Multidimensional scaling analysis of haptic exploratory procedures

ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Cooke, Theresa ^a   Wallraven, Christian ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Exploratory procedure; Haptic; Multidimensional scaling; Shape; Similarity; Texture

Indexed keywords

EXPLORATORY PROCEDURE; HAPTIC; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL SCALING; SHAPE; SIMILARITY;

EXPERIMENTS; TEXTURES;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 77955608548     PISSN: 15443558     EISSN: 15443965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1658349.1658356     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BARSALOU, L. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 577-660.
2. BERGMANN, T., WOUTER, M., AND KAPPERS, A. 2006. Analysis of haptic perception of materials by multidimensional scaling and physical measurements of roughness and compressibility. Acta. Psychol. (Amst) 121, 1, 1-20.
3. BIEDERMAN, I. 1987. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol. Rev. 94, 2, 115-147.
4. BORG, I. AND GROENEN, P. 2005. Modern Multidimensional Scaling, 2nd Ed. Springer, Berlin.
5. BÜLTHOFF, H. AND EDELMAN, S. 1992. Psychophysical support for a 2-d view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Science 89, 60-64.
6. CARROLL, J. AND CHANG, J. 1970. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of "Eckart-Young" decomposition. Psychometrika 35, 283-319.
7. COOKE, T., JKEL, F.,WALLRAVEN, C., AND BLTHOFF, H. 2007. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects. Neuropsychologia 45, 3, 484-495.
8. COX, T. AND COX, M. 2001. Multidimensional Scaling, 2nd Ed. Chapman & Hall, Oxford, UK.
9. DOSTMOHAMED, H. AND HAYWARD, V. 2005. Trajectory of contact region on the fingerpad gives the illusion of haptic shape. Exp. Brain Res. 164, 3, 387-394.
10. EDELMAN, S. 1999. Representation and Recognition in Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. ERNST, M. AND BÜLTHOFF, H. 2004. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends. Cogn. Sci. 8, 4, 162-169.
12. GARBIN, C. AND BERNSTEIN, I. 1984. Visual and haptic perception of three-dimensional solid forms. Percept. Psychophys. 36, 2, 104-110.
13. GIBSON, J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
14. GOLDSTONE, R. AND SON, J. 2005. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 13-36.
15. HOLLINS, M., FALDOWSKI, R., RAO, S., AND YOUNG, F. 1993. Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 54, 6, 687-705.
16. JANSSON, G. AND MONACI, L. 2004. Touch, Blindness and Neuroscience. UNED Press, Madrid, 209-219.
17. KATZ, D. 1925/1989. The World of Touch. LEA, Hillsdale, NJ.
18. KLATZKY, R. AND LEDERMAN, S. 2003. Experimental psychology. In Handbook of Psychology, vol.4. Healy, A. F., Proctor, R. W., and Weiner, I. B. Eds., Wiley, New York, 147-176.
19. KLATZKY, R., LEDERMAN, S., AND REED, C. 1987. There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. Exp. Psych. 116, 4, 356-369.
20. LAKATOS, S. ANDMARKS, L. 1999. Haptic form perception: relative salience of local and global features. Percept. Psychophys. 61, 5, 895-908.
21. LEDERMAN, S. AND KLATZKY, R. 1987. Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cognit. Psychol. 19, 3, 342-368.
22. LEDERMAN, S. AND KLATZKY, R. 1993. Extracting object properties through haptic exploration. Acta. Psychol. 84, 29-40.
23. LEDERMAN, S., SUMMERS, C., AND KLATZKY, R. 1996. Cognitive salience of haptic object properties: role of modality-encoding bias. Perception 25, 8, 983-998.
24. LESKOVSKY, P., COOKE, T., ERNST, M., AND HARDERS, M. 2006. Using multidimensional scaling to quantify the fidelity of haptic rendering of deformable objects. In Proceedings of EUROHAPTICS. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
25. NEWELL, F., ERNST, M., TJAN, B., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. 2001. Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychol. Sci. 12, 1, 37-42.
26. NÖE, A. 2006. Action in Perception. MIT Press, Boston.
27. NOSOFSKY, R. 1992. Similarity scaling and cognitive process models. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 43, 25-53.
28. O'REGAN, J. AND NOE, A. 2001. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 5, 939-973.
29. PONT, S., KAPPERS, A., AND KOENDERINK, J. 1999. Similar mechanisms underlie curvature comparison by static and dynamic touch. Percept. Psychophys. 61, 5, 874-894.
30. RILEY, M., WAGMAN, J., SANTANA, M., CARELLO, C., AND TURVEY, M. 2002. Perceptual behaviour: recurrence analysis of an exploratory procedure. Perception 31, 481-510.
31. ROLAND, P., O'SULLIVAN, B., AND KAWASHIMA, R. 1998. Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 3295-3300.
32. ROSCH, E. AND MERVIS, C. 1975. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structures of categories. Cognit. Psychol. 7, 573-605.
33. SHEPARD, R. AND CERMAK, G. 1973. Perceptual-cognitive explorations of a toroidal set of free-form stimuli. Cognit. Psychol. 4, 351-377.
34. SIMONS, D. 1996. In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychol. Sci. 7, 5, 301-305.
35. SRINIVASAN, M. AND LAMOTTE, R. 1991. Encoding of Shape in the Responses of Cutaneous Mechanoreceptors. Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series. MacMillan Press, Chapter 5, 59-61.
36. WIPPICH, W., MECKLENBRAUKER, S., AND NORBERT-WURM, J. 1994. Motor and sensory effects of haptic experiences in implicit and explicit memory tests. Z. Exp. Angew. Psychol. 41, 3, 500-522.
37. YOUNG, F. AND HARRIS, D. 2003. ALSCAL. In SPSS 12.0 Command Syntax Reference. SPSS, Chicago, IL, 100-116.