Comparing utilitarian and hedonic usefulness to user intention in multipurpose information systems

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 287-297

  Gu, Ja Chul ^a   Fan, Liu ^b   Suh, Yung Ho ^b   Lee, Sang Chul ^c  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^c Korea Christian University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BEHAVIOR; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PLEASURE; PRODUCTIVITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REFERENCE VALUE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CHILD; COMMUNICATION; EFFICIENCY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTENTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTIVATION; PLEASURE; REFERENCE VALUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955597997     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0167     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Heijden H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 2004; 28:695-704.
2. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989; 13:319-340
3. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1992; 22:1111-1132
4. Dishaw MT, Strong DM. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management 1999; 36:9-21.
5. Yi C, Jiang ZH. The antecedents of online consumers perceived usefulness of Web sites: a protocol analysis approach. Human-Computer Interaction 2007; 4553:142-147
6. Hsu CL, Lu HP. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management 2004; 41:853-868
7. Ha I, Yoon Y, Choi M. Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management 2007; 44:276-286
8. Hirschman EC, Holbrook MB. Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods, and propositions. Journal of Marketing 1982; 46:92-101.
9. Holbrook MB, Hirschman EC. The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research 1982; 9:132-140
10. Crowley EA, Spangenberg ER, Hughes KR. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitudes toward product categories. Marketing Letters 1992; 3:239-249
11. Okada EM. Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research XLII 2005; 42:43-53.
12. Batra R, Ahtola OT. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters 1990; 2: 159-170
13. Mano H, Oliver RL. Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research 1993; 20:451-466
14. Grinter R, Paylen L. (2002) IM everywhere: instant messaging in teen life." Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press.
15. Lenhart AN, Rainie L, Lewis O. (2001) Teenage life online: the rise of the instant-message generation and the Internet's impact on friendships and family relationships. Pew Internet & American Life Project. www.pewinternet.org.
16. Huang AH, Yen DC. Usefulness of instant messaging among young users: social vs work perspective. Human Systems Management 2003; 22:63.
17. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information System Research 2000; 11:342-365
18. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000; 46:186-204.
19. Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW. Trust and TAM in online shopping: an interacted model. MIS Quarterly 2003; 27:51-90.
20. Agarwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 2000; 24:665-694
21. Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 1995; 6:144-176
22. Hu P, Chau P, Sheng O, et al. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 1999; 16:91-112.
23. Saadé R, Bahli B. The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 2005; 42:317-327
24. Shang RA, Chen YC, Shen L. Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line. Information & Management 2005; 42:401-413
25. Wu JH, Wang SC. What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management 2005; 42:719-729
26. Yu J, Ha I, Choi M, et al. Extending the TAM for a t-commerce. Information & Management 2005; 42:965-976
27. Nysveen H, Pedersen PE, Thorbjrnsen H. Intentions to use mobile services: antecedents and cross-service comparisons. Academy of Marketing Science 2005; 33:330-346
28. Bruner II GC, Kumar A. Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. Journal of Business Research 2005; 58:553-558
29. Lai VS, Li HL. Technology acceptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis. Information & Management 2005; 42:373-386
30. Lee HY, Lee YK, Kwon DW. The intention to use computerized reservation systems: the moderating effects of organizational support and supplier incentive. Journal of Business Research 2005; 58:1552-1561
31. Lin CS, Wu S, Tsai RJ. Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for Web portal context. Information & Management 2005; 42:683-693
32. Babin BJ, Darden WR, Griffin M. Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research 1994; 20:644-656
33. Hartman JB. Hierarchical influence of personal values and innovativeness on adolescent Web-consumption. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, 20 DAI-A, 65 (09), 3588 (Publication No. ATT 3145070).
34. Hartman JB, Samra YM. Impact of personal values and innovativeness on hedonic and utilitarian aspects of Web use: an empirical study among United States teenagers. International Journal of Management 2008; 25:77-94.
35. Teo TSH, Lim VKG, Lai RYC. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. OMEGA-International Journal of Management Science 1999; 27:25-37.
36. Moon J, Kim Y. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management 2001; 38:217-230
37. MacInnis DJ, Jaworski BJ. Information processing from advertisements: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Marketing 1989; 53:1-23.
38. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003; 27:425-478
39. Castaneda JA, Munoz-Leiva F, Luque T. Web Acceptance Model (WAM): moderating effects of user experience. Information & Management 2007; 44:384-396
40. Im I, Kim YB, Han HJ. The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users acceptance of technologies. Information & Management 2008; 45:1-9.
41. Venkatesh V, Morris MG. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology. MIS Quarterly 2000; 24:115-139
42. Gerbing DW, Anderson JC. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research 1988; 25:186-192
43. Bagozzi RP. ACR fellow speech. Advances in Consumer Research 1994; 21:8-11.
44. Baumgartner H, Homburg C. Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review. International Journal of Research in Marketing 1996; 13:139-161
45. Hair Jr. J, Anderson J, Norman J, et al. (1995) Multivariate data analysis with readings. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
46. Steenkamp J-BEM, van Trijp HCM. The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs, International Journal of Research in Marketing 1991; 8:283-299
47. Bollen KA. (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
48. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1998; 16:74-94.
49. Sujan H, Weitz BA, Kumar N. Learning, orientation, working smart, and effective selling. Journal ofMarketing 1994; 58:39-52.
50. Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research 2003; 14:189-217.
51. Craig CS, Douglas SP. (1999) International marketing research. New York: Wiley.
52. Mullen MR. Diagnosing measurement equivalence in crossnational research. Journal of International Business Studies 1995; 26:573-596
53. Myers MB, Calantone RJ, Page Jr TJ, et al. Academic insights: an application of multiple-group causal models in assessing cross-cultural measurement equivalence. Journal of International Marketing 2000; 8:108-121
54. Jöreskog KG, Sörborm D. (1989) LISREL VII User's Reference Guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
55. Calantone RJ, Zhao YS. Joint ventures in China: a comparative study of Japanese, Korean, and U.S. partners. Journal of International Marketing 2000; 9:1-23.
56. Cohen J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989; 35:982-1003.
58. Deng X, Doll WJ, Hendrickson AR, Scazzero JA. A multigroup analysis of structural invariance: an illustration using the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 2005; 42:745-759
59. Tang JC, de Bonte A, Raven MB, et al. (2000) Instant messaging: products meet workplace users. In Proceedings of the ACM 2000 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press.