Impact of disability on different domains of health-related quality of life in the noninstitutionalized general population

ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 97-103

  Mar, Javier ^a   Larrañaga, Isabel ^b   Arrospide, Arantzazu ^a   Begiristain, José María ^b  

^a Hospital Alto Deba   (Spain)

^b Basque Government   (Spain)

Author keywords

Disability; Health status; Quality of life; SF 36

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMORBIDITY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFANT; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCHOOL CHILD; SHORT FORM 36; SOCIAL STATUS;

EID: 77955448368     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11786981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s10709     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Regional patterns of disability-free life expectancy and disability-adjusted life expectancy: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349:1347-1352.
2. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997; 349:1436-1442.
3. Murray CJ. Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349:1498-1504.
4. Murray CJL, Lopez AD, editors. The Global Burden of Disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge: Harvard University Press;1996.
5. Rothwell PM. The high cost of not funding stroke research: a comparison with heart disease and cancer. Lancet. 2001;357:1612-1616.
6. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:835-840.
7. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
8. Weisscher N, de Haan RJ, Vermeulen M. The impact of disease-related impairments on disability and health-related quality of life: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:24.
9. Krahn GL, Fujiura G, Drum CE, Cardinal BJ, Nosek MA. The dilemma of measuring perceived health status in the context of disability. Disabil Health J. 2009;2:49-56.
10. Ware JR, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
11. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54.
12. Freedman VA, Martin LG, Schoeni RF. Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States. JAMA. 2002;288:3137-3146.
13. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md Med J. 1965;14:61-65.
14. Encuesta de Salud del País Vasco (ESCAV 2002). Departamento de Sanidad, Gobierno Vasco. http://www.osasun.ejgv.euskadi.net/r52-20726/es/contenidos/informacion/encuesta_salud/es_4044/encues_salud.html.
15. Orfila F, Ferrer M, Lamarca R, Tebe C, Domingo-Salvany A, Alonso J. Gender differences in health-related quality of life among the elderly: The role of objective functional capacity and chronic conditions. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:2367-2380.
16. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273:59-65.
17. Kwiatkowski TG, Libman RB, Frankel M, et al. Effects of tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke at one year. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1781-1787.
18. Mar J, Begiristain, JM, Arrazola A. Cost-effectiveness analysis of throm-bolytic treatment for stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20:193-200.
19. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:4.
20. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27 Suppl 3:S178-S189.
21. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.
22. Graciani A, Banegas JR, Lopez-García E, Rodriguez-Artalejo F. Prevalence of disability and associated social and health-related factors among the elderly in Spain: a population-based study. Maturitas. 2004;48:381-392.
23. Guallar-Castillon P, Redondo-Sendino A, Banegas JR, Lopez-Garcia E, Rodriguez-Artalejo F. Differences in quality of life between women and men in the older population of Spain. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60: 1229-1240.
24. Arostegui I, Núñez-Antón V, Quintana JM. Analysis of the short form-36 (SF-36): the beta-binomial distribution approach. Stat Med. 2007;26(6):1318-1342.
25. Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev. 2000; 71:543-562.
26. Juniper EF, Gordon GH, Willan A, Griffith LE. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire. J Clin Epidem. 1994;47:81-87.
27. Crimmins EM, Saito Y, Reinolds SR. Further evidence on recent trends in the prevalence and incidence of disability among older Americans from two sources: the LSOA and the NHIS. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997;52: S59-S71.
28. Schoeni R, Freedmann VA, Wallace R. Persistent, consistent, wide-spread and robust? Another look at recent trends in old-age disability. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;55:S206-S218.
29. Manton KG, Gu X. Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United Sates black and non-black population above age 65 from 1982 to 1999. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:6354-6359.