Increasing task difficulty enhances effects of intersensory redundancy: testing a new prediction of the Intersensory Redundancy Hypothesis

Developmental Science

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 731-737

  Bahrick, Lorraine E ^a   Lickliter, Robert ^a   Castellanos, Irina ^a   Vaillant Molina, Mariana ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HEARING; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; ORIENTATION; VISION;

ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; ORIENTATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77955752684     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: 14677687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00928.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adler SA, Rovee-Collier C. The memorability and discriminability of primitive perceptual units in infancy. Vision Research 1994, 34:449-459.
2. Adolph KE. Learning in the development of infant locomotion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1997, 62. (3, Serial No. 251)
3. Adolph KE. Learning to keep balance. Advances in child development and behavior 2002, 1-40. Kail R. In, Ed, Vol. 30, pp, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science
4. Adolph KE, Berger SE. Physical and motor development. Developmental science: An advanced textbook 2005, 223-281. Bornstein MH, Lamb ME. In, Eds, 5th edn, pp, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
5. Bahrick LE. Infants' perceptual differentiation of amodal and modality-specific audio-visual relations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1992, 53:180-199.
6. Bahrick LE. The development of infants' sensitivity to arbitrary intermodal relations. Ecological Psychology 1994, 6:111-123.
7. Bahrick LE. Increasing specificity in perceptual development: infants' detection of nested levels of multimodal stimulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2001, 79:253-270.
8. Bahrick LE. Intermodal perception and selective attention to intersensory redundancy: implications for typical social development and autism. Blackwell handbook of infant development Bremner GWachs TD. In, Eds, 2nd edn, London, Blackwell Publishing
9. Bahrick LE, Flom R, Lickliter R. Intersensory redundancy facilitates discrimination of tempo in 3-month-old infants. Developmental Psychobiology 2002a, 41:352-363.
10. Bahrick LE, Gogate LJ, Ruiz I. Attention and memory for faces and actions in infancy: the salience of actions over faces in dynamic events. Child Development 2002b, 73:1629-1643.
11. Bahrick LE, Lickliter R. Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Developmental Psychology 2000, 36:190-201.
12. Bahrick LE, Lickliter R. Intersensory redundancy guides early perceptual and cognitive development. Advances in child development and behavior 2002, 153-187. Kail R, In, Ed, Vol. 30, pp, New York, Academic Press
13. Bahrick LE, Lickliter R. Infants' perception of rhythm and tempo in unimodal and multimodal stimulation: a developmental test of the intersensory redundancy hypothesis. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 4:137-147.
14. Bahrick LE, Lickliter R, Flom R. Up versus down: the role of intersensory redundancy in infants' sensitivity to object orientation and motion. Infancy 2006, 9:73-96.
15. Bahrick LE, Newell LC. Infant discrimination of faces in naturalistic events: actions are more salient than faces. Developmental Psychology 2008, 44:983-996.
16. Bahrick LE, Pickens J. Amodal relations: the basis for intermodal perception and learning in infancy. The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives 1994, 205-233. Lewkowicz DJ, Lickliter R. In, Eds, pp, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
17. Bahrick LE, Pickens J. Infant memory for object motion across a period of three months: implications for a four-phase attention function. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1995, 59:343-371.
18. Berger SE. Demands on finite cognitive capacity cause infants' perseverative errors. Infancy 2004, 5:217-238.
19. Colombo J, Mitchell DW. Individual and developmental differences in infant visual attention: fixation time and information processing. Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, and prediction 1990, 193-227. Colombo J, Fagen JW. In, Eds, pp, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum
20. Colombo J, Mitchell DW, Coldren JT, Freeseman LJ. Individual differences in infant visual attention: are short lookers faster processors or feature processors? Child Development 1991, 62:1247-1257.
21. Corbetta D, Bojczyk KE. Infants return to two-handed reaching when they are learning to walk. Journal of Motor Behavior 2002, 34:83-95.
22. Craik FI, Lockhart RS. Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1972, 11:671-684.
23. Flom R, Bahrick LE. The development of infant discrimination of affect in multimodal and unimodal stimulation: the role of intersensory redundancy. Developmental Psychology 2007, 43:238-252.
24. Flom R, Bahrick LE. The effects of intersensory redundancy on attention and memory: infants' long-term memory for orientation in audiovisual events. under review
25. Frick JE, Colombo J, Saxon TF. Individual and developmental differences in disengagement of fixation in early infancy. Child Development 1999, 70:537-548.
26. Gibson EJ. Principles of perceptual learning and development 1969, East Norwalk, CT, Appleton-Century-Crofts
27. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception 1979, Boston, MA, Houghton, Mifflin and Company
28. Hale S. A global developmental trend in cognitive processing speed. Child Development 1990, 61:653-663.
29. Horowitz FD. Visual attention, auditory stimulation, and language discrimination in young infants. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1975, 39. 5-6, Serial No. 158
30. Horowitz FD, Paden L, Bhana K, Self P. An infant-control procedure for studying infant visual fixations. Developmental Psychology 1972, 7:90.
31. Hunter MA, Ames EW. A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. Advances in infancy research 1988, 69-95. Rovee-Collier C, Lipsitt LP. In, Eds, Vol. 5, pp, Norwood, NJ, Ablex
32. Lewkowicz DJ. The development of intersensory temporal perception: an epigenetic systems/limitations view. Psychological Bulletin 2000, 126:281-308.
33. Lewkowicz DJ. Infant perception of audio-visual speech synchrony. Developmental Psychology
34. Lewkowicz DJ, Leo I, Simion F. Intersensory perception at birth: newborns match non-human primate faces and voices. Infancy
35. Lickliter R, Bahrick LE, Honeycutt H. Intersensory redundancy facilitates perceptual learning in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychology 2002, 38:15-23.
36. Lickliter R, Bahrick LE, Honeycutt H. Intersensory redundancy enhances memory in bobwhite quail embryos. Infancy 2004, 5:253-269.
37. Lickliter R, Bahrick LE, Markham RG. Intersensory redundancy educates selective attention in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Science 2006, 9:604-615.
38. Oakes LM, Madole KL. Function revisited: how infants construe functional features in their representation of objects. Advances in child development and behavior 2008, 135-185. Kail R, In, Ed, Vol. 36, pp, New York, Academic Press
39. Rose SA, Feldman JF, Jankowski JJ. Attention and recognition memory in the 1st year of life: a longitudinal study of preterm and full-term infants. Developmental Psychology 2001, 37:135-151.
40. Rose SA, Gottfried AW, Carminar PM, Bridger WH. Familiarity and novelty preferences in infant recognition memory: implications for information processing. Developmental Psychology 1982, 18:704-713.