. Stephen Hilgartner (1990), The Dominant View of Popularization, in Social Studies of Science 20(3): 519-539
21. R. Watermeyer (2010), Scientists and Communicators: Negotiations for a Public Science, Working Paper.
22. J. Dewey (1933), How We Think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process, (Revised edn.) Boston: D. C. Heath pg. 340.
23. RCUK (2008), Public Attitudes to Science: A Survey, People Sciences and Policy Ltd/TNS
24. T. Horlick-Jones et al. (2007), The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement, Routledge: London.
25. R. Watermeyer (2008), The Carnival of Youth: The Dramaturgy of the Sixties Counterculture, Thesis. Cardiff University.
26. B. Wynne (1991), Knowledges in Context, Science Technology and Human Values 16(1): 111-121.
27. B. Wynne (1992), Misunderstood Misunderstanding, Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science 1(3): 281-304.
28. R. Willet (2007), Technology, Pedagogy and Digital Production: A Case Study of Children Learning New Media Skills, Learning Media and Technology 32(2): 167-18.
29. M. Callon (1986), Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay, In John Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
30. S. Walden (2004), Who Knows, The Guardian. 26th October.
31. L.S. Vygotsky (1962), Thought and language, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
32. J. Bruner (1987), Actual Minds, Possible Worlds, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
33. E. Goffman (1990 [1959]), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London: Penguin.
34. S. Ziegler (2007), The (mis)education of Generation M' Learning, Media and Technology 32(1): 69-81.
35. T. Brabazon (2007), The University of Google: Education in the post-information age, VT: Ashgate.
36. S. Ziegler (2007), The (mis)education of Generation M' Learning, Media and Technology 32(1): 69-81.
37. A. Sigman (2009), Well Connected? The Biological Implications of Social Networking, Biologist 56(1): 14-20.
38. M. Thomas (2008), Handbook of research on language acquisition technologies: web 2.0 transformation of learning, Hershey PA: Information Science Publishing.
39. C. Shirky (2003), Social software and the politics of groups, http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_politics.html.
40. N. Selwyn (2007), Screw Blackboard ... do it on Facebook! An investigation of students' educational use of Facebook http://www.scribd.com/doc/513958/Facebook-seminar-paper-Selwyn.
41. F. Stutzman (2006), Adopting the Facebook: a comparative analysis, http://www.ibiblio.org/fred/pubs/stutzman_wp5.pdf.
42. R. Mason (2006), Learning technologies for adult continuing education, Studies in Continuing Education 28(2): 121-133.
43. E.J. Maloney (2007), What Web 2.0 Can Teach Us About Learning, The Chronicle of Higher Education 53: 18.
44. N. Selwyn (2007), Screw Blackboard ... do it on Facebook! An investigation of students' educational use of Facebook http://www.scribd.com/doc/513958/Facebook-seminar-paper-Selwyn.
45. J. Sarrio (2010), Tennessee Teen Expelled for Facebook Posting, http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-01-28-studentfacebook-expelled_N.htm.
46. N. Selwyn (2007), Screw Blackboard ... do it on Facebook! An investigation of students' educational use of Facebook http://www.scribd.com/doc/513958/Facebook-seminar-paper-Selwyn.
47. S. Kitto and V. Higgins (2003), Online university education: liberating the student?, Science as Culture 12(1): 23-58.
48. E.J. Maloney (2007), What Web 2.0 Can Teach Us About Learning, The Chronicle of Higher Education 53: 18.
49. S. Ziegler (2007), The (mis)education of Generation M' Learning, Media and Technology 32(1): 69-81.
50. R. Watermeyer (2008), The Carnival of Youth: The Dramaturgy of the Sixties Counterculture, Unpublished Thesis, Cardiff University.
51. S. Maasen and Weingart (2006), Democratization of Expertise?: Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, Springer: Sociology of the Sciences.
52. K. Leander and A. Frank (2006), The aesthetic production and distribution of image/subjects among online youth, E-learning 3(2): 185-206.
53. S. Maasen and Weingart (2006), Democratization of Expertise?: Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, Springer: Sociology of the Sciences.
54. J. Lave and E. Wenger (1991), Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. K. Leander and A. Frank (2006), The aesthetic production and distribution of image/subjects among online youth, E-learning 3(2): 185-206.
56. C. Davies (2007) Does access to broadband technology in schools result in a shift towards independent and active learning in classrooms?, in ed. A.Méndez-Vilas. Recent Research Developments in Learning Technologies.
57. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/audio/2009/dec/19/copenhagen-special-podcast#start-of-comments, retrieved 20/12/09.
58. D.A. Kolb (1984), Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
59. A. Kukla (2000), Social Construction and the Philosophy of Science, London: Routledge.