Phonology and perception: A cognitive scientist's perspective

Phonology in Perception

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 293-314

  McClelland, James L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955761371     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock, and Hedderik van Rijn 1993 The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Balas, Anna this volume Why can Poles hear "Sprite", but not "Coca-Cola"? A Natural Phonological account.
3. Boersma, Paul 1998 Functional Phonology: Formalizing the Interactions Between Arti-culatory and Perceptual Drives. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
4. Boersma, Paul this volume Phonological perception as an interplay between structural and cue constraints.
5. Boersma, Paul, and Silke Hamann 2008 The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. Phonology 25: 217-270.
6. Boersma, Paul, and Silke Hamann this volume Introduction: models of phonology in perception.
7. Burzio, Luigi 2000 Missing players: phonology and the past-tense debate. In: Kleanthes K. Grohmann and Caro Struijke (eds.), University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 73-112.
8. Bybee, Joan L. 2001 Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cutting, James E., Burton S. Rosner and Christopher F. Foard 1976 Perceptual categories for musiclike sounds: implications for theories of speech perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 28: 361-378.
10. Dilkina, Katia, James L. McClelland and David C. Plaut 2008 A single-system account of semantic and lexical deficits in five semantic dementia patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology 25: 136-164.
11. Flemming, Edward 1995 Auditory Representations in Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Published London and New York: Routledge [2002].
12. Fodor, Jerry A. 1983 Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
13. Harris, John 1994 English Sound Structure. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Hay, Jennifer 2001 Lexical frequency in morphology: is everything relative? Linguistics 39: 1041-1070.
15. Hayes, Bruce, and Colin Wilson 2008 A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 379-440.
16. Hickok, Gregory, and David Poeppel 2004 Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92: 67-99.
17. Keidel, James L., Jason D. Zevin, Keith R. Kluender, and Mark S. Seidenberg 2003 Modeling the role of native language knowledge in perceiving nonnative speech contrasts. In: Marie-Josep Solé, Daniel Recasens and Joaquín Romero (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2221-2224. Barcelona.
18. Kuhl, Patricia K. 1991 Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics 50: 93-107.
19. Kuhl, Patricia K., and James D. Miller 1975 Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science 190: 69-72.
20. Levelt, Willem J. M., Ardi Roelofs, and Antje S. Meyer 1999 A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 1-38.
21. Liberman, Alvin M. 1996 Speech: A Special Code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Lindblom, Björn, Peter F. MacNeilage, and Michael Studdert-Kennedy 1984 Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals. In: Brian Butterworth, Bernard Comrie and Osten Dahl (eds.), Explanations for Language Universals, 181-203. Berlin: Mouton.
23. Lotto, Andrew J., and Keith R. Kluender 1998 General contrast effects in speech perception: effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception & Psychophysics 60: 602-619.
24. McClelland, James L., and Jeffrey L. Elman 1986 The TRACE Model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18: 1-86.
25. McClelland, James L., Timothy T. Rogers, Karalyn Patterson, Katia N. Dilkina, and Matthew R. Lambon Ralph in press Semantic cognition: its nature, its development, and its neural basis. In: Michael Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences IV. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
26. McClelland, James L., and David E. Rumelhart 1981 An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part 2: an account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88: 375-407.
27. McClelland, James L., and Brent C. Vander Wyk 2006 Graded constraints in English word forms. Manuscript, Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University.
28. Mechelli, Andrea, Jennifer T. Crinion, Steven Long, Karl J. Friston, Matthew R. Lam-bon Ralph, Karalyn Patterson, James L. McClelland, and Cathy J. Price 2005 Dissociating reading processes on the basis of neuronal interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17: 1753-1765.
29. Mirman, Daniel, Lori L. Holt, and James L. McClelland 2004 Categorization and discrimination of non-speech sounds: differences between steady-state and rapidly-changing acoustic cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116: 1198-1207.
30. Pierrehumbert, Janet 2001 Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition and contrast. In: Joan L. Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, 137-157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31. Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky 2004 Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Rogers, Timothy T., Matthew R. Lambon Ralph, Peter Garrard, Sasha Bozeat, James L. McClelland, John R. Hodges, and Karalyn Patterson 2004 The structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review 111: 205-235.
33. Vander Wyk, Brent C., and James L. McClelland in preparation Constraints affecting occurrence rates of English word forms also affect spoken word duration.
34. Wade, Travis, and Lori L. Holt 2005 Effects of later-occurring non-linguistic sounds on speech categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118: 1701-1710.