A portuguese value set for the SF-6D

Value in Health

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 624-630

  Ferreira, Lara N ^a,c   Ferreira, Pedro L ^b,c   Pereira, Luis N ^a   Brazier, John ^d   Rowen, Donna ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALGARVE   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

health related quality of life; preference based measure; SF 6D; system weight

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PORTUGAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHORT FORM 6D; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 77955409780     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00701.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002 21 : 271 292.
2. Marra C, Woolcott J, Kopec J, et al. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and The HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med 2005 60 : 1571 1582.
3. Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A, Busschbach J. A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ 2004 13 : 873 884.
4. Ferreira P, Ferreira L, Pereira L. How consistent are health utility values? Qual Life Res 2008 17 : 1031 1042.
5. Lamers L, Bouwmans C, van Straten A, et al. Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in mental health patients. Health Econ 2006 15 : 1229 1236.
6. Marra C, Esdaile J, Guh D, et al. A comparison of four indirect methods of assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis. Med Care 2004 42 : 1125 1131.
7. Petrou S, Hockley C. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population. Health Econ 2005 14 : 1169 1189.
8. Pickard A, Simon J, Jeffrey A, Feeny D. Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life in stroke. Qual Life Res 2005 14 : 207 219.
9. Stavem K, Frøland S, Hellum K. Comparison of preference-based utilities of the 15D, EQ-5D and SF-6D in patients with HIV/AIDS. Qual Life Res 2005 14 : 971 980.
10. McTaggart-Cowan H, Marra C, Yang Y, et al. The validity of generic and condition-specific preference-based instruments: the ability to discriminate asthma control status. Qual Life Res 2008 17 : 453 462.
11. McCabe C, Brazier J, Gilks P, et al. Using rank data to estimate health state utility models. J Health Econ 2006 25 : 418 431.
12. Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G, et al. Guide to Design and Development Health-State Utility Instrumentation. Working Paper Series. Ontario : McMaster University Press, 1990.
13. Brazier J, Roberts J, Platts M, Zoellner Y. Estimating a preference-based index for a menopause specific health quality of life questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005 3 : 13.
14. McCabe C, Stevens K, Roberts J, Brazier J. Health state values for the HUI2 descriptive system: results from a UK survey. Health Econ 2005 14 : 231 244.
15. Rabe-Hesketh S, Everitt B. A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using Stata (4th ed.). Boca Raton, FL : Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2007.
16. Baum C. An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata (1st ed.). College Station, TX : Stata Press, 2006.
17. Liang K-Y, Zeger S. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986 73 : 13 22.
18. Zeger SL, Liang K-Y. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986 42 : 121 130.
19. Cui J, Qian G. Selection of Working Correlation Structure and Best Model in GEE Analyses of Longitudinal Data. Comm Statist Simulation Comput 2007 36 : 987 996.
20. Pan W. Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics 2001 57 : 120 125.
21. Jones A. Applied Econometrics for Health Economists - A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford : Office of Health Economics, 2007.
22. Jones A, Rice N, Bago d'Uva T, Balia S. Applied Health Economics (1st ed.). London, UK : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2007.
23. Brazier J, Roberts J. The estimation of a Preference-Based Measure of Health from the SF-12. Med Care 2004 42 : 851 859.
24. Lam C, Brazier J, McGhee S. Valuation of the SF-6D health states is feasible, acceptable, reliable, and valid in a Chinese population. Value Health 2008 11 : 295 303.
25. Brazier J, Fukahara S, Roberts J, et al. Estimating a preference-based index from the Japanese SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 62 : 1323 1331.
26. Dolan P. Modelling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997 35 : 1095 1108.
27. Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 51 : 1115 1128.
28. Dolan P. Modelling valuations for health states: the effect of duration. Health Policy 1996 38 : 189 203. (Pubitemid 26338161)
29. Stratmann-Schoene D, Kuehn T, Kreienberg R, Leidl R. A preference-based index for the SF-12. Health Econ 2006 15 : 553 564.