Estimating the aggregate value of forest recreation in a regional context

Journal of Forest Economics

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 205-216

  Bujosa Bestard, Angel ^a   Riera Font, Antoni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aggregate value; Discrete count linked model; Forests; Recreation demand; Travel cost method

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATES; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS;

COSTS AND BENEFITS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FORESTS; GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION; INFORMATION REQUIREMENT; LINKED MODEL; RECREATION DEMAND; TRAVEL COST METHOD;

FORESTRY;

FOREST; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY;

BALEARIC ISLANDS; MAJORCA; MEDITERRANEAN SEA; SPAIN;

EID: 77955511590     PISSN: 11046899     EISSN: 16181530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2009.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bateman I.J., Lovett A.A., Brainard J.S. Developing a methodology for benefit transfers using geographical information systems: modelling demand for woodland recreation. Regional Studies 1999, 33(3):191-205.
2. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand 1985, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Bhat C.R. Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel mode choice modeling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 1998, 32(7):495-507.
4. Bockstael N.E., Freeman A.M. Welfare theory and valuation. Handbook of Environmental Economics 2005, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
5. Bockstael N.E., Hanemann W.M., Kling C.L. Estimating the value of water quality improvements in a recreational demand framework. Water Resources Research 1987, 23(5):951-960.
6. Bockstael, N.E., Hanemann, W.M., Strand, I.E., 1986. Measuring the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements using Recreation Demand Models. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
7. Bockstael, N.E., McConnell, K.E., 2007. Environmental and Resource Valuation with Revealed Preferences, vol. 7. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
8. Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L. Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 2002, 23(4):421-446.
9. Brainard J., Bateman I., Lovett A. Modelling demand for recreation in English woodlands. Forestry 2001, 74(5):423-438.
10. Cameron A.C., Trivedi P.K. Econometric models based on count data: comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics 1986, 1(1):29-53.
11. Caulkins P.P., Bishop R.C., Bouwes N.W. The travel cost model for lake recreation: a comparison of two methods for incorporating site quality and substitution effects. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1986, 68(2):291-297.
12. Englin J., Shonkwiler J.S. Modeling recreation demand in the presence of unobservable travel costs: toward a travel price model. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1995, 29(3):368-377.
13. Garber-Yonts, B.E., 2005. Conceptualizing and Measuring Demand for Recreation on National Forests: A Review and Synthesis. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
14. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis 2003, Pearson Education Inc, NJ. fifth ed.
15. Greene, W.H., 2007. NLOGIT Version 4.0, Econometric Software, Plainview, NY.
16. Haab T.C., McConnell K.E. Count data models and the problem of zeros in recreation demand analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1996, 78(1):89-102.
17. Hanemann, W.M., 1982. Applied welfare analysis with qualitative response models. CUDARE Working Papers. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
18. Hausman J., Hall B.H., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R & D relationship. Econometrica 1984, 52(4):909-938.
19. Hausman J.A., Leonard G.K., McFadden D. A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage. Journal of Public Economics 1995, 56(1):1-30.
20. Heal G.M., Barbier E.B., Boyle K.J., Covich A., Gloss S.P., Hershner C.H., et al. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Towards Better Environmental Decision-making 2005, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
21. Herriges J.A., Kling C.L., Phaneuf D.J. Corner solution models of recreation demand: a comparison of competing frameworks. Valuing Recreation and the Environment 1999, 163-197. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. J.A. Herriges, C.L. Kling (Eds.).
22. Herriges J.A., Phaneuf D.J. Inducing patterns of correlation and substitution in repeated logit models of recreation demand. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2002, 84(4):1076-1090.
23. Hill G.W., Courtney P.R. Demand analysis projections for recreational visits to countryside woodlands in Great Britain. Forestry 2006, 79(2):185-200.
24. Hutchinson W.G., Scarpa R., Chilton S.M., McCallion T. Spatial distribution versus efficiency effects of forest recreation policies using a regional travel cost model. The New Economics of Outdoor Recreation 2003, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. N. Hanley, W.D. Shaw, R.E. Wright (Eds.).
25. Kaoru Y., Smith V.K., Liu J.L. Using random utility models to estimate the recreational value of estuarine resources. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1995, 77(1):141-151.
26. Knoche S., Lupi F. Valuing deer hunting ecosystem services from farm landscapes. Ecological Economics 2007, 64(2):313-320.
27. Long J.S. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables 1997, Sage Publications, London.
28. Loomis, J., 2005. Updated outdoor recreation use values on national forests and other public lands. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-658, USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
29. Lutz J., Englin J., Shonkwiler J.S. On the aggregate value of recreational activities: a nested price index approach using poisson demand systems. Environmental and Resource Economics 2000, 15(3):217-226.
30. Maddala G.S. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics 1983, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics 1974, 105-142. Academic Press, New York. P. Zarembka (Ed.).
32. McFadden D. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications 1981, 198-272. The MIT Press, Cambridge. C.F. Manski, D. McFadden (Eds.).
33. McFadden D.L. Regression-based specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Journal of Econometrics 1987, 34:63-82.
34. McFadden D., Train K.E. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2000, 15(5):447-470.
35. Morey E.R., Rowe R.D., Watson M. A repeated nested-logit model of Atlantic Salmon fishing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1993, 75:579-592.
36. Parsons G.R., Jakus P.M., Tomasi T. A comparison of welfare estimates from four models for linking seasonal recreational trips to multinomial logit models of site choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1999, 38(2):143-157.
37. Pearce D., Atkinson G., Mourato S. Cost-benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments 2006, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
38. Phaneuf D.J. A dual approach to modeling corner solutions in recreation demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1999, 37(1):85-105.
39. Phaneuf D.J., Smith V.K. Recreation demand models. Handbook of Environmental Economics: Valuing Environmental Changes 2005, Elsevier, Amsterdam. K.-G. Mäler, J. Vincent (Eds.).
40. Revelt D., Train K. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1998, 80(4):647-657.
41. Selman, P., Powell, J., 2003. Woodland wealth appraisal for the East of England. Countryside and Community Research Unit, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucestershire.
42. Shrestha R.K., Stein T.V., Clark J. Valuing nature-based recreation in public natural areas of the Apalachicola River region, Florida. Journal of Environmental Management 2007, 85(4):977-985.
43. Siderelis C., Moore R.L. Recreation demand and the influence of site preference variables. Journal of Leisure Research 1998, 30(3):301-318.
44. Small K.A., Rosen H.S. Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1981, 49(1):105-130.
45. Smith V.K. Welfare effects, omitted variables, and the extent of the market. Land Economics 1993, 69(2):121-131.
46. Train K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
47. Turner R.K., Paavola J., Cooper P., Farber S., Jessamy V., Georgiou S. Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics 2003, 46(3):493-510.
48. Vaughan W.J., Russell C.S., Hazilla M. A note on the use of travel cost models with unequal zonal populations: comment. Land Economics 1982, 58(3):400-407.
49. Ward F.A., Beal D. Valuing Nature with Travel Cost 2000, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.