Overrun by the neighbors: Landscape context affects strength and sign of local adaptation

Ecology

Volumn 91, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2253-2260

  Tack, Ayco J M ^a   Roslin, Tomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Adaptive deme formation; Local adaptation; Maladaptation; Metapopulation; Microevolution; Quercus robur; Spatial context; Specialist herbivores

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; DECIDUOUS TREE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; HERBIVORY; HOST PLANT; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; IMMIGRATION; INSECT; LANDSCAPE; LOCAL ADAPTATION; METAPOPULATION; PARAMETERIZATION; SPATIAL VARIATION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; FINLAND; GEOGRAPHY; INSECT; OAK; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; FINLAND; GEOGRAPHY; INSECTS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; QUERCUS;

HEXAPODA; QUERCUS ROBUR;

EID: 77955463185     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/09-0080.1     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alstad, D. N., G. F. Edmunds, and S. C. Johnson. 1980. Host adaptation, sex ratio, and flight activity in male black pineleaf scale. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 73:665-667.
2. Antonovics, J. 1976. The nature of limits to natural selection. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 63:224-247.
3. Barron, A. B. 2001. The life and death of Hopkins' hostselection principle. Journal of Insect Behavior 14:725-737.
4. Begon, M,. J. L. Harper, and C. R. Townsend. 1996. Ecology: individuals, populations and communities. Third edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
5. Blondel, J,. P. C. Dias, M. Maistre, and P. Perret. 1993. Habitat heterogeneity and life-history variation of Mediterranean blue tits (Parus caeruleus). Auk 110:511-520.
6. Boecklen, W. J., and S. Mopper. 1998. Local adaptation in specialist herbivores: theory and evidence. Pages 64-88 in S. Mopper and S. Y. Strauss, editors. Genetic structure and local adaptation in natural insect populations. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
7. Bridle, J. R., and T. H. Vines. 2007. Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:140-147.
8. Camin, J. H., and P. R. Ehrlich. 1958. Natural selection in water snakes (Natrix sipedon L.) on islands in Lake Erie. Evolution 12:504-511.
9. Clausen, J,. D. D. Keck, and W. M. Hiesey. 1940. Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, Washington, D. C., USA.
10. Cobb, N. S., and T. G. Whitham. 1993. Herbivore deme formation on individual trees: a test case. Oecologia 94:496-502.
11. Corbet, S. A. 1985. Insect chemosensory responses: a chemical legacy hypothesis. Ecological Entomology 10:143-153.
12. Crawley, M. J., and M. Akhteruzzaman. 1988. Individual variation in the phenology of oak trees and its consequences for herbivorous insects. Functional Ecology 2:409-415.
13. Davis, J. M. 2008. Patterns of variation in the influence of natal experience on habitat choice. Quarterly Review of Biology 83:363-380.
14. Davis, J. M., and J. A. Stamps. 2004. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:411-416.
15. Dhondt, A. A., F. Adriaensen, E. Matthysen, and B. Kempenaers. 1990. Nonadaptive clutch sizes in tits. Nature 348:723-725.
16. Dias, P. C. 1996. Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:326-330.
17. Edmunds, G. F. 1973. Ecology of black pineleaf scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae). Environmental Entomology 2:765-777.
18. Edmunds, G. F., and D. N. Alstad. 1978. Coevolution in insect herbivores and conifers. Science 199:941-945.
19. Egan, S. P., and J. R. Ott. 2007. Host plant quality and local adaptation determine the distribution of a gall-forming herbivore. Ecology 88:2868-2879.
20. Facknath, S,. and D. J. Wright. 2007. Is host selection in leafminer adults influenced by pre-imaginal or early adult experience? Journal of Applied Entomology 131:505-512.
21. Gandon, S,. D. Ebert, I. Olivieri, and Y. Michalakis. 1998. Differential adaptation in spatially heterogeneous environments and host-parasite coevolution. Pages 325-342 in S. Mopper and S. Y. Strauss, editors. Genetic structure and local adaptation in natural insect populations. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
22. Garant, D,. S. E. Forde, and A. P. Hendry. 2007. The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation. Functional Ecology 21:434-443.
23. García-Ramos, G., and M. Kirkpatrick. 1997. Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution 51:21-28.
24. Greischar, M. A., and B. Koskella. 2007. A synthesis of experimental work on parasite local adaptation. Ecology Letters 10:418-434.
25. Gripenberg, S,. P. J. Mayhew, M. Parnell, and T. Roslin. 2010. A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecology Letters 13:383-393.
26. Gripenberg, S,. E. Morriën, A. Cudmore, J. P. Salminen, and T. Roslin. 2007. Resource selection by female moths in a heterogeneous environment: what is a poor girl to do? Journal of Animal Ecology 76:854-865.
27. Gripenberg, S,. O. Ovaskainen, E. Morriën, and T. Roslin. 2008. Spatial population structure of a specialist leaf-mining moth. Journal of Animal Ecology 77:757-767.
28. Gripenberg, S,. and T. Roslin. 2005. Host plants as islands: resource quality and spatial setting as determinants of insect distribution. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42:335-345.
29. Gripenberg, S,. and T. Roslin. 2008. Neither the devil nor the deep blue sea: larval mortality factors fail to explain the abundance and distribution of Tischeria ekebladella. Ecological Entomology 33:346-356.
30. Hanski, I,. and D. Simberloff. 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. Pages 5-25 in I. A. Hanski and M. E. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. Hedrick, P. W. 2000. Genetics of populations. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts, USA.
31. Hendry, A. P., and M. T. Kinnison. 1999. Perspective: the pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53:1637-1653.
32. Hereford, J. 2009. A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. American Naturalist 173:579-588.
33. Hering, E. M. 1957. Bestimmungstabellen der Blattminen von Europa einschließlich des Mittelmeerbeckens und der Kanarischen Inseln. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands.
34. Hoeksema, J. D., and S. E. Forde. 2008. A meta-analysis of factors affecting local adaptation between interacting species. American Naturalist 171:275-290.
35. Holt, R. D., and M. S. Gaines. 1992. Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evolutionary Ecology 6:433-447.
36. Hunter, M. D. 1990. Differential susceptibility to variable plant phenology and its role in competition between two insect herbivores on oak. Ecological Entomology 15:401-408.
37. Janz, N,. L. Söderlind, and S. Nylin. 2009. No effect of larval experience on adult host preferences in Polygonia c-album (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): on the persistence of Hopkins' host selection principle. Ecological Entomology 34:50-57.
38. Karban, R. 1989. Fine-scale adaptation of herbivorous thrips to individual host plants. Nature 340:60-61.
39. Kawecki, T. J. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of source-sink population dynamics. Pages 387-414 in I. Hanski and O. E. Gaggiotti, editors. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Academic Press, Oxford, UK.
40. Lajeunesse, M. J., and M. R. Forbes. 2002. Host range and local parasite adaptation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 269:703-710.
41. Lenormand, T. 2002. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:183-189.
42. Linhart, Y. B., and M. C. Grant. 1996. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:237-277.
43. Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, R. D. Wolfinger, and O. Schabenberger. 2006. SAS for mixed models. Second edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
44. Mayhew, P. J. 1997. Adaptive patterns of host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Oikos 79:417-428.
45. McNeilly, T. 1968. Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. III. Agrostis tenuis on a small copper mine. Heredity 23:99-108.
46. Memmott, J,. R. K. Day, and H. C. J. Godfray. 1995. Intraspecific variation in host plant quality: the aphid Cinara cupressi on the Mexican cypress, Cupressus lusitanica. Ecological Entomology 20:153-158.
47. Mopper, S. 1996. Adaptive genetic structure in phytophagous insect populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:235-238.
48. Mopper, S. 2005. Phenology: how time creates spatial structure in endophagous insect populations. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42:327-333.
49. Mopper, S,. M. Beck, D. Simberloff, and P. Stiling. 1995. Local adaptation and agents of selection in a mobile insect. Evolution 49:810-815.
50. Mopper, S,. and D. Simberloff. 1995. Differential herbivory in an oak population: the role of plant phenology and insect performance. Ecology 76:1233-1241.
51. Mopper, S,. P. Stiling, K. Landau, D. Simberloff, and P. Van Zandt. 2000. Spatiotemporal variation in leafminer population structure and adaptation to individual oak trees. Ecology 81:1577-1587.
52. Orzack, S. H., and E. Sober. 1994. Optimality models and the test of adaptationism. American Naturalist 143:361-380.
53. Roslin, T,. S. Gripenberg, J.-P. Salminen, M. Karonen, R. B. O'Hara, K. Pihlaja, and P. Pulkkinen. 2006. Seeing the trees for the leaves: oaks as mosaics for a host-specific moth. Oikos 113:106-120.
54. Roslin, T,. A.-L. Laine, and S. Gripenberg. 2007. Spatial population structure in an obligate plant pathogen colonizing oak Quercus robur. Functional Ecology 21:1168-1177.
55. Slatkin, M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:393-430.
56. Slatkin, M. 1987. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787-792.
57. Southwood, T. R. E. 1961. The number of species of insect associated with various trees. Journal of Animal Ecology 30:1-8.
58. Stearns, S. C., and R. D. Sage. 1980. Maladaptation in a marginal population of the mosquito fish, Gambusia affinis. Evolution 34:65-75.
59. Stiling, P,. and A. M. Rossi. 1998. Deme formation in a dispersive gall-forming midge. Pages 22-36 in S. Mopper and S. Y. Strauss, editors. Genetic structure and local adaptation in natural insect populations. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
60. Stone, G. N., K. Schönrogge, R. J. Atkinson, D. Bellido, and J. Pujade-Villar. 2002. The population biology of oak gall wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Annual Review of Entomology 47:633-668.
61. Thompson, J. N. 1988. Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 47:3-14.
62. Turesson, G. 1922. The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas 3:211-350.
63. Unruh, T. R., and R. F. Luck. 1987. Deme formation in scale insects: a test with the pinyon needle scale and a review of other evidence. Ecological Entomology 12:439-449.
64. Van Zandt, P. A., and S. Mopper. 1998. A meta-analysis of adaptive deme formation in phytophagous insect populations. American Naturalist 152:595-604.