Corrections to Are discrimination thresholds a valid measure of variance for judgments of slant from texture?, [Journal of Vision, 2010, 10(2):20, 1-18, 10.1167/10.2.20];Are discrimination thresholds a valid measure of variance for judgments of slant from texture?

Journal of Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 1-18

  Todd, James T ^a   Christensen, James C ^b   Guckes, Kevin M ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cue integration; Depth; Shape; Slant; Texture

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 77955494577     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/10.3.22     Document Type: Erratum

References (45)

1. Aloimonos, J. (1988). Shape from texture. Biological Cybernetics, 58, 345-360. [PubMed]
2. Backus, B. T., & Saunders, J. A. (2006). The accuracy and reliability of perceived depth from linear perspective as a function of image size. Journal of Vision, 6(9):7, 933-954, http://journalofvision.org/6/9/7/, doi:10.1167/6.9.7.
3. Bajcsy, R., & Lieberman, L. (1976). Texture gradient as a depth cue. Computer Graphics Image Processing, 5, 52-67.
4. Blake, A., & Marinos, C. (1990). Shape from texture: Estimation, isotropy and moments. Artificial Intelligence, 45, 323-380.
5. Blostein, D., & Ahuja, N. (1989). Shape from texture: Integrating texture-element extraction and surface estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 1233-1251.
6. Bradshaw, M. F., Parton, A. D., & Glennerster, A. (2000). The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information. Vision Research, 40, 3725-3734. [PubMed]
7. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436. [PubMed]
8. Braunstein, M. L., & Payne, J. W. (1969). Perspective and form ratio as determinants of relative slant judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 584-590. [Article]
9. Brown, L. G., & Shvayster, H. (1990). Surface orientation from projective foreshortening of isotropic texture autocorrelation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12, 584-588.
10. Buckley, D., & Frisby, J. P. (1993). Interaction of stereo, texture, and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges. Vision Research, 33, 919-934. [PubMed]
11. Clerc, M., & Mallat, S. (2002). The texture gradient equation for recovering shape from texture. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24, 536-549.
12. Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2010). Matching perceived depth from disparity and from velocity: Modeling and psychophysics. Acta Psychologica, 133, 81-89.
13. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433. [PubMed]
14. Gårding, J. (1992). Shape from texture for smooth curved surfaces in perspective projection. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2, 327-350. [Article]
15. Gårding, J. (1993). Shape from texture and contour by weak isotropy. Artificial Intelligence, 64, 243-297. [Article]
16. Gillam, B. (1968). Perception of slant when perspective and stereosis conflict: Experiments with aniseikonic lenses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 299-305. [PubMed]
17. Gillam, B. (1970). Judgments of slant on the basis of foreshortening. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 31-34. [PubMed]
18. Hawkins, D. M., & Wixley, R. A. J. (1986). A note on the transformation of chi-squared variables to normality. The American Statistician, 40, 296-298.
19. Hillis, J. M., Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S., & Landy, M. S. (2002). Combining sensory information: Mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science, 298, 1627-1630. [PubMed]
20. Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S., & Banks, M. S. (2004). Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4(12):1, 967-992, http://journalofvision.org/4/12/1/, doi:10.1167/4.12.1.
21. Johnston, E. B., Cumming, B. J., & Parker, A. J. (1993). Integration of depth modules: Stereopsis and texture. Vision Research, 33, 813-826. [PubMed]
22. Knill, D. C. (1998a). Discriminating surface slant from texture: Comparing human and ideal observers. Vision Research, 38, 1683-1711. [PubMed]
23. Knill, D. C. (1998b). Ideal observer perturbation analysis reveals human strategies for inferring surface orientation from texture. Vision Research, 38, 2635-2656. [PubMed]
24. Knill, D. C., & Saunders, J. (2003). Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Research, 43, 2539-58.
25. Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doorn, A. J. (1996). Illuminance texture due to surface mesostructure. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 13, 452-463.
26. Krumm, J., & Shafer, S. A. (1992). Shape from periodic texture using the spectrogram. Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '92), 284-289. [Article]
27. Malik, J., & Rosenholtz, R. (1994). A computational model for shape from texture. In G. R. Bock & J. A. Goode (Eds.), Higher order processing in the visual system (pp. 272-286). Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
28. Malik, J., & Rosenholtz, R. (1997). Computing local surface orientation and shape from texture for curved surfaces. International Journal of Computer Vision, 23, 149-168. [Article]
29. Marinos, C., & Blake, A. (1990). Shape from texture: The homogeneity hypothesis. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference in Computer Vision, Osaka, Japan, 350-334. [Article]
30. Purdy, W. P. (1958). The hypothesis of psychophysical correspondence in space perception. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 1454. (University Microfilms No. 58-5594).
31. Sakai, K., & Finkel, L. H. (1995). Characterization of spatial frequency spectrum in the perception of shape from texture. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 12, 1208-1224. [PubMed]
32. Super, B. J., & Bovik, A. C. (1995). Planar surface orientation from texture spatial frequencies. Pattern Recognition, 28, 729-743. [Article]
33. Thaler, L., Todd, J. T., & Dijkstra, T. M. H. (2007). The effects of phase on the perception of 3D shape from texture: Psychophysics and modeling. Vision Research, 47, 411-427. [PubMed]
34. Tittle, J. S., & Braunstein, M. L. (1993). Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 157-169. [PubMed]
35. Tittle, J. S., Norman, J. F., Perotti, V. J., & Phillips, F. (1998). The perception of scale-dependent and scale-independent surface structure from binocular disparity, texture, and shading. Perception, 27, 147-166. [PubMed]
36. Tittle, J. S., & Perotti, V. J. (1997). The perception of shape and curvedness from binocular stereopsis and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1167-1179. [PubMed]
37. Tittle, J. S., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Norman, J. F. (1995). The systematic distortion of perceived 3D structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 663-678. [PubMed]
38. Todd, J. T., & Norman, J. F. (2003). The perception of 3D shape from multiple cues: Are observers capable of perceiving metric structure? Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 31-47. [PubMed]
39. Todd, J. T., Oomes, A. H. J., Koenderink, J. J., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2004). The perception of doubly curved surfaces from anisotropic textures. Psychological Science, 15, 40-46. [PubMed]
40. Todd, J. T., & Perotti, V. J. (1999). The visual perception of surface orientation from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1577-1589. [PubMed]
41. Todd, J. T., Thaler, L., & Dijkstra, T. M. H. (2005). The effects of field of view on the perception of 3D slant from texture. Vision Research, 45, 1501-1517. [PubMed]
42. Todd, J. T., Thaler, L., Dijkstra, T. M. H., Koenderink, J. J., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2007). The effects of viewing angle, camera angle and sign of surface curvature on the perception of 3D shape from texture. Journal of Vision, 7(12):9, 1-16, http://journalofvision.org/7/12/9/, doi:10.1167/7.12.9.
43. Van Ee, R., & Erkelens, C. J. (1996). Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception. Vision Research, 36, 43-51. [PubMed]
44. Watt, S. J., Akeley, K., Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2005). Focus cues affect perceived depth. Journal of Vision, 5(10):7, 834-862, http://journalofvision.org/5/10/7/, doi:10.1167/5.10.7.
45. Witkin, A. P. (1981). Recovering surface shape and orientation from texture. Artificial Intelligence, 17, 17-45.