'Exploratory landscape scenarios' in the formulation of 'landscape quality objectives'

Futures

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 682-692

  Ramos, Isabel Loupa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; RURAL AREA; RURAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER;

BEJA [PORTUGAL]; MERTOLA; PORTUGAL;

EID: 77955276843     PISSN: 00163287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. COE, European Landscape Convention, Florence, CETS No. 176, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2000.
2. G. Groom, Methodological review of existing classifications, in: D. Wascher (Eds.), Landscape Character Areas: Typologies, Cartography and Indicators for the Assessment of Sustainable Landscapes, Alterra Report No. 1254, 2005, pp. 32-45.
3. Lüginbuhl Y. Landscape and Identification, Assessment and Quality Objectives, Landscape and Sustainable Development: Challenges of the European Landscape Convention 2006, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, pp. 97-115.
4. Olwig K. The practice of landscape conventions and the just landscape: the case of the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research 2007, 32(5):579-594.
5. Prieur M., Durousseau S. Landscape and Public Participation. Landscape and Sustainable Development: Challenges of the European Landscape Convention 2006, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, pp. 163-207.
6. Jones M. The European Landscape Convention and the question of public participation. Landscape Research 2007, 32(5):613-633.
7. Potschin M., Klug H., Haines-Young R. From Vision to Action: Framing the Leitbild Concept in the context of Landscape Planning. Futures 2010, 42(7):656-667.
8. Klug H. Participative landscape planning using a GIS approach for facilitation. Multifunctional Land Use: Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services 2007, 195-233. Springer, Berlin. U. Mander, K. Helming, H. Wiggering (Eds.).
9. Costanza R. A vision of the future of science: reintegration of the study of humans and the rest of nature. Futures 2003, 35(6):651-671.
10. Antrop M. Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 75(3-4):187-197.
11. Baptista F. Agriculturas e Territórios 2001, Celta Editora, Oeiras.
12. Mormont M. Le rural comme catégorie de lecture du social. L'Europe et ses Campagnes 1996, 161-176. Presses des Sciences Politiques, Paris. M. Jollivet, N. Eizner (Eds.).
13. R. Soliva, K. Rønningen, I. Bella, P. Bezak, T. Cooper, B. Flø, P. Marty, C. Potter, Envisioning upland futures: stakeholder responses to scenarios for Europe's mountain landscapes, Journal of Rural Studies 24 (1) (2008) 56-71.
14. Pinto-Correia T., Gustavsson R., Pirnat J. Bridging the gap between centrally defined policies and local decisions: towards more sensitive and creative rural landscape management. Landscape Ecology 2006, 21(3):333-346.
15. Primdahl J., Peco B., Schramek J., Andersen E., Oñate J.J. Environmental effects of agri-environmental schemes in Western Europe. Journal of Environmental Management 2003, 67(2):129-138.
16. Gottschalk T., Diekotter T., Ekschmitt K., Weinmann B., Kuhlmann F., Purtauf T., Dauber J., Wolters V. Impact of agricultural subsidies on biodiversity at the landscape level. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22(5):643-656.
17. Potter C. Competing narratives for the future of European agriculture: the agri-environmental consequences of neoliberalization in the context of the Doha Round. The Geographical Journal 2006, 172(3):190-196.
18. van der Ploeg J., Renting H., Brunori G., Knickel K., Mannion J., Marsden T., Roest K., Sevilla-Guzmán E., Ventura F. Rural Development: from practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis 2000, 40(4):391-408.
19. Wilson G. From productivism to post-productivism ... and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2001, 26:77-102.
20. Jones M., Emmelin L. Scenario Studies for the Rural Environment 1995, 405-413. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. J. Shoute, P. Finke, F. Veeneklass, H. Wolfert (Eds.).
21. Palang H., Alumäe H., Mander Ü. Holistic aspects in landscape development: a scenario approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 50(1-3):85-94.
22. Dockerty T., Lovett A., Appleton K., Bone A., Sunnenberg G. Developing scenarios and visualizations to illustrate potential policy and climatic influences on future agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2006, 114(1):103-120.
23. D. Cairol, Multifunctionality of agriculture and rural areas: from trade negotiations to contributing to sustainable development, New Challenges for research, Summary of main results of the European project Multagri, Sixth Framework Research Programme, 2005.
24. Wiggering H., Dalchow C., Glemnitz M., Helming K., Muller K., Schultz A., Stachow U., Zander P. Indicators for multifunctional land use-linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecological Indicators 2006, 6(1):238-249.
25. Hamblin A. Vision of future landscapes. Proceedings of the Australian academy of science. Fenner Conference on the Environment 1999, A. Hamblin (Ed.).
26. Potschin M., Haines-Young R. Rio+10" , sustainability science and landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 75(3-4):162-174.
27. Rotmans J., van Asselt M., Anastasi C., Greeuw S., Mellors J., Peters S., Rothman D., Rijkens N. Visions for a sustainable Europe. Futures 2000, 32(9-10):809-831.
28. Biggs R., Raudsepp-Hearne C., Atkinson-Palombo C., Bohensky E., Boyd E., Cundill G., Fox H., Ingram S., Kok K., Spehar S., Tengö M., Timmer D., Zurek M. Linking futures across scales: a dialog on multiscale scenarios. Ecology and Society 2007, 12(1):17. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art17/.
29. Naveh Z. Towards a transdisciplinary landscape science. Studies in Landscape Ecology 2005, 346-354. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J. Wiens, M. Moss (Eds.).
30. Naranjo F. Landscape and spatial planning, Landscape and sustainable development: challenges of the European Landscape Convention 2006, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, pp. 53-79.
31. Porter M. Competitive Advantage 1985, The Free Press, New York.
32. Schwartz P. The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World 1996, Currency Doubleday, New York.
33. Kahn H., Wiener A. The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next 33 Years 1967, Macmillan, New York.
34. de Jouvenel H. A brief methodological guide to scenario building. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2000, 65(1):37-48.
35. Godet M. Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool 2001, Economica, London.
36. Van der Heijden K. Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation 1996, Wiley, Chichester.
37. Ringland G. Scenario Planning 1998, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
38. P. Liotta, A. Shearer, The use of scenarios in assessing climate change, human security, and potential outcomes, International Workshop on Human Security and Climate Change, Global Environmental Change and Human Security, 2005, http://www.gechs.org/2005/06/24/holmen_workshop/.
39. Ralston B., Wilson I. The Scenario Planning Handbook: Developing Strategies in Uncertain Times 2006, Thomson/South-West, Crawfordsville.
40. Schwartz P., Ogilvy J. Plotting your scenarios. Learning from the Future: Competitive Foresight Scenarios 1998, 57-80. Wiley & Sons, New York. L. Fahey, R. Randall (Eds.).
41. Alcamo J. Scenarios as Tools for International Environmental Assessments 2001, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
42. Van Notten P., Rotmans J., van Asselt M., Rothman D. An updated scenario typology. Futures 2003, 35(5):423-443.
43. Börjeson L., Höjer M., Dreborg K., Ekvall T., Finnveden G. Scenario types and techniques: towards a user's guide. Futures 2006, 38(7):723-739.
44. Busch G. Future European agricultural landscapes-what can we learn from existing quantitative land use scenario studies?. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2006, 114(1):121-140.
45. Verburg P., Rounsevell M., Veldkamp A. Scenario-based studies of future land use in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2006, 114(1):1-6.
46. I.L.Ramos. As dinâmicas da paisagem rural: a formulação de cenários como instrumento de apoio ao planeamento, PhD Dissertation. Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, 2008.
47. EEA, Land-use scenarios for Europe: qualitative and quantitative analysis on a European scale, European Environment Agency, Technical report no. 9/2007, Copenhagen, 2007.
48. Zurek M., Henrichs T. Linking scenarios across geographical scales in international environmental assessment. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2007, 74(8):1282-1295.
49. Wollenberg E., Edmunds D., Buck L. Using scenarios to make decisions about the future: anticipatory learning for adaptative co-management of community forests. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 47(1-2):65-77.
50. Chermack T. Disciplined imagination: building scenarios and building theories. Futures 2007, 39(1):1-15.
51. Bell W. Creativity, skepticism, and visioning the future. Futures 2005, 37(5):429-432.
52. Turoff M. The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 1970, 2(2):149-171.
53. Tapio P. Disaggregative policy Delphi: using cluster analysis as a tool for systematic scenario formation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2002, 70:83-101.
54. Gordon T., Pease A. RT Delphi: an efficient, round-less almost real time Delphi method. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2006, 73:321-333.
55. Nassauer J., Corry R. Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 2004, 19(4):343-356.
56. Nassauer J., Corry R., Cruse R. Alternative future landscape scenarios: a means to consider agricultural policy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2002, 57(2):44A-53A.
57. Hulse D., Gregory S., Baker J. Willamette River Basin Planning Atlas 2002, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR.
58. Steinitz C., Rojo H., Bassett S., Goode T., Maddock T., Mouat D., Peiser R., Shearer A. Alternative Futures for Changing Landscapes: the Upper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonora 2003, Island Press, Washington.
59. Tress B., Tress G. Scenarios visualisation for participatory landscape planning-a study from Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 64(3):161-178.
60. Dockerty T., Lovett A., Sunnenberg G., Appleton K., Perry M. Visualizing potential impacts of climate change on rural. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2005, 29(3):297-320.
61. Sheppard S. Landscape visualisation and climate change: the potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science & Policy 2005, 8(6):637-654.
62. Dolman P., Lovett A., O'Riordan T., Cobb D. Designing whole landscapes. Landscape Research 2001, 26(4):305-335.
63. Lange E., Hehl-Lange S. Making visions visible for long-term landscape management. Futures 2010, 42(7):693-699.
64. Artner A., Frohnmeyer U., Matzdorf B., Rudolph I., Rother J., Stark G. Future Landscapes: Perspektiven der Kulturlandschaft, Bundesmnisterium für Verkehr 2006, Bau und Stadtentwicklung, Berlin.
65. Appleton K., Lovett A., Sunenberg G., Dockerty T. Rural landscape visualisation from GIS databases: a comparison of approaches, options and problems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2002, 26(3):141-162.
66. Appleton K., Lovett A. GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: defining 'sufficient' realism for environmental decision making. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 65(3):117-131.
67. J. Hofschreuder, Visual criteria in detail: correlation between the required level of detail of 3D-landscape visualisations and visual criteria, Minor thesis land use planning (K100-247), Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule Zuerich, 2004.
68. Sheppard S. Guidance for crystal ball gazers: developing a code of ethics for landscape visualisation. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 54(1-4):183-199.
69. OECD The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance 2006, OECD, Paris.
70. van Notten P., Sleegers A.M., van Asselt M. The future shocks: on discontinuity and scenario development. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2005, 72:175-194.
71. H. Pereira, T. Domingos, L. Vicente, Report on the user needs and response options, Portuguese Sub-Global Assessment of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2003, http://www.ecossistemas.org/.
72. Van Dijk J. Delphi questionnaires versus individual and group interviews: a comparison case. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1990, 37(3):293-304.
73. Barbanente A., Khakee A., Puglisi M. Scenario building for metropolitan Tunis. Futures 2002, 34(7):583-596.
74. Kok K., Rothman D., Patel M. Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development. Futures 2006, 38(3):261-284.
75. Patel M., Kok K., Rothman D. Participatory planning in land use analysis: an insight into the experiences and opportunities created by stakeholder involvement in scenario construction in northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 2007, 24(3):546-561.
76. Carlsson-Kanyama A., Dreborg H., Moll H.C., Padovan D. Participative backcasting: a tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning. Futures 2008, 40(1):34-46.
77. Klug H. Application of a Leitbild in the Lake District of Salzburg. Futures 2010, 42(7):668-681.
78. A. Abreu, T. Pinto-Correia, R. Oliveira, Contributos para a identificação e caracterização da paisagem em Portugal continental, DGOTDU, Colecção de Estudos 10, Lisboa, 2004.
79. A. van Doorn, T. Pinto-Correia, Refining the concept of land abandonment: experiences from southern Portugal, in: B. Bunce, R. Jongman (Eds.), IALE Publication Series 3, IALE, Wageningen, 2006, pp. 147-159.
80. Nassauer J. Using cultural knowledge to make a new landscape patterns. Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology 2005, 274-280. Cambridge Press, Cambridge. J. Wiens, M. Moss (Eds.).
81. van Ittersum M., Rabbinge R., van Latesteijn H.C. Exploratory land use studies and their role in strategic policy making. Agricultural Systems 1998, 58(3):309-330.