The role of the user and the society in new product development

Strojniski Vestnik/Journal of Mechanical Engineering

Volumn 56, Issue 7-8, 2010, Pages 521-530

  Fain, Nusa ^a   Moes, Niels ^b   Duhovnik, Jože ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

European Global Product Realization course; Fourfold helix; Market pull; Society; Technology push; Triple helix; User

Indexed keywords

FOURFOLD HELIX; GLOBAL PRODUCTS; MARKET PULL; SOCIETY; TECHNOLOGY PUSH; TRIPLE HELIXES; USER;

INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; VIRTUAL CORPORATION;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 77955631832     PISSN: 00392480     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Žargi U., Kušar J., Berlec T. and Starbek M. A Company's readyness for concurrent product and process development. Strojniški vestnik-journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, Vol.55, No.7-8, p. 427-437.
2. Kušar J., Duhovnik J., Tomaževič R. and Starbek M. Finding and Evaluating Customers' Needs in the Product- Development Process. Strojniški vestnikjournal of Mechanical Engineering, 2007, Vol.53, No.2, p. 78-104.
3. Yapp, C. (2000). The Knowledge Society: the challenge of transition. Business Information Review, vol.17, no.2, p. 59-65.
4. Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, vol.25, p. 195-203
5. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: A Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Minerva, , vol.36, no.3, p. 203-208.
6. Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The transformation of university - industry - government relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology. Retrieved on 22.11.2007, from: http://www.sociology.org/content/vol005.00 4/th.html
7. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2001). Universities and the global knowledge economy: A Triple Helix of University - industry - government relations. Continuum, London,. ISBN 0-8264-5673-1.
8. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The Triple Helix of university - industry - government relations. Social Science Information, vol.42, no.3, p. 293- 337.
9. Marques, J. P. C., Caraca, J. M. G, Diz, H. (2006). How can university - industry - government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal? - The case of the University of Coimbra. Technovation, vol.26, no.4, p. 534-542.
10. Etzkowitz, H. (2002). The triple helix of university - industry - government implications for policy and evaluation. working paper, Retrieved on 5.11.2007, from: http://www.sister.nu/pdf/ wp-11.pdf
11. Koschatzky, K., Bross, U., Stanovnik, P. (2001). Development and innovation potential in the Slovene manufacturing industry. Technovation, vol.21, no.5, p. 311-324.
12. Mok, K. H. (2005). Fostering entrepreneurship: Changing role of government and education governance in Hong Kong. Research Policy, vol.34, no.4, p. 537-554.
13. Bunders, J. F. G., Broerse, J. E. W., Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (1999). The triple helix enriched with the user perspective: A view from Bangladesh. Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.24, p. 235-246.
14. Duggan, R. (1996). Promoting innovation in industry, government and higher education. Long range planning, vol.29, no.4, p. 503- 513.
15. Rogers, E. M. (2002). Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addictive behaviors, vol.27, no.6, p. 989-993.
16. Rogers, E. M., Shoemaker, F. F. (1972). Communication of innovation: a crosscultural approach. 2nd ed. Free Press, New York.
17. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. Free Press, New York.
18. Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J. H., von Hippel, E. (2000). Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science, vol.46, no.12, p. 1513-1527.
19. von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
20. Ornetzeder, M., Rohracher, H. (2006). Userled innovations and participation processes: lessons from sustainable energy technologies. Energy Policy, vol.34, no.2, p. 138-150.
21. Truffer, B. (2003). User-led innovation processes: the development of professional car sharing by environmentally concerned citizens. Innovation, vol.16, no.2, p. 139- 154.
22. Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, vol.84, no.12, p. 78-92.
23. Bromley, D. B. (2000). Comparing corporate reputations: leogne tables, quotients, benchmarks or case studies?. Corporate Reputation Review, vol.5, no.1, p. 35-50.
24. Yin, K. I. (2003). Case study research: design and methods, 3rd ed. Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks.
25. Bromley, D. B. (1986). The case study method in psychology and related disciplines, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
26. Kline, M., Berginc, D. (2004). Transfer of image of a turistical brand of state to its other brands. Theory and practice, vol.41, no.5-6, p. 962-978 (in Slovenian).
27. Horvath, I. (2006). Design competence development in an academic virtual enterprise. Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2006, September 10-13, Philadelphia.
28. Bufardi, A., Xirouchakis, P., Duhovnik, J., Horvath, I. (2005). Collaborative design aspects in the European global product realization. International Journal of Engineering Education, vol.21, no.5, p. 950-963.
29. Žavbi, R., Tavčar, J. (2005). Preparing undergraduate students for work in virtual product development teams. Computers & Education, vol.44, no.4, p. 357-376.