Development of a system that generates structured reports for chest X-ray radiography

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 360-370

  Hasegawa, Y ^a   Matsumura, Y ^a   Mihara, N ^a   Kawakami, Y ^b   Sasai, K ^b   Takeda, H ^a   Nakamura, H ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Konica Minolta Technology Center Inc   (Japan)

Author keywords

Chest x ray photography; Information model; Radiology report; Resource description framework; Structured report

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ALGORITHM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JAPAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; METHODOLOGY; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; JAPAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77955536653     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3414/ME09-01-0014     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Tierney WM, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ. Toward electronic medical records that improve care. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 725-726.
2. Langlotz CP. Automatic structuring of radiology reports: harbinger of a second information revo - lution in radiology. Radiology 2002; 224: 5-7.
3. Cheung NT, Fung V, Chow YY, Tung Y. Structured data entry of clinical information for documentation and data collection. Medinfo 2001; 10: 609-613.
4. Langlotz CP, Meininger L. Enhancing the expres - siveness and usability of structured image reporting systems. Proc AMIA Symp 2000. pp 467-471.
5. Williamson KB, Steele JL, Gunderman RB. Assessing radiology resident reporting skills. Radiology 2002; 225: 719-722.
6. Moorman PW, van Ginneken AM, van der Lei J, Van Bemmel JH. A model for structured data entry based on explicit descriptional knowledge. Methods Inf Med 1994; 33 (5): 454-463.
7. Los RK, van Ginneken AM, van der Lei J. OpenSDE: A strategy for expressive and flexible structured data entry. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74: 481-490.
8. Association National Electrical Manufactures: Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) 3.0, supplement 23 DICOM Structured Reporting. Last accessed February 16, 2009. Available at: ftp://medical.nema.org/Dicom/ final/ sup23-ft.pdf.
9. Rada H, Uwe E, Andre S. DICOM Structured Reporting Part 1. Overview and Characteristics. RadioGraphics 2004; 24: 891-896.
10. Graig A, Usha S, Ricky T. Structured Reporting in Neuroradiology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002; 980: 259-266.
11. Luyin Z, Kwok PL, Jingkun H. Generating XML Schemas for DICOM Structured Reporting Templates. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12: 72-83.
12. Rita N. Benefits of the DICOM Structured Report. J Digit Imaging 2006; 19: 295-306.
13. Kamauu AW, Duvall SL, Liimatta AP, Wiggins RH, 3rd, Avrin DE. Translating the IHE Teaching File and Clinical Trial Export (TCE) Profile Document Templates into Functional DICOM Structured Report Objects. J Digit Imaging 2007, Sep 4.
14. RadLex, Radiology Society of North America (RSNA). Available at http://www.radlex.com. Accessed March 2008.
15. Langlotz CP. RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. Radiographics 2006; 26 (6): 1595-1597.
16. Marwede D, Schulz T, Kahn T. Indexing Thoracic CT Reports Using a Preliminary Version of a Standardized Radiological Lexicon (RadLex). J Digit Imaging 2007; 28: 1-8.
17. van Ginneken AM. Structured data entry in ORCA: the strengths of two models combined. Proc AMIA Symp 1996. pp 797-801.
18. Johnson SB, Bakken S, Dine D, Hyun S, Mendonça E, Morrison F, Bright T, Van Vleck T, Wrenn J, Stetson P. An electronic health record based on structured narrative. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15: 54-64.
19. O'Connell BT, Cho C, Shah N, Brown KM, Shiffman RN. Take note(s): differential HER satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11: 43-49.
20. Friedman C. A broad-coverage natural language processing system. Proc AMIA Symp 2000. pp 270-274.
21. Taira RK, Soderland SG. A statistical natural language processor for medical reports. Proc AMIA Symp 1999. pp 970-974.
22. Friedman C, Alderson PO, Austin JHLuyin Z, Kwok PL, Jingkun H. A general natural-language text processor for clinical radiology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1 (2): 161-174.
23. Taira RK, Soderland SG, Jakobovits RM, et al. Automatic structuring of radiology free-text reports. RadioGraphics 2001; 21: 237-245.
24. Dang PA, Kalra MK, Blake MA, et al. Use of Radcube for Extraction of Finding Trends in a Large Radiology Practice. J Digit Imaging 2008; 16 (June 10).
25. Nishimoto N, Terae S, Uesugi M, Ogasawara K, Sakurai T. Development of a medical-text parsing algorithm based on character adjacent probabili - ty distribution for Japanese radiology reports. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (6): 513-521.
26. Ceusters W, Spyns P, De Moor G. From syntacticsemantic tagging to knowledge discovery in medical texts. Int J Med Inform 1998; 52 (1-3): 149-157.
27. Nardon FB, Moura LA. Knowledge sharing and information integration in healthcare using ontologies and deductive databases. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107 (Pt 1): 62-66.
28. Baneyx A, Charlet J, Jaulent MC. Methodology to Build Medical Ontology from Textual Resources. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006. pp 21-25.
29. Qamar R, Kola J, Rector AL. Unambiguous data modeling to ensure higher accuracy term binding to clinical terminologies. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007; 11: 608-613.
30. Lassila O, Swick R. World Wide Web consortium: Resource description framework (RDF) model and syntax specification, 1999. Last accessed December 18, 2008. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/PRrdf- syntax.
31. Berners-LT, Hendler J, Lassila O. The semantic web. Scientific American 2001; 5: 34-43.
32. Berners LT. Information management: A proposal (The original proposal of the WWW; March 1989, May 1990). Last accessed February 16, 2009. Available at: http://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.rtf.
33. Prud'hommeaux E, Seaborne A. World Wide Web consortium: SPARQL Query Language for RDF, 2008. Last accessed July 1, 2009. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR./rdf-sparql-query.
34. Boulos MN, Roudsari AV, Carson ER. Towards a semantic medical Web:HealthCyberMap's tool for building an RDF metadata base of health information resources based on the Qualified Dublin Core Metadata Set. Med Sci Monit 2002; 8 (7): MT124-36.
35. Eclipse.org: Eclipse universal tool platform. Last accessed February 16, 2009. Available at: http://www. eclipse.org.
36. Eclipse Foundation, Eclipse Graph Editing Framework: Last accessed February 16, 2009. Available at: http://www.eclipse.org/gef.
37. PostgreSQL, PostgreSQL Global Development Group: Last accessed February 16, 2009. Available at: http://www.postgresql.org.
38. Jena semantic web framework, Sourceforge.net: Last accessed February 16, 2009. Available at: http://jena.sourceforge.net.
39. Hripcsak G, Rothschild AS. Agreement, the f-measure, and reliability in information retrieval. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12 (3): 296-298.
40. Roberts A, Gaizauskas R, Hepple M, et al. The CLEF corpus: semantic annotation of clinical text. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007. pp 625-629.
41. Robert HD, Liora A, Sandy B, Calvin B. HL7 clinical document architecture, release 2.0, 2004. Health Level Seven. Last accessed February 16, 2009. Available at: http://xml.coverpages.org/CDA- 20040830v3.pdf.
42. Gerdsen F, Müller S, Jablonski S, Prokosch HU. Standardized exchange of clinical documents, towards a shared care paradigm in glaucoma treatment. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (4): 359-366.
43. Klein A, Prokosch HU, Müller M, Ganslandt T. Experiences with an interoperable data acquisition platform for multi-centric research networks based on HL7 CDA. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (5): 580-585.