Issues on school e-laboratories in science teaching: Virtuality, Reality and gender

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 171, Issue , 2005, Pages 43-58

  Juuti, Kalle ^a   Lavonen, Jari ^a   Meisalo, Veijo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Gender; ICT use; Science teaching; Self evaluation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; MODEMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PERSONNEL TRAINING; STUDENTS; TEACHING; TELLURIUM COMPOUNDS;

GENDER; ICT USE; IN-SERVICE TRAINING; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; SCIENCE TEACHING; SELF EVALUATION;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 77955841967     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Cohen, V.L. (1997) Implications for Learning in a Technology-Rich School. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 8(2), 153-74.
2. Davies, N. (1998) Developing Telecommunications within European Teacher Education: Progress, Plans, and Policy. In the Proceedings SITE 98: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (9th, Washington, DC, March 10-14, 1998). ERIC ED421160.
3. Directorate-General for Education and Culture (2001). European Report on the Quality of School Education. Sixteen Quality Indicators. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
4. Fairbrother, R. (2000). Strategies for learning. In M. Monk & J. Osborne (eds.) Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say. Buckingham: Open University Press, 7-22.
5. Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12, 447-465.
6. Ilomäki, L. & Rahikainen, M. (2001). Teachers, students and ICT: Different cultures of use. The Finnish Journal of Education, Kasvatus 32, 24-35.
7. Jonassen, D., Mayes, T., McAleese, R. (1992). A manifesto for a constructivist approach to technology in higher education. In T. Duffy, D. Jonassen, & J. Lowyck (eds.) Designing constructivist learning environments. Heidelberg, FRG: Springer-Verlag.
8. Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Kallunki, V. and Meisalo, V. (2003). Studying Newtonian mechanics in a virtual and real learning environment in an elementary school. Proceedings of the ESERA 2003 Conference: Research and Quality of Science Education, August 19.-23.2003, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. Paper available in the Internet: http://wwwl.phvs.uu.nl/esera2003/prograinine/authors.htm (retrieved 11.2.2004).
9. Juuti, K, Lavonen, J. & Meisalo V. (2003). Phenomenographical Approach to Design for a Hypertext Teachers Guide to MBL. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis G. Fassoulopoulos, & M. Kallery (eds.) Science Education in the Knowledge-Based Society. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 333-341
10. th Annual Conference of the Finnish Mathematics and Science Education Research Association. Helsinki: Department of Applied Sciences of Education, University of Helsinki.
11. Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., and Meisalo, V. (2004). Learning Newtonian Mechanics in Virtual and Real Learning Environments in Grade 6 in a Finnish Primary School. In V. Uskov (ed.), Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Web-Based Education February 16-18, 2004, Innsbruck, Austria. Anaheim: ACTA Press, 567-572.
12. Lavonen, J., Juuti, K., Byman, R., Meisalo, V. Koponen, I. & Saloranta, S. (2003). Teaching and Studying Physics and Chemistry in Upper Secondary Schools: A Survey of the Students' Perspective in Finland. In L. Haapasalo & K. Sormunen (eds.). Towards Meaningful Mathematics and Science Education. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Finnish Mathematics and Science Education Research Association in Joensuu 27.-28.9.2002. Bulletins of the faculty of education N:o 86. University of Joensuu, 162-180.
13. Lavonen, J., Juuti, K., Byman, R., Uitto, A. & Meisalo, V. (2004). Teaching Methods in Ninth Grade Finnish Comprehensive School: A Survey of Student Expectations. In R.M. Janiuk & E. Samonek-Miciuk (eds.). Proceedings of the International Organization for Science and Technology Education (IOSTE) XI Symposium (Science and Technology Education for a Diverse World-Dilemmas, needs and partnership), 25.-30. July, Lublin, Poland. Lublin: Maria Curie-Sklodowska University Press, 157-158.
14. Lorsbach, A. and Tobin, K., 1995, Toward a Critical Approaches to the Study of Learning Environments in Science Classrooms. Research in Science Education, 25(1), 19-32.
15. Maor, D. & Taylor, P.C. (1995) Teacher Epistemology and Scientific Inquiry in Computerized Classroom Environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 12(8), 839-854.
16. Masui, C. & De Corte, E. (1999) Enhancing learning and problem solving skills: orienting and self-judging, two powerful and trainable learning tools, Learning and Instruction 9, 517-542.
17. McFarlane, A. & Sakellariou, S. (2002). The Role of ICT in Science Education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32 (2), 221-232.
18. Meisalo, V. & Lavonen, J. (1997). The Luonti project and Network to promote teaching of Experimental Science. In N. Ephraty & R. Lidor (eds.). The Second International Conference on Teacher education: Stability, evolution and revolution. 1.-4.7.1996. Israel: Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport, Department of Teacher Education Mofet Institute, 1155-1161.
19. + Project. In K. Nielsen & A. Ch. Paulsen (eds.): Practical Work in Science Education-the Face of Science in Schools. Copenhagen: Royal Danish School of Educational Studies, 174-186.
20. Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7-18.
21. Moursund, D. & Bielefeldt, T. (1999) Will New Teachers Be Prepared To Teach in a Digital Age? A National Survey on Information Technology in Teacher Education, International Society for Technology in Education. ERIC ED428072.
22. NBE. (1994). Framework curriculum for the senior secondary school. Helsinki: State Printing Press and National Board of Education.
23. Novak, J. D. (1998) Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Human Constructivism. In J. J Mintzes, J. H Wandersee & J.D. Novak (eds), Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivistic View. San Diego: Academic Press, 5-27.
24. Osborne, J. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049-1079.
25. SETRIS. (2000). Education, Training and Research in the Information Society: A National Strategy for 2000-2004. Helsinki: Ministry of Education. [http://www.minedu.fi/julkaisut/information/englishU/index.html] (retrieved 11.2.2004).
26. Sinko, M. and Lehtinen, E. (1999). The Challenges of ICT in Finnish Education. Helsinki: Atena.
27. Webb, M. (2002). Pedagogical reasoning: Issues and solutions for the Teaching and learning of ICT in Secondary School. Education and Information Technologies 7(3), 237-255.
28. Wiesenmayer, R. & Koul, R. (1998). Integrating Internet Resources into the Science Classroom: Teachers' perspectives. Journal of Science Education and Technology 7(3), 271-277.