A dual approach to modeling corner solutions in recreation demand

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 85-105

  Phaneuf, Daniel J ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGLING; METHODOLOGY; MODELING; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY;

UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

EID: 0032873534     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1998.1053     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bockstael N. E., Hanemann W. M., Kling C. L. Estimating the value of water quality improvements in a recreation demand framework. Water Resources. Res. 23:1987;951-960.
2. Bockstael N. E., Hanemann W. M., Strand I. E. Measuring the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Using Recreation Demand Models. 1986;U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyOffice of Policy Analysis, Washington.
3. Creel M., Loomis J. B. Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. Amer. J. Agri. Econom. 72:1990;434-445.
4. Christensen L. R., Jorgenson D. W., Lau L. J. Transcendental logarithmic utility functions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 65:1975;367-383.
5. Durrett R. Probability: Theory and Examples. 1996;Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont.
6. Englin J., Lambert D., Shaw W. D. A structural equations approach to modeling consumptive recreation demand. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 33:1997;33-43.
7. Edgerton D. L. Weak separability and the estimation of elasticities in multistage demand systems. Amer. J. Agri. Econom. 79:1997;62-79.
8. Edgerton D. L. On the estimation of separable demand models. J. Agri. Res. Econom. 18:1993;141-146.
9. Feather P., Hellerstein D., Tomasi T. A discrete-count model of recreation demand. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 30:1996;316-322.
10. Freeman A. M. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. 1993;Resources for the Future, Washington.
11. Gelman A., Carlin J. B., Stern H. S., Rubin D. B. Bayesian Data Analysis. 1995;Chapman and Hall, London.
12. Geweke J. Monte Carlo simulation and numerical integration. Handbook of Computational Economics. 1996;Elsevier Science B.V. Amsterdam.
13. Goddard E. W., Amuah A. K. The demand for Canadian fats and oils: A case study of advertising effectiveness. Amer. J. Agri. Econom. 71:1989;741-749.
14. Hajivassiliou V. A., McFadden D. L., Ruud P. Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives: Theoretical and computational results. J. Econometrics. 72:1996;85-134.
15. Hausman J. A., Leonard G. K., McFadden D. A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model: Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage. J. Public Econom. 56:1995;1-30.
16. J. A. Herriges, C. L. Kling, Nonlinear income effects in random utility models, Rev. Econom. Statist.
17. Krinsky I., Robb A. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticties. Rev. Econom. Statist. 68:1986;715-719.
18. LaFrance J. T. Weak separability in applied welfare analysis. Amer. J. Agri. Econom. 75:1993;770-775.
19. Lee L. F., Pitt M. M. Microeconometric demand systems with binding nonnegativity constraints: The dual approach. Econometrica. 54:1986;1237-1242.
20. Lee L. F., Pitt M. M. Microeconometric models of rationing, imperfect markets, and nonnegativity constraints. J. Econometrics. 36:1987;89-110.
21. A. J. Lyke, Discrete Choice Models to Value Changes in Environmental Quality: A Great Lakes Case Study, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1993.
22. Maler K. Environmental Economics. 1974;Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore.
23. McConnell K. E., Strand I. E. Measuring the cost of time in recreation demand analysis: An application to sport fishing. Amer. J. Agri. Econom. 63:1981;153-156.
24. McFadden D. Computing willingness-to-pay in random utility models. Moore J., Riezman R., Melvin J. Trade, Theory, and Econometrics: Essays in Honour of John S. Chipman. 1998;Routledge, London.
25. Morey E. R., Waldman D., Assane D., Shaw D. Searching for a model of multiple-site recreation demand that admits interior and boundary solutions. Amer. J. Agri. Econom. 77:1995;129-140.
26. Parsons G. R., Kealy M. J. A demand theory for number of trips in a random utility model of recreation. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 29:1996;418-433.
27. D. J. Phaneuf, Generalized Corner Solution Models in Recreation Demand, Department of Economics, Iowa State University, 1997.
28. D. J. Phaneuf, C. L. Kling, J. A. Herriges, Estimation and Welfare Calculations in a Generalized Corner Solution Model with an Application to Recreation Demand, Iowa State University, 1998.
29. Ransom M. R. The labor supply of married men - a switching regressions model. J. Labor Econom. 5:1987;63-75.
30. Ransom M. R. An empirical model of discrete and continuous choice in family labor supply. Rev. Econom. Statist. 69:1987;465-472.
31. T. C. Srinivasan, Corner Solution Approaches to Modeling Choice, Department of Management, Vanderbilt University, 1989.
32. Srinivasan T. C., Winer R. S. Using neoclassical consumer-choice theory to produce a market map from purchase data. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 12:1994;1-9.
33. Van Soest A., Kooreman P. Coherency of the indirect translog demand system with binding non-negativity constraints. J. Econometrics. 44:1990;391-400.
34. Wales T. J., Woodland A. D. Estimation of consumer demand systems with binding nonnegativity constraints. J. Econometrics. 21:1983;263-285.
35. Yen S. T., Adamowicz W. L. Participation, trip frequency, and site choice: A multinomial Poisson hurdle model of recreation demand. Can. J. Agri. Econom. 42:1994;65-76.