Evidence for split attentional foci

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 834-846

  Awh, Edward ^b   Pashler, Harold ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 0034171028     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.834     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bichot, N. P., Cave, K. R., & Pashler, H. (1999). Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 81-89.
2. Castiello, U., & Umilta, C. (1992). Splitting focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 837-848.
3. Cheal, M. L., & Gregory, M. (1997). Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 51-71.
4. Davis, R., & Schmit, V. (1971). Timing the transfer of information between hemispheres in man. Acta Psychologica, 35, 335-346.
5. Downing, C. J., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. II, pp. 171-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Eriksen, C. W., & Collins, J. F. (1969). Visual perceptual rate under two conditions of search. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 489-492.
7. Eriksen, C. W., & Spencer, T. (1969). Rate of information processing in visual perception: Some results and methodological considerations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 1-16.
8. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597.
9. Hahn, S., & Kramer, A. F. (1998). Further evidence for the division of attention between noncontiguous locations. Visual Cognition, 5, 217-256.
10. Heinze, H., Luck, S. J., Muente, T. F., Goes, A., Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 42-52.
11. Henderson, J. M. (1996). Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 780-787.
12. Hughes, H. C., & Zimba, L. D. (1987). Spatial maps of directed visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 409-430.
13. Kinsbourne, M. (1987). Mechanisms of unilateral neglect. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect (pp. 69-86). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
14. Kramer, A. F., & Hahn, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field. Psychological Science, 6, 381-386.
15. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
16. Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., & Hawkins, H. L. (1996). Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Resource allocation or uncertainty reduction? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 725-737.
17. Mangun, G. R., Hillyard, S. A., & Luck, S. J. (1993). Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention. In S. Kornblum & D. E. Meyer (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 14, pp. 219-243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. McCormick, P. A., & Klein, R. (1990). The spatial distribution of attention during covert visual orienting. Acta Psychologica, 75, 225-242.
19. Palmer, J., Ames, C. T., & Lindsey, D. T. (1993). Measuring the effects of attention on simple visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 108-130.
20. Pan, K., & Eriksen, C. W. (1993). Attentional distribution in the visual field during same-different judgments as assessed by response competition. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 134-144.
21. Pashler, H. (1997). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
23. Sereno, A. B., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1991). Discrimination within and between hemifields: A new constraint on theories of attention. Neuropsychologia, 29, 659-675.
24. Shiu, L., & Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precueing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1037-1054.
25. Sperling, G., & Dosher, B. A. (1986). Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and performance (Vol. 1, pp. 2.1-2.65). New York: Wiley.
26. Sperling, G., & Reeves, A. (1980). Measuring the reaction time of an unobservable response: A shift of visual attention. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 347-360). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.