Use of audience response systems for summative assessment in large classes

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 226-237

  Hancock, Terence M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955786627     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1092     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allen, D. & Tanner, K. (2005). Infusing active learning into the large-enrolment biology class: Seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biology Education, 4, 262-268. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1305885.
2. Barber, M. & Njus, D. (2007). Clicker evolution: Seeking intelligent design. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 1-8.
3. Barnett, J. (2006). Implementation of personal response units in very large lecture classes: Student perceptions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 474-494. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet22/barnett.html.
4. Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J. & Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 31-39.
5. Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20. http://www.lifescied.org/cgi/reprint/6/1/9.pdf.
6. Draper, S., Cargill, J. & Cutts, Q. (2002). Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(1), 13-23. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet18/draper.html.
7. Dufresne, R. J. & Gerace, W. J. (2004). Assessing-to-learn: Formative assessment in physics instruction. The Physics Teacher, 42, 428-433.
8. Fies, C. & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101-109.
9. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
10. i>clicker (undated). i>clicker mainsite. http://www.iclicker.com/.
11. Kay, R. & LeSage, A. (2009). A strategic assessment of audience response systems used in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 235-249. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/kay.html.
12. Knight, J. K. & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 4, 298-310.
13. Poulis, J., Massen, C., Robens, E. & Gilbert, M. (1998). Physics lecturing with audience paced feedback. American Journal of Physics, 66(5), 439-441.
14. Preszler, R. W., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B. & Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 29-41. http://www.lifescied.org/cgi/content/full/6/1/29.
15. Simpson, V. & Oliver, M. (2007). Electronic voting systems for lectures then and now: A comparison of research and practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 187-208. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/simpson.html.
16. Sharma, M. D., Khachan, J., Chan, B. & O'Byrne, J. (2005). An investigation of the effectiveness of electronic classroom communication systems in large lecture classes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(2), 137-154. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/sharma.html.