Effects of attention on a relative mislocalization with successively presented stimuli

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 18, 2010, Pages 1793-1802

  Bocianski, Diana ^a   Müsseler, Jochen ^a   Erlhagen, Wolfram ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Distributed attention; Dynamic field model; Focused attention; Localization error; Relative judgment; Space perception; Spatial cueing; Visual illusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CELL POPULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; NERVE CONDUCTION; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PERIPHERAL VISION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA FOVEA; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955554455     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.036     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aschersleben G., Müsseler J. On the perceived interdependence of space and time: Evidence for spatial priming in the temporal kappa effect. Space and time in perception and action 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. R. Nijhawan, B. Khurana (Eds.).
2. Awh E., Pashler H. Evidence for split attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2000, 26:834-846.
3. Badcock D.R., Westheimer G. Spatial location and hyperacuity: The centre/surround localization contribution function has two substrates. Vision Research 1985, 25:1259-1267.
4. Bocianski D., Müsseler J., Erlhagen W. Relative mislocalization of successively presented stimuli. Vision Research 2008, 48:2204-2212.
5. Brainard D.H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
6. Cohen A., Ivry R. Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1989, 15:650-663.
7. Cohen A., Ivry R. Density effects in conjunction search: Evidence for a coarse location mechanisms of feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1991, 17:891-901.
8. Downing C. Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1988, 14:188-202.
9. Driver J., Frith C.D. Shifting baselines in attention research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2000, 1:147-148.
10. Egly R., Homa D. Sensitization of the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:778-793.
11. Eriksen C.W., Yeh Y. Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11:583-597.
12. Erlhagen W. Internal models for visual perception. Biological Cybernetics 2003, 88:409-417.
13. Erlhagen W., Jancke D. The role of action plans and other cognitive factors in motion extrapolation: A modelling study. Visual Cognition 2004, 11:315-340.
14. Fitzpatrick D. Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2000, 10:438-443.
15. Franconeri S.L., Alvarez G.A., Enns J.T. How many locations can you select?. Journal of Experimental Society: Human Perception & Performance 2007, 33:1003-1012.
16. Jancke D., Erlhagen W. Bridging the gap: A model of common neural mechanisms underlying the Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag effect, and the representational momentum effect. Space and time in perception and action 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. R. Nijhawan, B. Khurana (Eds.).
17. Jancke D., Erlhagen W., Dinse H., Akhavan A., Giese M., Steinhage A., et al. Parametric population representation of retinal location: Neuronal interaction dynamics in cat primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 19:9016-9028.
18. Jancke D., Erlhagen W., Schöner G., Dinse H. Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 2004, 556.3:971-982.
19. Kirschfeld K., Kammer T. The Fröhlich effect: A consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Research 1999, 39:3702-3709.
20. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:138-147.
21. Kramer A.E., Hahn S. Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field. Psychological Science 1995, 6:381-386.
22. Mateef S., Gourevich A. Peripheral vision and perceived visual directions. Biological Cybernetics 1983, 49:111-118.
23. Mateef S., Hohnsbein J. Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away. Vision Research 1988, 28:711-719.
24. Mazza V., Turatto M., Rossi M., Umilta C. How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention?. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:514-522.
25. McCormick P.A., Klein R. The spatial distribution of attention during covert visual orienting. Acta Psychologica 1990, 75:225-242.
26. Müsseler J. Position-dependent and position-independent attention shifts: Evidence against the spotlight and premotor assumption of visual focussing. Psychological Research 1994, 56:251-260.
27. Müsseler J., Stork S., Kerzel D. Comparing mislocalizations in movement direction: The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag effect and the representational momentum. Visual Cognition 2002, 9:120-138.
28. Müsseler J., van der Heijden A.H.C. Two spatial maps contributing to perceived space. Evidence from a relative mislocalization. Visual Cognition 2004, 11:235-254.
29. Müsseler J., van der Heijden A.H.C., Mahmud S.H., Deubel H., Ertsey S. Relative mislocalization of briefly presented stimuli in the retinal periphery. Perception & Psychophysics 1999, 61:1646-1661.
30. Newby E.A., Rock I. Location and attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2001, 54A:155-168.
31. O'Regan J.K. Retinal versus extraretinal influences in flash localization during saccadic eye movements in the presence of a visible background. Perception and Psychophysics 1984, 36:1-14.
32. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:437-442.
33. Pilz K.S., Braun C., Altpeter E., MacKeben M., Trauzettel-Klosinski S. Modulation of visual stimulus discrimination by sustained focal attention: An MEG study. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 2006, 47:1225-1229.
34. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:3-25.
35. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance X 1984, 531-556. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Bouma, D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.).
36. Posner M.I., Snyder C.R.R., Davidson B.J. Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1980, 109:160-174.
37. Prinzmetal W., Amiri H., Allen K., Edwards T. Phenomenology of attention: I. Color, location, orientation, and spatial frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1998, 24:261-282.
38. Rizzolatti G., Riggio L., Dascola I., Umiltà C. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 1987, 25:31-40.
39. Rodway P. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities. Acta Psychologica 2005, 120:199-226.
40. Sanders A.F. The foreperiod effect revisited. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1975, 27:591-598.
41. Skavensky A.A. Eye movement and visual localization of objects in space. Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes 1990, 263-287. Elsevier, Amsterdam. E. Kowler (Ed.).
42. Slotnick S.D., Schwarzbach J., Yantis S. Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex. Neuroimage 2003, 19:1602-1611.
43. Smith A.T., Singh K.D., Greenlee M.W. Attentional suppression of activity in the human visual cortex. NeuroReport 2000, 11:271-277.
44. Spence C., Driver J. Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:555-574.
45. Spence C., Driver J. Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Perception & Psychophysics 1997, 59:1-22.
46. Spence C., Nicholls M.E.R., Gillespie N., Driver J. Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision. Perception & Psychophysics 1998, 60:544-557.
47. Steinman B.A., Steinman S.B., Lehmkuhle S. Visual attention mechanisms show a center-surround organization. Vision Research 1995, 35:1859-1869.
48. Stork S., Müsseler J., van der Heijden A.H.C. Perceptual judgement and saccadic behaviour in a spatial distortion with briefly presented stimuli. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2010, 6:1-14.
49. Tsal Y. Effects of attention on length perception, gap detection and visual localization. Towards a theory of attentional receptive fields. Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events. Advances in psychology 1999, Vol. 129:155-166. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
50. Tsal Y., Bareket T. Effects of attention on localization of stimuli in the visual field. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999, 6:292-296.
51. Tsal Y., Bareket T. Localization judgments under various levels of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:559-566.
52. Tsal Y., Lavie N. Location dominance in attending to color and shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:131-139.
53. Tsal Y., Meiran N., Lamy D. Towards a resolution theory of visual attention. Visual Cognition 1995, 2:313-330.
54. Tsal Y., Shalev L. Inattention magnifies perceived length: The attentional receptive field hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception & Performance 1996, 22:233-243.
55. Umiltà C., Riggio L., Dascola I., Rizzolatti G. Differential effects of central and peripheral cues on the reorienting of spatial attention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1991, 3:247-267.
56. van der Heijden A.H.C., Müsseler J., Bridgeman B. On the perception of position. Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events. Advances in psychology 1999, Vol. 129:19-38. Elsevier, North-Holland.
57. van der Heijden A.H.C., Van der Geest J.N., De Leeuw F., Krikke K., Müsseler J. Sources of position-perception error for small isolated targets. Psychological Research 1999, 62:20-35.
58. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63:1293-1313.
59. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63:1314-1329.
60. Yeshurun Y., Carrasco M. Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature 1998, 396:72-75.