Structured reporting in neuroradiology

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 980, Issue , 2002, Pages 259-266

  Morioka, Craig A ^a,b   Sinha, Usha ^a   Taira, Ricky ^a   El Saden, Suzie ^a   Duckwiler, Gary ^a   Kangarloo, Hooshang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

DICOM; Natural language processing; Neuroradiology; Radiology; Structured report

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE; NEURORADIOLOGY;

EID: 0036975153     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04902.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. BERLIN, L. 2000. Malpractice issues in radiology: pitfalls of the vague radiology report. Am. J. Radiol. 174: 1511-1518.
2. BERLIN, L. 1998. Equal rights for all-except for doctors. Am. J. Radiol. 170: 1395.
3. DIGITAL IMAGING COMMUNICATIONS IN MEDICINE (DICOM). 2000. Supplement 23. Structured Reporting Storage SOP Classes. NEMA Standards Publications, Rosslyn, VA.
4. WHEELER, P.S., D.W. SIMBORG & J.N. GITLIN. 1976. The Johns Hopkins radiology reporting system. Radiology 119: 315-319.
5. LEHR, J.L., G.S. LODWICK & B.F. NICHOLSON. 1973. Experience with MARS (Missouri Automated Radiology System). Radiology 106: 289-294.
6. LEEMING, B.W., M. SIMON, J.D. JACKSON, et al. 1979. Advances in radiologic reporting with computerized language information processing (CLIP). Radiology 133: 349-353.
7. BELL, D.S., E. PATTISON-GORDON & R.A. GREENES. 1994. Experiments in concept modeling for radiolgraphic image reports, J. Am. Med. Informatics Assoc. 3: 249-262.
8. MOORMAN, P.W., A.M. VAN GINNEKEN, P.D. SIERSEMA, et al. 1995. Evaluation of reporting based on descriptional knowledge. J. Am. Med. Informatics Assoc. 2: 365-373.
9. POON, A.D. & L.M. FAGAN. 1996. PEN-ivory: the design and evaluation of a pen-based computer system for structured data entry. J. Am. Med. Informatics Assoc. 3: 168-183.
10. LANGOLTZ, C.P. 2000. Enhancing the expressiveness of structured reporting systems. J. Digit. Imaging 13: 49-53.
11. BIDGOOD, W.D., JR., B. BRAY, N. BROWN, et al. 1999. Image acquisition context: procedure description attributes for clinically relevant indexing and selective retrieval of biomedical images. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 6: 61-75.
12. CLUNIE, D.A. 2000. DICOM Structured Reporting. Pixel Medical Publishing, Bangor.
13. CSIPO, D., R.E. DAYHOFF & P.M. KUZMAK. 2001. Integrating digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM)-structured reporting into the hospital environment. J. Digit. Imaging 14: 12-16.
14. TIRADO-RAMOS, A., J.-K. HU, & K.P. LEE. 2002. Information object definition-based unified modeling language representation of DICOM structured reporting: a case study of transcoding DICOM to XML. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 9: 63-71.
15. SINHA, U., B. DAI, D.B. JOHNSON, et al. 2000. Interactive software for generalization and visualization of structured findings in radiology reports. Am. J. Radiol. 175: 609-612.
16. TAIRA, R.K., S.G. SODERLAND & R.M. JAKOBOVITS. 2001. Automatic structuring of radiology free-text reports. Radiographics 21: 237-245.