Relationships between migration rates and landscape resistance assessed using individual-based simulations

Molecular Ecology Resources

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 854-862

  Landguth, E L ^a,b   Cushman, S A ^b   Murphy, M A ^c   Luikart, G ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^d CENTRO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE E RECURSOS GENÉTICOS   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Computer simulation; FST; Gene flow; Habitat fragmentation; Isolation by distance; Landscape genetics; Partial barriers; Population connectivity; Spatial statistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955728073     PISSN: 1755098X     EISSN: 17550998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02867.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Antolin MF, Savage LT, Eisen RJ. Landscape features influence genetic structure of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Landscape Ecology 2006, 21:867-875.
2. Balkenhol N, Gugerli F, Cushman SA. Identifying future research needs in landscape genetics: where to from here? Landscape Ecology 2009a, 24:455-463.
3. Balkenhol N, Waits LP, Dezzani RJ. Statistical approaches in landscape genetics: an evaluation of methods for linking landscape and genetic data. Ecography 2009b, 32:818-830.
4. Balloux F. EASYPOP (Version 1.7): a computer program for population genetics simulations. Journal of Heredity 2001, 92:301-302.
5. Currat M, Ray N, Excoffier L. SPLATCHE: a program to simulate genetic diversity taking into account environmental heterogeneity. Molecular Ecology Notes 2004, 4:139-142.
6. Cushman SA. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation 2006, 128:231-240.
7. Cushman SA, Landguth EL. Spurious correlations and inferences in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04656.x, doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04656.x
8. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwarz MK. Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with casual modeling. The American Naturalist 2006, 168:486-499.
9. Dijkstra EW. A note on two problems in connection with graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1959, 1:269-271.
10. Epperson BK. Spatial and space-time correlations in systems of subpopulations with genetic drift and migration. Genetics 1993, 133:711-727.
11. Epperson BK. Spatial structure of two-locus genotypes under isolation by distance. Genetics 1995, 140:365-375.
12. Epperson BK. Geographical Genetics 2003, Princeton University Press, Princton, NJ
13. Epperson BK. Plant dispersal, neighborhood size and isolation by distance. Molecular Ecology 2007, 16:3854-3865.
14. Epps CW, Wehausen JD, Bleich VC, Torres SG, Brashares JS. Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics. Journal of Applied Ecology 2007, 44:714-724.
15. Ezard THP, Travis JMJ. The impact of habitat loss and fragmentation on genetic drift and fixation time. Oikos 2006, 114:367-375.
16. Hedrick PW. Genetics of Populations 2005, 3rd edn, Jones and Bartlett, Boston, MA
17. Hogg JT, Appolonio M. Mating systems and conservation at large scales. Invertebrate Mating Systems 2000, 213-252. eds, World Scientific Press, Singapore
18. Holderegger R, Wagner HH. A brief guide to landscape genetics. Landscape Ecology 2006, 21:793-796.
19. Landguth EL, Cushman SA. CDPOP: a spatially explicit cost distance population genetics program. Molecular Ecology Resources 2010, 10:156-161.
20. Manel S, Schwartz M, Luikart G, Taberlet P. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution 2003, 18:189-197.
21. Manel S, Berthoud F, Bellemain E. A new individual-based spatial approach for identifying genetic discontinuities in natural populations: example application in brown bears. Molecular Ecology 2007, 16:2031-2043.
22. McRae BH, Beier P. Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 2007, 104:19885-19890.
23. Murphy M, Evans J, Cushman S, Storfer A. Representing genetic variation as continuous surfaces: an approach for identifying spatial dependency in landscape genetic studies. Ecography 2008, 31:685-697.
24. Murphy M, Evans J, Stofer A. Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics. Ecology 2010, 91:252-261.
25. Neville HM, Dunham JB, Peacock MM. Landscape attributes and life history variability shape genetic structure of trout population in a stream network. Landscape Ecology 2006, 21:901-916.
26. Pavlacky DC, Goldizen AW, Prentis PJ, Nicholls JA, Lowe AJ. A landscape genetics approach for quantifying the relative influence of historic and contemporary habitat heterogeneity of the genetic connectivity of a rainforest bird. Molecular Ecology 2009, 18:2945-2960.
27. Perez-Espona S, Perez-Barberia FJ, McLeod JE. Landscape features affect gene flow of Scottish highland red deer (Cervus elaphus). Molecular Ecology 2008, 17:981-996.
28. Ray N. PATHMATRIX: a GIS tool to compute effective distances among samples. Molecular Ecology Notes 2005, 5:177-180.
29. Schwartz MK, Copeland JP, Anderson NJ, Squires JR, Inman RM, McKelvey KS, Pilgrim KL, Waits LP, Cushman SA. Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. Ecology 2009, 90:3222-3232.
30. Selkoe KA, Henzler CM, Gaines SD. Seascape genetics and the spatial ecology of marine populations. Fish and Fisheries 2008, 9:363-377.
31. Sokal RR, Jacquez GM, Wooten MC. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of migration and selection. Genetics 1989, 121:845-855.
32. Sokal RR, Oden NL, Thomson BA. Local spatial autocorrelation in biological variables. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 1998, 65:41-62.
33. Storfer A, Murphy M, Evans J. Putting the landscape in landscape genetics. Heredity 2007, 98:128-142.
34. Wright S. Isolation by distance. Genetics 1943, 28:114-138.