Shaping cooperation behavior: The role of accessibility experiences and uncertainty

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 178-187

  Müller, Patrick A ^a   Greifeneder, Rainer ^b   Stahlberg, Dagmar ^b   van den Bos, Kees ^a   Bless, Herbert ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955586040     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.632     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (1999). How often did I do it? Experienced ease of retrieval and frequency estimates of past behavior. Acta Psychological, 103, 77-89.
2. Baden, J. A. (1998). A new primer for the management of common resources and public goods. In J. A. Baden, & D. S. Noonan (Eds.), Managing the common (2nd ed. pp. 51-62). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3. Chen, C., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford Press.
4. Dawes, R. M. (1988). Rational choice in an uncertain world. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
5. De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural fairness, sense of self and cooperation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 151-218). New York: Elsevier.
6. De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2007). The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 639-649.
7. De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (2002). Intra and intergroup dynamics of leadership in social dilemmas: A relational model of cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 126-136.
8. Dijksterhuis, A., Macrae, C. N., & Haddock, G. (1999). When recollective experiences matter: Subjective ease of retrieval and stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 760-768.
9. Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425, 785-791.
10. Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G., & Riedl, A. (1993). Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 437-459.
11. Florack, A., & Zoabi, H. (2003). Risk behavior in share transactions: When investors think about reasons. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 34, 65-78.
12. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
13. Grayson, C. E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Beliefs influence information processing strategies: Declarative and experiential information in risk assessment. Social Cognition, 17, 1-18.
14. Greifeneder, R. (2007). Reliance on accessibility experiences in judgment and decision making. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
15. Greifeneder, R., & Bless, H. (2007). Relying on accessible content versus accessibility experiences: The case of processing capacity. Social Cognition, 25, 853-881.
16. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
17. Haddock, G. (2000). Subjective ease of retrieval and attitude-relevant judgments. In H. Bless, & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 125-142). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
18. Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2005). When negative expectancies turn into negative performance: The role of ease of retrieval. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 535-541.
19. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
20. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
21. Lind, E. A., & Van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory uncertainty management. In B. M. Staw, & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 181-223). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
22. Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A.,&Rodger, B. (1999). A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 405-416.
23. Müller, P. A., Greifeneder, R., Stahlberg, D., Van den Bos, K., & Bless, H. (2008). Beyond procedure's content: Cognitive subjective experiences in procedural justice judgments. Manuscript submitted for publication.
24. Petty, R. E.,&Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer.
25. Raghubir, P., & Menon, G. (1998). AIDS and me, never the twain shall meet: The effects of information accessibility on judgments of risk and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 52-63.
26. Posner, E. A. (2000). Law and social norms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Rothman, A. J., & Hardin, C. D. (1997). Differential use of the availability heuristic in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 123-138.
28. Rothman, A. J., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1053-1064.
29. Ruder, M.,&Bless, H. (2003). Mood and the reliance on the ease of retrieval heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 20-32.
30. Schroeder, D. A., Steel, J. E., Woodell, A. J., & Bembenek, A. F. (2003). Justice within social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 374-387.
31. Schwarz, N. (1998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 87-99.
32. Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332-348.
33. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
34. Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973-988.
35. Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E.,& Briñol, P. (2002). Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1700-1712.
36. Trivers, R. L. (1971). Evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.
37. Tversky, A.,&Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
38. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2003). Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361.
39. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
40. Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 931-941.
41. Van den Bos, K. (2003). On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 482-498.
42. Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, (pp. 1-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43. Van den Bos, K., Poortvliet, P. M., Maas, M., Miedema, J., & Van den Ham, E.-J. (2005). An enquiry concerning the principles of cultural norms and values: The impact of uncertainty and mortality salience on reactions to violations and bolstering of cultural worldviews. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 91-113.
44. Wänke, M., & Bless, H. (2000). The effects of subjective ease of retrieval on attitudinal judgments: The moderating role of processing motivation. In H. Bless, & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 143-161). Philadelphia, PA, US: Psychology Press.
45. Wänke, M., Bless, H.,&Biller, B. (1996). Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1105-1113.
46. Wänke, M., Bohner, G.,&Jurkowitsch, A. (1997). There are many reasons to drive aBMW: Does imagined ease of argument generation influence attitudes? Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 170-177.
47. Wänke, M., Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1995). The availability heuristic revisited: Experienced ease of retrieval in mundane frequency estimates. Acta Psychologica, 89, 83-90.
48. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
49. Weary, G., Jacobson, J. A., Edwards, J. A., & Tobin, S. J. (2001). Chronic and temporarily activated causal uncertainty beliefs and stereotype usage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 206-219.