A kind of expertise reversal effect: Personalisation effect can depend on domain-specific prior knowledge

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 133-149

  Stiller, Klaus D ^a   Jedlicka, Rosemarie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955836340     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1107     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bortz, J. (2005). Statistik für Human-und Sozialwissenschaftler [Statistics for human and social sciences]. Heidelberg: Springer.
2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Erlbaum.
3. Cortina, J. M. & Nouri, H. (2000). Effect sizes for ANOVA designs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Hidi, S. & Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 465-483.
5. Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509-539.
6. Keller, J. M. & Suzuki, K. (1988). Use of the ARCS motivation model in courseware design. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 289-320). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Lepper, M. R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues. American Psychologist, 40, 1-18.
8. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Mayer, R. E. (2005a). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 169-182). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Mayer, R. E. (2005b). Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: Personalization, voice, and image principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 201-212). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11. Mayer, R. E. Fennell, S., Farmer, L. & Campbell, J. (2004). A personalization effect in multimedia learning: Students learn better when words are in conversational style rather than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 389-395.
12. Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2000). Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 724-733.
13. Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 165-173.
14. Olejnik, S. F. & Algina, J. (1984). Parametric ANCOVA and the Rank Transform ANCOVA when the data are conditionally non-normal and heteroscedastic. Journal of Educational Statistics, 9, 129-149.
15. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Predictive validity and reliability of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
16. Reeves, B. & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S. & Krapp, A (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A. & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677-688.
19. Schiefele, U. (1990). Thematisches Interesse, Variablen des Leseprozesses und Textverstehen [Topic interest, reading process variables, and text comprehension]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 37, 304-332.
20. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interesse und Textrepräsentation Zur Auswirkung des thematischen Interesses auf unterschiedliche Komponenten der Textrepräsentation unter Berücksichtigung kognitiver und motivationaler Kontrollvariablen [Interest and text representation: The influence of topic interest on different components of text representation]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 5, 245-259.
21. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press.
22. Symons, C. S. & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371-394.
23. Turco, R. M. (1996). Self-referencing, quality of argument, and persuasion. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 15, 258-276.
24. Wade, S. E. (1992). How interest affects learning from text. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 255-277). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Weinstein, C. E. (1987). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing Company.
26. Williams, M. D. (1996). Learner-control and instructional techniques. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 957-983). New York: Macmillan.
27. Wu, Y. B. (1984). The effects of heterogenous regression slopes on the robustness of two test statistics in the analysis of covariance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 647-663.