Who is watching over you? The role of shared identity in perceptions of surveillancey

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 135-147

  O'Donnell, Aisling T ^a   Jetten, Jolanda ^a,b   Ryan, Michelle K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955691760     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.615     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Selfcategorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
2. Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Social identity and the recognition of creativity in groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 479-497.
3. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
4. Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., Tangirala, S., & Oakley, J. L. (2006). Information privacy in organizations: Empowering creative and extrarole performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 221-232.
5. Armitage, R. (2002). To CCTVor not to CCTV? A review of current research into the effectiveness of CCTV systems in reducing crime. Nacro community safety practice briefing. Retrieved 1 December 2006, from http://www.epic.org/privacy/surveillance/spotlight/0505/nacro02.pdf.
6. Ashforth, B. E., & Johnson, S. A. (2001). Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. In M. A. Hogg, & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 31-48). Hove: Psychology Press.
7. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological-research-conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
8. BBC News. (2002). CCTV: Does it work? Retrieved 7 February 2007, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2071496.stm.
9. BBC News. (2006). How we are being watched. Retrieved 2 September, 2008, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6110866.stm.
10. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N.,& Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
11. D'Urso, S. C. (2005). Electronic monitoring and surveillance in the organization: presenting a three component model for predicting panoptic effects. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the National Communication Association.
12. D'Urso, S. C. (2006). Who's watching us at work? Toward a structural-perceptual model of electronic monitoring and surveillance in organizations. Communication Theory, 16, 281-303.
13. Halloran, M. J. (2007). Indigenous reconciliation in Australia: Do values, identification and collective guilt matter? Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 1-18.
14. Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., O'Brien, A., & Jacobs, E. (2004). Social identity, social influence and reactions to potentially stressful tasks: Support for the self-categorization model of stress. Stress and Health, 20, 3-9.
15. Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (1999). Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 809-818.
16. Haslam, S. A., O'Brien, A., Jetten, J., Vormedal, K., & Penna, S. (2005). Taking the strain: Social identity, social support, and the experience of stress. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 355-370.
17. Haslam, S. A., Powell, C., & Turner, J. C. (2000). Social identity, self-categorization, and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organisational outcomes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 319-339.
18. Honess, T., & Charman, E. (1992). Closed circuit television in public places: Its acceptability and perceived effectiveness. Police Research Group Crime Prevention Unit Series. Retrieved 26 September 2006, from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/prgpdfs/fcpu35.pdf.
19. Hornsey,M. J., Oppes, T., & Svensson, A. (2002). 'It's OK if we say it, but you can't': Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293-307.
20. Jetten, J., Duck, J., Terry, D. J., & O'Brien, A. (2002). Being attuned to intergroup differences in mergers: The role of aligned leaders for low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1194-1201.
21. Lee, S. Y., & Brand, J. L. (2005). Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 323-333.
22. Levine, M. (2000). SIDE and Closed Circuit Television (CCTV): Exploring surveillance in a public space. In T. Postmes, R. Spears, M. Lea, S. Reicher (Eds.), Side issues centre-stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
23. McGarty, C., Haslam, S. A., Hutchinson, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (1994). The effects of salient group memberships on persuasion. Small Group Research, 25, 267-293.
24. McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., David, B., & Wetherell, M. (1992). Group polarization as conformity to the prototypical group member. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 1-19.
25. Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When mediation is moderated and moderation is mediated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
26. Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
27. Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. Reicher, & M. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 117-141). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
28. Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (1991). Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 125-144.
29. Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen eighty-four. London: Secker & Warburg.
30. Platow, M. J., Haslam, S. A., Both, A., Chew, I., Cuddon, M., & Goharpey, N., et al. (2005). 'It's not funny if they're laughing': Selfcategorization, social influence, and responses to canned laughter. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 542-550.
31. Privacy International. (2007). Leading surveillance societies in the EU and the World 2007. Retrieved 16 January 2008, from http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-559 597.
32. Short, E., & Ditton, J. (1998). Seen and now heard: Talking to the targets of open street CCTV. British Journal of Criminology, 38, 404-428.
33. Surveillance Studies Network. (2006). A Report on the Surveillance Society. Retrieved 2 September 2008, from http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/surveillance_society_full_report_2006.pdf.
34. Tajfel H. (Ed.), (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.
35. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.
36. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S.Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
37. Tanis, M.,& Postmes, T. (2005). A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 413-424.
38. Turner, J. C. (1987). The analysis of social influence. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. Reicher, & M. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 68-88). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
39. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
40. Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1-22.
41. Turner, J. C. Hogg, M. A. Oakes, P. J. Reicher, S. & Wetherell M. (Eds.), (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
42. Turner, J. C.,Wetherell, M. S.,& Hogg, M. A. (1989). Referent informational influence and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 135-147.
43. Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2003). Effects of closed-circuit television on crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 110-135.
44. Whitty,M. T., & Carr, A. N. (2006). New rules in the workplace: Applying object-relations theory to explain problem internet and email behaviour in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 235-250.