MNCs and international accountability standards through an institutional lens: Evidence of symbolic conformity or decoupling

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 95, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 617-640

  Jamali, Dima ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT   (Lebanon)

Author keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility; Institutional Theory; International Accountability Standards; Multinational Corporations

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955774139     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0443-z     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ang, S. and Cummings, L. (1997). Strategic Response to Institutional Influences on Information Systems Outsourcing. Organization Science, 8 (3), pp. 235-256.
2. Blowfield, M. and Frynas, J., G. (2005). Setting New Agendas: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Development of the Developing World. International Affairs, 81 (3), pp. 499-513.
3. Carriga, E. and Melé, P. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, pp. 51-71.
4. Christensen, T. and Lagreid, P. (2003). Administrative Reform Policy: The Challenges of Turning Symbols into Practice. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 3, pp. 3-27.
5. Darnall, N. (2003). Why Firms Certify to ISO 14001: An Institutional and Resource Based View. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper, 2003.
6. Davis, G. and Marquis, C. (2005). Prospects for Organization Theory in the early Twenty-First Century: Institutional Fields and Mechanisms. Organization Science, 16 (4), pp. 332-343.
7. Delmas, M. (2002). The Diffusion of Environmental Management Standards in Europe and the United States: An Institutional Perspective. Policy Sciences, 35, pp. 91-119.
8. Delmas, M. and Montiel, I. (2008). The Diffusion of Voluntary International Management Standards: Responsible Care, ISO 9000, and ISO 14001 in the Chemical Industry. The Policy Studies Journal, 36 (1), pp. 65-93.
9. Denscombe, M. (2003). The Good Research Guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
10. DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.) Institutional Patterns and Organizations. Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 3-22.
11. DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, pp. 147-160.
12. Doane, D. (2005). Beyond Corporate Social Responsibility: Minnows, Mammoths and Markets. Futures, 37 (2/3), pp. 215-229.
13. Fombrun, C., J. (2005). Building Corporate Reputation through CSR Initiatives: Evolving Standards. Corporate Reputation Review, 8 (1), pp. 7-11.
14. Gephart, R. (2004). Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy ofManagement Journal, 47 (4), pp. 454-462.
15. Goodrick, E. and Salancik, G. (1996). Organizational Discretion in Responding to Institutional Practices: Hospitals and Cesarean Births. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (1), pp. 1-28.
16. Goodstein, J. (1994). Institutional Pressures and Strategic Responsiveness: Employer Involvement in Work Family Issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp. 350-382.
17. Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C. (1996). Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review, 21 (4), pp. 1022-1054.
18. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R. and Hinings, C. (2002). Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutional Fields. The Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1), pp. 58-80.
19. Hamann R. and Acutt, N (2003). How Should Civil Society (and the government) Respond to Corporate Social Responsibility'? A Critique of Business Motivations and the Potential for Partnerships. Development Southern Africa, 20 (2), pp. 255-270.
20. Hiscox, M. J., C. Schwartz and M. W. Tofeel: 2008, Evaluating the Impact of SA8000 Certification, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper No. 47. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
21. Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the US Chemical Industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (4), pp. 351-371.
22. Jamali, D. (2006). Insights into Triple Bottom Line Integration from a Learning Organization Perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 12 (6), pp. 809-821.
23. Jamali, D. (2008). A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective into Theory and Practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, pp. 213-231.
24. King, A. and Lenox, M. (2000). Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry's Responsible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), pp. 698-716.
25. Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2004). Transnational Corporations and Public Accountability, Government and Opposition, 39 (2), 234-259.
26. Kolk A., van Tulder R., Welters, C. (1999). International Codes of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility: Can Transnational Corporations Regulate Themselves?. Transnational Corporations 8 (1): 143-180.
27. Levis, J. (2006). Adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility Codes by Multinational Companies. Journal of Asian Economics, 17, pp. 50-55.
28. Logsdon, J., M. and Lewellyn, P., G. (2000). Expanding Accountability to Stakeholders: Trends and Predictions. Business and Society Review, 105 (4), pp. 419-435.
29. Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional Transformation and Status Mobility: The Professionalization of the Field of Finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1), pp. 255-266.
30. Marsden C. (2000) The New Corporate Citizenship of Big Business: Part of the Solution to Sustainability?. Business and Society Review 105 (1): 9-25.
31. Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and Explicit CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 33 (2), pp. 404-424.
32. Meho, L. (2006). E-mail Interviewing in Qualitative Research: A Methodological Discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (10), pp. 1284-1295.
33. Mohan, A. (2006). Global Corporate Social Responsibilities Management in MNCs. Journal of Business Strategies, 23 (1), pp. 9-32.
34. Monshipouri, M., Welch, C., E. Jr. and Kennedy, E. T. (2004). Multinational Corporations and the Ethics of Global Responsibilities: Problems and Possibilities. Human Rights Quarterly, 25, pp. 965-989.
35. Ogawa, R. and Scribner, S. (2002). Leadership: Spanning the Technical and Institutional Dimensions of Organizations. Journal of Educational Administration, 40 (6), pp. 576-588.
36. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), pp. 145-179.
37. rd edn. London: Sage.
38. Pearson, R. and Seyfang, G. (2001). New Hope or False Down? Voluntary Codes of Conduct, Labour Regulation and Social Policy in a Globalizing World. Global Social Policy, 1 (49), pp. 49-78.
39. nd Edition). New York: Random House.
40. Perrow, C. (1985). Review Essay: Overboard with Myth and Symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (1): pp. 51-155.
41. Rasche, A. and M. Behnam: 2008, Towards a Model to Compare and Evaluate Accountability Standards - The Case of the UN Global Compact, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim.
42. Rasche, A. and Esser, D., E. (2006). From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, pp. 251-267.
43. Roberts, P. and Greenwood, R. (1997). Integrating Transaction Cost and Institutional Theories: Toward a Constrained Efficiency Framework for Understanding Organizational Design Adoption. Academy of Management Review, 22 (2), pp. 346-373.
44. Rohitratana, K. (2002). SA8000: A Tool to Improve Quality of Life. Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(1/2), pp. 60-64.
45. Ruggie, J., G. (2002). The Theory and Practice of Learning Networks: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Global Compact. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 5, pp. 27-36.
46. Sahlin-Andersson K. (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility: A Trend and a Movement, but of What and for What?. Corporate Governance 6 (5): 595-608.
47. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
48. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Sage. Thousand Oaks, California.
49. Shamir, R. (2004). Between Self-Regulation and the Alien Tort Claims Act: On the Contested Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility. Law & Society, 38 (4), pp. 635-664.
50. Tolbert, P. and Zucker, L. (1996). The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord (Eds.). Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 22-39.
51. United Nations Global Compact: 2009, 'Policy for Communication on Progress', http://www. unglobalcompact. org/cop/inactives. html and http://www. unglobalcompact. org/cop/non_communicating. html. Accessed 15 Feb 2009.
52. Waddock, S. (2004a). Creating Corporate Accountability: Foundation Principles to Make Corporate Citizenship Real. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, pp. 313-327.
53. Waddock, S. (2004b). Parallel Universes: Companies, Academics and the Progress of Corporate Citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109 (1), pp. 5-42.
54. Waddock, S. (2008). Building a New Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate Responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22 (3), pp. 87-108.
55. Weaver, G., Trevino, L. and Cochran, P. (1999). Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures and Corporate Ethics Practices, Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5), pp. 539-552.
56. Westphal J. and Zajac, E. (2001). De-Coupling Policy from Practice: The Case of Stock Repurchase Programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (2), pp. 202-228.
57. Whitehouse, L. (2003) Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Citizenship and the Global Compact, A New Approach to Regulating Corporate Social Power?. Global Social Policy 3(3): 299-318.
58. Williams, O., F. (2004). The UN Global Compact: The Challenge and the Promise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14 (4), pp. 755-774.
59. Willke, H. Willke, G. (2008) The Corporation as a Political Actor? A Systems Theory Perspective. In: Scherer, A. Palazzo, G., Eds., Handbook of Research on Global Citizenship, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 552-574.
60. Zucker, L. (1987). Normal change or Risky Business: Institutional Effects on the Hazard of Change in Hospital Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 34, pp. 671-701.