Bipolar transurethral resection in saline: The solution to avoid hyponatraemia and transurethral resection syndrome

Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 228-235

  Michielsen, Dirk P J ^a   Coomans, Danny ^b   Braeckman, Johan G ^a   Umbrain, Vincent ^c  

^a University Hospital   (Belgium)

^b VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Hyponatraemia; Prostate; Transurethral resection; TUR syndrome

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HYPONATREMIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; RISK REDUCTION; SURGICAL RISK; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION SYNDROME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; HUMANS; HYPONATREMIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; RISK FACTORS; SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SYNDROME; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER NECK OBSTRUCTION; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 77955526185     PISSN: 00365599     EISSN: 16512065     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00365591003720275     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Madersbacher S, Lackner J, Brössner C, Röhlich M, Stancik I, Willinger M, et al. Reoperation, myocardial infarction and mortality after transurethral and open prostatectomy: a nation-wide, long-term analysis of 23,123 cases. Eur Urol 2005;47:499-504.
2. Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, Sanz CR, Emberton M, de la Rosette JJ. EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol 2004;46:547-554
3. Madersbacher S, Marberger M. Is transurethral resection of the prostate still justified? BJU Int 1999;83:227-237
4. Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett AT, Peters PC. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol 1989;141:243-247
5. Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) - incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol 2006;50: 969-979
6. Miki M, Loritani N. TUR in saline: TURis. Tokyo: Olympus Corporation; 2004.
7. Mamoulakis C, Trompetter M, de la Rosette J. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: the "golden standard" reclaims its leading position. Curr Opin Urol 2009;19:26-32.
8. Haltbakk J, Hanestad BR, Hunskaar S. How important are mens lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and their impact on the quality of life (QOL)? Qual Life Res 2005;14:1733-1741
9. Rhymer JC, Bell TJ, Perry KC, Ward JP. Hyponatraemia following transurethral resection of the prostate. Br J Urol 1985;57:450-452
10. Ghanem AN, Ward JP. Osmotic and metabolic sequelae of volumetric overload in relation to the TUR syndrome. Br J Urol 1990;66:71-78
11. Hahn RG. Ethanol monitoring of irrigating fluid absorption in transurethral prostatic surgery. Anesthesiology 1988;68: 867-873
12. Hahn RG. Early detection of the TUR syndrome by marking the irrigating fluid with 1% ethanol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1989;33:146-151
13. Sohn MH, Vogt C, Heinen G, Erkens M, Nordmeyer N, Jackse G. Fluid absorption and circulating endotoxins during transurethral resection of the prostate. Br J Urol 1993;72: 605-610
14. Weis N, Jörgensen PE, Bruun E. "TUR syndrome" after transurethral resection of the prostate using suprapubic drainage. Int Urol Nephrol 1987;19:165-169
15. Olsson J, Nilsson A, Hahn RG. Symptoms of the transurethral resection syndrome using glycine as the irrigant. J Urol 1995;154:123-128
16. Hahn RG, Shemais H, Essén P. Glycine 1.0% versus glycine 1.5% as irrigating fluid during transurethral resection of the prostate. Br J Urol 1997;79:394-400.
17. Hahn RG, Sandfelt L, Nyman CR. Double-blind randomized study of symptoms associated with absorption of glycine 1.5% or mannitol 3% during transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 1998;160:397-401.
18. Radal M, Bera AP, Leisner C, Haillot O, Autret-Leca E. Effects indésirables des solutions dirrigation glycollées. Therapie 1999;54:233-236
19. Gonzales R, Brensilver JM, Rovinsky JJ. Posthysteroscopic hyponatremia. Am J Kidney Dis 1994;23:735-738
20. Baggish MS, Brill AI, Rosenzweig B, Barbot JE, Indman PD. Fatal acute glycine and sorbitol toxicity during operative hysteroscopy. J Gynecol Surg 1993;9:137-143
21. Byard RW, Harrison R, Wells R, Gilbert JD. Glycine toxicity and unexpected intra-operative death. J Forensic Sci 2001; 46:1244-1246
22. Ichai C, Cialis JF, Roussel LJ, Levraut J, Candito M, Boileau P. Intravascular absorption of glycine irrigating solution during shoulder arthroscopy: a case report and follow-up study. Anesthesiology 1996;85:1481-1485
23. Norris HT, Aasheim GM, Sherrard DJ, Tremann JA. Symptomatology, pathophysiology and treatment of the transurethral resection of the prostate syndrome. Br J Urol 1973;45: 420-427
24. Inman RD, Hussain Z, Elves AW, Hallworth MS, Jones PW, Coppinger SW. A comparison of 1.5% glycine and 2.7% sorbitol-0.5% mannitol irrigants during transurethral prostate resection. J Urol 2001;166:2216-2220
25. Hahn RG, Nennesmo I, Rais J, Sundelin B, Wroblewski R, Zhang W. Morphological and X-ray microanalytical changes in mammalian tissue after overhydration with irrigating fluids. Eur Urol 1996;29:355-361
26. Reich O, Gratzke C, Stief CG. Techniques and long-term results of surgical procedures forBPH.Eur Urol 2006;49:970-978
27. Hahn RG. Fluid absorption in endoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006;96:8-20.
28. Konrad C, Gerber HR, Schuepfer G, Schmucki O. Transurethral resection syndrome: effect of the introduction into clinical practice of a new method for monitoring fluid absorption. J Clin Anesth 1998;10:360-365
29. Hahn RG. The use of ethanol to monitor fluid absorption during transurethral resection of the prostate. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1999;33:277-283
30. Desmond J. Serum osmolality and plasma electrolytes in patients who develop dilutional hyponatremia during transurethral resection. Can J Surg 1970;13:116-121
31. Blandy J, Notley R. Complications occurring during transurethral resection. In: Transurethral resection. Oxford: Isis Medical Media; 1998.
32. Madsen PO, Naber KG. The importance of the pressure in the prostatic fossa and absorption of irrigating fluid during transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 1973;109: 446-452
33. Hahn RG, Ekengren J. Absorption of irrigating fluid and height of the fluid bag during transurethral resection of the prostate. Br J Urol 1993;72:80-83
34. van Renen RG, Reymann U. Comparison of the effect of two heights of glycine irrigation solution on serum sodium and osmolality during transurethral prostatic resection of the prostate. Aust N Z J Surg 1997;67:874-877
35. Reuter M, Reuter HJ. Prevention of irrigant absorption during TURP: continuous low-pressure irrigation. Int Urol Nephrol 1978;10:293-300.
36. Hubert J, Cormier L, Gerbaud PF, Guillemin F, Pertek JP, Mangin P. Computer-controlled monitoring of bladder pressure in the prevention of "TUR-syndrome": a randomized study of 53 cases. Br J Urol 1996;78:228-233
37. Hahn RG. Intravesical pressure during fluid absorption in transurethral resection of the prostate. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2000;34:102-108
38. Heidler H. Frequency and causes of fluid absorption: a comparison of three techniques for resection of the prostate under continuous pressure monitoring. Br J Urol 1999;83: 619-622
39. Hahn RG, Ekengren J. Patterns of irrigating fluid absorption during transurethral resection of the prostate as indicated by ethanol. J Urol 1993;149:502-506
40. Williams EL, Hildebrand KL, McCormick SA, Bedel MJ. The effect of intravenous lactated Ringers solution versus 0.9% sodium chloride solution on serum osmolality in human volunteers. Anesth Analg 1999;88:999-1003.
41. Wilkes NJ, Woolf R, Mutch M, Mallet SV, Peachey T, Stephens R, et al. The effects of balanced versus saline-based hetastarch and crystalloid solutions on acid-base and electrolyte status and gastric mucosal perfusion in elderly surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2001;93:811-816
42. Grove JJ, Shinaman RC, Drover DR. Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema and venous air embolus as complication of operative hysteroscopy. J Clin Anesth 2004;16:48-50.
43. Arieff AI. Fatal postoperative pulmonary edema: pathogenesis and literature review. Chest 1999;115:1371-1377
44. Olsson J, Hahn RG. Glycine toxicity after high-dose i.v. infusion of 1.5% glycine in the mouse. Br J Anaesth 1999;82: 250-254
45. Michielsen DP, Debacker T, De Boe V, Van Lersberghe C, Kaufman L, Braeckman JG, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline - an alternative surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol 2007;178:2035-2039
46. Ho HS, Yip SK, Lim KB, Fook S, Foo KT, Cheng CW. A prospective randomized study comparing monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) System. Eur Urol 2007;52: 517-524
47. Singh H, Desai MR, Shrivastav P, Vani K. Bipolar versus monopolar resection of the prostate: randomized controlled study. J Endourol 2005;19:333-338
48. Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Stock C, Teber D, de la Rosette J. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate - technical modifications and early clinical experience. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007;16:11-21.
49. Tefekli A, Muslumanoglu AY, Baykal M, Binbay M, Tas A, Altunrende F. A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol 2005;174:1339-1343
50. Erturhan S, Erbagci A, Seckiner I, Yagci F, Ustun A. Plasmakinetic resection of the prostate versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2007;10:97-100.
51. Rose A, Suttor S, Goebell PJ, Rossi R, Rübben H. Transurethrale resektion von Blasentumoren und Prostataadenomen in physiologischer Kochsalzlösung (TURIS). Urologe 2007;9:1148-1150
52. Ho H, Lim KB. Re: Bipolar transurethral resection in saline an alternative surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction? Michielsen DP, Debacker T, De Boe V, et al. J Urol 2007;178:2035-2039. J Urol 2008;179:2482-2483
53. Yang S, Lin WC, Chang HK, Hsu JM, Lin WR, Chow YC, et al. Gyrus plasmasect: is it better than monopolar transurethral resection of prostate? Urol Int 2004;73:258-261
54. Nuhoglu B, Ayyildiz A, Karagüzel E, Cebeci O, Germiyanoglu C. Plasmakinetic prostate resection in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: results of 1-year follow-up. Int J Urol 2006;13:21-24
55. Issa MM. Technical advances in transurethral resection of the prostate: bipolar versus monopolar TURP. J Endourol 2008;22:1578-1595
56. Seckiner I, Yesilli C, Akduman B, Altan K, Mungan NA. A prospective randomized study for comparing bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with standard TURP. Urol Int 2006;76:139-143
57. Akayöz M, Kaygisiz O, Akdemir O, Aki FT, Adsan O, Cetinkaya M. Comparison of transurethral resection and plasmakinetic transurethral resection applications with regard to fluid absorption amounts in benign prostate hyperplasia. Urol Int 2006;77:143-147
58. Abascal Junquera JM, Cecchini Rosell L, Salvador Lacambra C, Martos Calvo R, Celma Domenech A, Morote Robles J. Reseccion transuretral de prostata bipolar vs monopolar: analisis peroperatorio de los resultados. Actas Urol Esp 2006;30:661-666
59. Patankar S, Jamkar A, Dobhada S, Gorde V. Plasmakinetic superpulse transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral resection of prostate. J Endourol 2006;20:215-219
60. Iori F, Franco G, Leonardo C, Laurenti C, Tubaro A, DAmico F, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection of prostate: clinical and urodynamic evaluation. Urology 2008;71:252-255
61. Bhansali M, Patankar S, Dobhada S, Khaladkar S. Management of large (> 60 g) prostate gland: plasmakinetic superpulse (bipolar) versus conventional (monopolar) transurethral resection of the prostate. J Endourol 2009;23: 141-145
62. Autorino R, Damiano R, Di Lorenzo G, Quarto G, Perdona S, DArmiento M. Four-year outcome of a prospective randomised trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urol 2009;55:922-929
63. de Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G, Damiano R, Perdona S, di Lorenzo G, et al. Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial. Urology 2006;67:69-72.