Quantifying uncertainty in applying importance-performance analysis

Quality and Quantity

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 997-1003

  Wu, Hsin Hung ^a   Shieh, Jiunn I ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHANGHUA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

^b ASIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Importance performance analysis; Measurement; Sampling; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955173302     PISSN: 00335177     EISSN: 15737845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-009-9245-8     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Black T. R.: Doing Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences: an Integrated Approach to Research Design, Measurement and Statistics. Sage Publications, London (1999).
2. Ellison S. L. R., Rosslein M., Williams A.: EURACHEM/CITAC Guide: quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. 2nd edn. Laboratory of the Government Chemist, London (2000).
3. Fotowicz P.: Method for calculating the coverage factor in calibration. OIML Bull. 43(4), 5-9 (2002).
4. Fotowicz P.: A method of approximation of the coverage factor in calibration. Measurement 35(3), 251-256 (2004).
5. Graf L. A., Hemmasi M., Nielsen W.: Importance-satisfaction analysis: a diagnostic tool for organizational change. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 136, 8-12 (1992).
6. Kirkup L.: A guide to GUM. Eur. J. Phys. 23(5), 483-487 (2002).
7. Magal, S. R., Levenburg, N. M.: Using importance-performance analysis to evaluate e-business strategies among small businesses. In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 176 (2005).
8. Martilla J. A., James J. C.: Importance-performance analysis. J. Mark. 41(1), 77-79 (1977).
9. Shieh J.-I., Wu H.-H.: Applying importance-performance analysis to compare the changes of a convenient store. Qual. Quant. 43(3), 391-400 (2009). doi: 10. 1007/s11135-007-9111-5.
10. Skok W., Kophamel A., Richardson I.: Diagnosing information systems success: importance-performance maps in the health club industry. Inf. Manage. 38, 409-419 (2001).
11. Turzeniecka D.: Errors in the evaluation of the coverage factor as a criterion of applications of approximate methods of evaluation of expanded uncertainty. Measurement 27(4), 223-229 (2000).