The role of peer feedback in learning to write explanatory texts: Why the tutors learn the most

Language Awareness

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 111-128

  Crinon, Jacques ^a,b,c   Marin, Brigitte ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

^c GDR CNRS Production verbale écrite   (France)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Interaction; Literacy practices; Metalinguistic awareness; Writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955761268     PISSN: 09658416     EISSN: 17477506     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658411003746604     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Allal, L., Mottier Lopez, L., Lehraus, K., & Forget, A. (2005). Whole-class and peer interaction in an activity of writing and revision. In T. Kostouli (Ed.), Writing in context(s) (pp. 69-91). New York: Springer.
3. Astolfi, J.-P., Darot, É., Ginsburger-Vogel, Y., & Toussaint, J. (1997). Mots-clefs de la didactique des sciences [Keywords in the teaching of science]. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
4. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Esthétique de la création verbale [The aesthetics of artistic verbal création]. Paris: Gallimard.
5. Bautier, É́. (2005). Formes et activités scolaires, secondarisation, reconfiguration, différenciation sociale [Forms and school activities, secondarisation, reconfiguration, social différentiation]. In N. Ramognino & P. Vergès (Eds.), Le Français hier et aujourd'hui. Politiques de la langue et apprentissages scolaires. Études offertes à V. Isambert-Jamati [French yesterday and today. Language policies and education. Studies in honor of V. Isambert-Jamati] (pp. 49-67). Aix: Publications de l'Université de Provence.
6. Bernié, J.-P. (2001). Genres discursifs scolaires, genres de l'activité et conceptualisation [Educational discourse genres, activity genres and conceptualisation genres]. In J.-P. Bernié (Ed.), Apprentissage, développement et significations [Learning, development, and meaning] (pp. 155-171). Pessac: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.
7. Boscolo, P., & Ascorti, K. (2004). Effects of collaborative revision on children's ability to write understandable narrative texts. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 157-170). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Brown, A.L., & Palincsar, A.S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 1-17.
9. Campione, J.C., Shapiro, A.M., & Brown, A.L. (1995). Forms of transfer in a community of learners: Flexible learning and understanding. In A. McKeough, J.L. Lupart, & A. Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning (pp. 35-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Chanquoy, L. (2001). How to make it easier for children to revise their writing: A study of text revision from 3rd to 5th grades. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 15-41.
11. Chevallard, Y. (1999). L'analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique [The analysis of teaching practices in the anthropological theory of teaching]. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 19(2), 221-265.
12. Crinon, J. (2006). Lire et écrire la fiction: Quelques malentendus [Reading and writing fiction: Some misunderstandings]. Repères, 33, 61-79.
13. Crinon, J., Marin, B., & Cautela, A. (2008). Comprendre la révision collaborative: Élaborer ou utiliser des critiques [Understanding collaborative revision: Developing criticisms and using them]. Communication au Congrès mondial de linguistique française (CMLF 08), Paris, July 9-12, 2008. Retrieved 1, 2009, from http://www.linguistiquefrancaise.org
14. Crinon, J., Marin, B., & Legros, D. (2003). L'impact de la collaboration à distance sur l'apprentissage des temps du récit au cycle 3 [The influence of distance collaboration in learning the narrative tense in cycle 3]. In C. Desmoulins (Ed.), Actes de la conférence EIAH (Environnements Informatiques pour l'Apprentissage Humain). Strasbourg, April 15-17, 2003 (pp. 103-114). Retrieved 1, 2009, from http://archiveseiah.univ-lemans.fr/EIAH2003/
15. Daiute, C. (1986). Do 1 and 1 make 2? Patterns of influence by collaborative authors. Written Communication, 3, 382-408.
16. Gilly, M., Roux, J.-P., & Trognon, A. (Éds.). (1999). Apprendre dans l'interaction [Learning in interaction]. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy, et Aix, Publications de l'Université de Provence.
17. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476.
18. Hayes, J.R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 1-28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Holliway, D.R., & McCutchen, D. (2004). Audience perspective in Young writers' composing and revising. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 87-101). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Jaubert, M. (2001). Cohérence textuelle et positionnement énonciatif contextuellement pertinent en classe de science [Textual coherence and relevant enunciative contextual positioning in science class]. In J.-P. Bernié (Ed.), Apprentissage, développement et significations [Learning, development, and meaning] (pp. 173-189). Pessac: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.
21. Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lindgren, E. (2004). The uptake of peer-based intervention in the writing classroom. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Effective learning and teaching of writing, a handbook of writing in education (2nd ed., pp. 259-274). New York: Springer.
24. MacArthur, C.A., Schwartz, S.S., & Graham, S. (1991). Effects of a reciprocal peer revision strategy in special education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6(4), 201-210.
25. Marin, B. (2007). Culture écrite, culture orale: des ressources spécifiques [Written culture, oral culture: Specific resources]. La Linguistique, 43(2), 105-121.
26. Olson, D.R. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Orange, C. (2005). Problématisation et conceptualisation en sciences et dans les apprentissages scientifiques [Conceptualisation and problematisation in science and scientific learning]. Les sciences de l'éducation pour l'ère nouvelle, 38(3), 69-94.
28. Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 139-158.
29. Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Raedts, M., van Steendam, E., et al. (2008). Observations of peers in learning to write. Practise and research. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 53-83. Retrieved 1, 2009, from http://www.jowr.org/current.html
30. Roscoe, R.D., & Chi, M.T.H. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors' explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534-574.
31. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In S. Rosenberg (ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics, Vol. 2. Reading, writing and language learning (pp. 142-175). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
32. Schriver, K.A. (1992). Teaching writing to anticipate readers' needs: A classroom-evaluated pedagogy. Written Communication, 9(2), 179-208.
33. Shanahan, T. (1984). Nature of the reading-writing relation: An exploratory multivariate analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 466-477.
34. Warschauer, M.(2007). Technology and writing.In C.Davison&J.Cummins (Eds.),The international handbook of English language teaching (pp. 907-912). Norwell, MA: Springer.
35. Zammuner, V.L. (1995). Individual and cooperative computer-writing and revising: Who gets the best results? Learning and Instruction, 5(2), 101-124.