Determining early mathematical risk: Ideas for extending the research

School Psychology Review

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 196-202

  Van Der Heyden, Amanda M ^a,b  

^a Education Research and Consulting Inc   (United States)

^b Dept of Researcher Living ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955666571     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Clements, D. H. (1999, March). Subitizing. What is it? Why teach it? Teaching Children Mathematics, pp. 400-405.
2. Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 394-409.
3. Gersten, R., & Chard, D. (1999). Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 33, 18-28.
4. Ginsburg, H. P., Lee, J. S., & Boyd, J. S. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report: Giving Child and Youth Development Knowledge Away, XXII, 3-22.
5. Hintze, J. M., Ryan, A. L., & Stoner, G. (2003). Concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills and the comprehensive test of phonological processing. School Psychology Review, 32, 541-556.
6. Hojnoski, R., Silberglitt, B., & Floyd, R. (2009). Sensitivity to growth over time of the preschool numeracy indicators with a sample of preschoolers in head start. School Psychology Review, 38, 402-418.
7. Jenkins, J. R., Hudson, R. F., & Johnson, E. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36, 582-600.
8. Jordan, N. C., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (1992). Differential calculation abilities in young children from middle- and low-income families. Developmental Psychology, 28, 644-653.
9. Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., Ramineni, C., & Watkins, M. W. (2010). Validating a number sense screening tool for use in kindergarten and first grade: Prediction of mathematics proficiency in third grade. School Psychology Review, 39, 181-195.
10. Klibanoff, R. S., Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Hedges, L. V. (2006). Preschool children's mathematical knowledge: The effect of teacher "math talk." Developmental Psychology, 42, 59-69.
11. Lago, R. M., & DiPerna, J. C. (2010). Number sense in kindergarten: A factor-analytic study of the construct. School Psychology Review, 39, 164-180.
12. Leeflang, M. M. G., Moons, K. G. M., Reitsma, J. B., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2008). Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: Mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions. Clinical Chemistry, 54, 729-737.
13. Macmann, G., & Barnett, D. (1999). Diagnostic decision making in school psychology: Understanding and coping with uncertainty. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), Handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 519-548). New York: Wiley.
14. National Council for Teachers of Mathematics. (2008). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through Grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: Author.
15. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
16. Obuchowski, N. A. (2005). ROC analysis. American Journal of Roentgenology, 184, 364-372.
17. Obuchowski, N. A., Lieber, M. L., & Wians, F. H. (2004). ROC curves in clinical chemistry: Uses, misuses, and possible solutions. Clinical Chemistry, 50, 1118-1125.
18. O'Connor, R. E., Fulmer, D., Harty, K., & Bell, K. (2005). Layers of reading intervention in kindergarten through third grade: Changes in teaching and child outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 440-455.
19. Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 427-515.
20. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families/Head Start Bureau. (2001). The Head Start path to positive child outcomes. Washington, DC: Author.