Broadening our approach to teaching evaluation

New Directions for Teaching and Learning

Volumn 2001, Issue 88, 2001, Pages 3-9

  Knapper, Christopher ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744939531     PISSN: 02710633     EISSN: 15360768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tl.32     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Astin, A. W. What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
2. Centra, J. A. Reflective Faculty Evaluation: Enhancing Teaching and Determining Faculty Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
3. d’Apollonia, S and Abrami, P. C. “Navigating Student Ratings of Instruction.” American Psychologist, 1997, 52, 1198-1208.
4. Kember, D. “A Reconceptualisation of the Research into University Academics’ Conceptions of Teaching.” Learning and Instruction, 1997, 7, 255-275.
5. Kember, D and Gow, L. “Orientations to Teaching and their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning.” Journal of Higher Education, 1994, 65, 58-74.
6. Levine, A. “The Remaking of the American University.” Innovative Higher Education, 2001, 25, 253-267.
7. Pascarella, E. T and Terenzini, P. T. How College Affects Students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
8. Ramsden, P and Entwistle, N. J. “Effects of Academic Departments on Students’ Approaches to Studying.” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981, 51, 368-383.
9. Wergin, J. F and Swingen, J. N. Departmental Assessment: How Some Campuses Are Effectively Evaluating the Collective Work of Faculty. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education, 2000.