Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 491-504

  Korczak, Peggy A ^a   Stapells, David R ^b  

^a TOWSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH; SPEECH ARTICULATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 77955853175     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d8683d     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agung, K., Purdy, S., McMahon, C., et al. (2006). The use of cortical auditory evoked potentials to evaluate neural encoding of speech sounds in adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 559-572.
2. ANSI (1996). American National Standard Specifications for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1996). New York, American National Standards Institute.
3. Boothroyd, A. (1984). Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res, 27, 134-144.
4. Boothroyd, A. (1991). Speech perception, sensorineural hearing loss, and hearing aids. In G. Studebaker & I. Hochberg (Eds.). Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance (pp, 277-300). Austin: Pro Ed.
5. Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (1997). Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. NeuroReport, 8, 919-924.
6. Dehaene-Lambertz, G. & Baillet, S. (1998). A phonological representation in the infant brain. NeuroReport, 9, 1885-1888.
7. Dorman, M.F., Sharma, A., Gilley, P., et al. (2007). Central auditory development: Evidence from CAEP measurements in children fit with cochlear implants. J Commun Disord, 40, 284-294.
8. Durrant, J. D. & Lovrinic, J. H. (1995). Bases of hearing science. (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
9. Friederici, A.D., Friedrich, M., Weber, C. (2002). Neural manifestation of cognitive and precognitive mismatch detection in early infancy. Neuro-Report, 13, 1251-1254.
10. Golding, M., Pearce, W., Seymour, J., et al. (2007). The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and functional measures in young infants. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 117-125.
11. Greenhouse, S. W. & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95-112.
12. Jacobson, G.P., Lombardi, D.M., Gibbens, N.D., et al. (1992). The effects of stimulus frequency and recording site on the amplitude and latency of multichannel cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) component N1. Ear Hear, 13, 300-306.
13. Jaramillo, M., Ilvonen, T., Kujula, T., et al. (2001). Are different kinds of acoustic features processed differently for speech and non-speech sounds? Cogn Brain Res, 12, 459-466.
14. Korczak, P.A., Kurtzberg, D., Stapells, D.R. (2005). Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing aids on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear, 26, 165-185.
15. Kurtzberg, D., Vaughan, H.G. Kreuzer, A., et al. (1995). Developmental studies and clinical application of mismatch negativity: Problems and prospects. Ear Hear, 16, 104-116.
16. Lang, A.H., Eerola, O., Korpilahti, P., et al. (1995). Practical issues in the clinical application of mismatch negativity. Ear Hear, 16, 117-129.
17. Maiste, A.C., Wiens, A.S., Hunt, M.J., et al. (1995). Event-related potentials and the categorical perception of speech sounds. Ear Hear, 16, 68-90.
18. Mäkelä, A., Alku, P., Tiitinen, H. (2003). The auditory N1m reveals the left hemispheric representation of vowel identity in humans. Neurosci Let, 353, 111-114.
19. Martin, B.A., Kurtzberg, D., Stapells, D. R. (1999). The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the mismatch negativity to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 271-286.
20. Martin, B.A., Sigal, A., Kurtzberg, D., et al. (1997). The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 1585-1599.
21. Martin, B.A., Tremblay, K.L., Korczak, P.A. (2008). Speech evoked potentials: From the laboratory to the clinic. Ear Hear, 29, 285-313.
22. Martin, L., Barajas, J.J., Fernandez, R., et al. (1988). Auditory event-related potentials in well-characterized groups of children. Electroen-cephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 71, 375-381.
23. Morr, M.L., Shafer, V.L., Kreuzer, J.A., et al. (2002). Maturation of mismatch negativity in typically developing infants and preschool children. Ear Hear, 23, 118-136.
24. Näätänen, R. Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., et al. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432-434.
25. Oates, P.A., Kurtzberg, D., Stapells, D.R. (2002). Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear, 23, 399-415.
26. Obleser, J., Eulitz, C., Lahiri, A. (2004). Magnetic brain response mirrors extraction of phonological features from spoken vowels. J Cogn Neurosci, 16, 31-39.
27. Picton, T.W. (1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol, 96, 456-479.
28. Picton, T.W., Alain, C., Otten, L., et al. (2000). Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river. Audiol Neurootol, 5, 111-139.
29. Purdy, S.C. & Gardner-Berry, K. (2009). Auditory Evoked Potentials and cochlear implants: Research findings and clinical applications in children. Perspectives in Hearing and Hearing Disorders Childhood, 19, 4-21.
30. Purdy, S.C., Katsch, R., Dillon, H., et al. (2005). Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials for hearing instrument evaluation in infants. In R.C. Seewald & J.M. Bamford (Eds). A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification. Chicago: Phonak AG.
31. Rance, G., Cone-Wesson, B., Wunderlich, J., et al. (2002). Speech perception and cortical event related potentials in children with auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear, 23, 239-253.
32. Sams, M., Aulanko, R., Aaltonen, O., et al. (1990). Event-related potentials to infrequent changes in synthesized phonetic stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci, 2, 344-357.
33. Scherg, M., Vajsar, J., Picton, T.W. (1989). A source analysis for the late human auditory evoked potentials. J Cogn Neurosci, 1, 336-355.
34. Sharma, A. & Dorman, M. (1999). Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 1078-1083.
35. Sharma, A., Marsh, C.M., Dorman, M.F. (2000). Relationship between N1 evoked potential morphology and the perception of voicing. J Acoust Soc Am, 108, 3030-3035.
36. Sharma, A., Martin, K., Roland, P., et al. (2005). P1 latency as a biomarker for central auditory development in children with hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 564-573.
37. Steinschneider, M., Volkov, I.O., Noh, M.D., et al. (1999). Temporal encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter by field potentials recorded directly from human auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol, 82, 2346-2357.
38. Swets, J.A. (1973). Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers. New York: John Wiley.
39. Tavabi, K., Elling, L., Dobel, C., et al. (2009). Effects of place of articulation changes on auditory neural activity: A magnetoencephalography study. PloS ONE, 4, 1-7.
40. Taylor, M.J. (1988). Developmental changes in ERPs to visual language stimuli. Biol Psychol, 26, 321-338.
41. Trainor, L.J., McFadden, M., Hodgson, L., et al. (2003). Changes in auditory cortex and the development of mismatch negativity between 2 and 6 months of age. Int J Psychophysiol, 51, 5-15.
42. Trainor, L.J., Samuel, S.S., Desjardins, R., et al. (2001). Measuring temporal resolution in infants using mismatch negativity. NeuroReport, 12, 2443-2448.
43. Tremblay, K.L., Piskosz, M., Souza, P. (2002). Aging alters the neural representation of speech cues. NeuroReport, 13, 1865-1870.
44. Tremblay, K.L., Piskosz, M., Souza, P. (2003). Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clin Neurophysiol, 114, 1332-1343.
45. Vaughan, H.G. Ritter, W. (1970). The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 28, 360-367.
46. Walden, B.E. (1984). Speech perception of the hearing impaired. In J. Jerger (Ed.). Hearing Disorders in Adults (pp, 263-309). California: College-Hill Press.
47. Whiting, K.A., Martin, B.A., Stapells, D.R. (1998). The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. Ear Hear, 19, 218-231.
48. Wunderlich, J.L., Cone-Wesson, B.K., Shepherd, R. (2006). Maturation of the cortical auditory evoked potential in infants and young children. Hear Res, 212, 185-202.
49. Yanz, J.L. (1984). The application of the theory of signal detection to the assessment of speech perception. Ear Hear, 5, 64-71.
50. Yetkin, F.Z., Roland, P.S., Christensen, W.F., et al. (2004). Silent functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) of tonotopicity and stimulus intensity coding in human primary auditory cortex. Laryngoscope, 114, 512-518.
51. Ylinen, S., Shestakova, A., Huotilainen, M., et al. (2006). Mismatch negativity (MMN) elicited by changes in phoneme length: A cross-linguistic study. Brain Res, 1072, 175-185.