Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 458-464

  Park, Jae Kyoung ^a   Choi, Jin Uk ^a   Jeon, Young Chan ^a   Choi, Kyung Soo ^a,b   Jeong, Chang Mo ^a  

^a Pusan National University   (South Korea)

^b Private Practice   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Implant connection systems; Screw preload; Tungsten carbide carbon coating

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CARBON; DENTAL ALLOY; TITANIUM; TUNGSTEN CARBIDE; TUNGSTEN DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; ROTATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE;

CARBON; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; ROTATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TORQUE; TUNGSTEN COMPOUNDS;

EID: 77955263203     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00595.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981, 10:387-416.
2. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U. A long-term follow up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990, 5:347-359.
3. Van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C. The applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990, 5:272-281.
4. Linquist LW, Carlsson GE, Carson TJ. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prosthesis supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996, 7:329-336.
5. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prothet Dent 1983, 50:399-410.
6. Jemt T. Multicenter study of overdenture supported by Branemark. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992, 7:513-522.
7. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications with implants and implant prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 2003, 90:121-132.
8. Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991, 6:29-36.
9. Becker W, Becker BE. Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1995, 74:51-55.
10. Anderson B, Odman P, Carlsson L. A new Branemark single tooth abutment: handling and early clinical experience. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992, 7:105-111.
11. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998, 79:74-78.
12. Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Haack JE. External strain distribution on implant prosthetic components. J Dent Res 1994, 73:232. Abstract 1045
13. McGlumphy EA, Mendel DA, Holloway JA. Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clinics North Am 1998, 42:71-89.
14. Griffith HT. Suggested tightening torques for structural bolts. Fastener Technolog/February 1987. Torque Tensioning: A Ten Part Complication 1987, In, Stow, OH, Fastener Technology, Jan-Dec
15. Sakaguchi RL, Borgersen SE. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995, 10:295-302.
16. Motosch N. Development of design charts for bolts preloaded up to the plastic range. J Eng Ind 1976, 98:849-851.
17. Jorneus L, Jemt T, Carlsson L. Loads and designs of screw joints for a single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992, 7:353-359.
18. Robb TT, Porter SS. Increasing implant-abutment preload by thin gold coating abutment screws [abstract 1642]. J Dent Res 1998, 77:837.
19. Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2001, 86:24-32.
20. Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000, 15:519-526.
21. Burguete RL, Johns RB, King T. Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1994, 71:592-599.
22. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000, 11(Suppl 1):156-158.
23. Balfour A, O'Brien GR. Comparative study of antirotational single tooth abutment. J Prothet Dent 1995, 73:36-43.
24. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength for an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997, 8:290-298.
25. Hansson S. A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stresses in the supporting bone. An axisymmetric finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003, 14:286-293.
26. Hansson S. Implant-abutment interface: biomechanical study of flat top versus conical. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000, 2:33-41.
27. Drago CJ. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impants 2003, 18:273-278.
28. Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: progress report from a multicenter prospective study after 3 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994, 9:49-54.
29. Becker W, Becker BE. Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1995, 74:51-55.