Teaching leadership as exploring sacred space

Educational Action Research

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 447-461

  Getz, Cheryl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Action inquiry; Action research; Case in point pedagogy; Group relations; Teaching leadership; Undergraduate teaching and learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955564712     PISSN: 09650792     EISSN: 17475074     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09650790903093318     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams, N. 1997. A letter to a young director. In Proceedings from the Twelfth Scientific Meeting of AKRI, 241-52. London: AK Rice Institute.
2. Argyris, C., and D. Schon. 1974. Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Bertram-Gallant, T. and Getz, C. 2009. Facing organizational complexity and change: Rethinking leadership development. In New horizons for leadership development of faculty and administrators in higher education, ed. A. Kezar and R. Carducci, 93-115. Sterling, UA: Stylus.
4. Boyd, R.D., and J.G. Myers. 1988. Transformative education. International Journal of Lifelong Education 7, no. 4: 261-84.
5. Carli, L.L. 1990. Gender, language and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 941-51.
6. Carli, L.L., S.J. LaFleur, and C.C. Loeber. 1995. Nonverbal behavior, gender and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68: 1030-41.
7. Chandler, D., and B. Torbert. 2003. Transforming inquiry and action: Interviewing 27 flavors of action research. Action Research 1, no. 2: 133-52.
8. Cranton, P. 1994. Understanding and promoting transformative learning: a guide for educators of adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Daloz-Parks, S. 2000. Big questions, worthy dreams: Mentoring young adults in their search for meaning, purpose, and faith. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Daloz-Parks, S. 2005. Leadership can be taught. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
11. Doh, J. 2003. Can leadership be taught? Perspectives from management educators. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2, no. 1: 54-67.
12. Eagly, A., and L. Carli. 2004. Women and men as leaders. In The Nature of Leadership, ed. J. Antonakis, A. Cianciolo, and R. Sternberg, 279-301. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Ford, K. 1997. The importance of intra-personal abilities for competency in group relations work. In Proceedings from the Twelfth Scientific Meeting of AKRI, 253-62. London: AK Rice Institute.
14. Getz, C., and S. Gelb. 2007. An integral approach to the teaching of leadership studies at the University of San Diego School of Leadership and Education Sciences. Integral Leadership Review 7, no. 1. http://integralleadershipreview.com/archives/2007_01/2007_01_getz_gelb.html.
15. Glisczinski, D. 2007. Transformative higher education: A meaningful degree of understanding. Journal of Transformative Education 5, no. 4: 317-28.
16. Halley, A. 2002. Teaching leadership as engaged 21st century social science: a portfolio of transition learning ecologies. International Journal of Public Administration 25, no. 9 & 10: 1035-77.
17. Heifetz, R.A. 1994. Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
18. Heifetz, R.A., and M. Linsky. 2002. Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
19. Lambert, L., D. Walker, D. Zimmerman, J. Cooper, M. Lambert, M. Gardner, and F. Slack. 1995. The constructivist leader. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Lewin, K. 1997. Resolving social conflicts: Field theory in social science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Marshall, J. 2001. Self-reflective inquiry practices. In Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice, ed. P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 433-9. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Mezirow, J. 1991. Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Mezirow, J., and associates. 2000. Learning as transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Richards-Wilson, S. 2004. Introverts as silent leaders: Indefensible or indomitable. Organisational and Social Dynamics 4, no. 2: 234-46.
25. Roberts, D. 2007. Deeper learning in leadership: Helping college students find the potential within. San Francisco: Wiley.
26. Scharmer, C.O. 2003. The Blind Spot of leadership: Presencing as a social technology of freedom. http://www.dialogonleadership.org/TheBlindSpot2003.pdf.
27. Senge, P., C.O., Jaworski, J. Scharmer, and B.S. Flowers. 2004. Presence: Human purpose and the field of the future. Cambridge, MA: SOL.
28. Simpson, P., R. French, and C. Harvey. 2002. Leadership and negative capability. Human Resources 55, no. 10: 1209-26.
29. Smith, K. 1995. On using the self as instrument: Lessons from a facilitator's experience. In Groups in context, ed. J. Gillette and M. McCollom, 277-94. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30. Torbert, B. 2000. A developmental approach to social science: Integrating first-, second-, and third-person research/practice through single-, double-, and triple-loop feedback. Journal of Adult Development 7, no. 4: 255-67.
31. Torbert, B., et al. 2004. Action Inquiry: The secret of timely and transforming leadership. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
32. UCLA. n.d. Spirituality in higher education. http://www.spirituality.ucla.edu/about/index.html.
33. Wells, L. 1990. The group as a whole: A systematic socioanalytic perspective on group relations. In Groups in context, ed. J. Gillette and M. McCollom, 49-85. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
34. Wilber, K. 2000. A Theory of Everything: An integral vision for business, politics, science and spirituality. Boston: Shambhala.
35. Zajonc, A. 2003. Spirituality on higher education: Overcoming the divide. Liberal Education Winter: 50-8.