Effect of processing variables on quality of milk burfiprepared with and without sugar

Journal of Food Science and Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 114-118

  Chetana, R ^a   Ravi, R ^a   Reddy, Yella S ^a  

^a CENTRAL FOOD TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Milk burfi; Sorbitol; Sugar; Sweetener

Indexed keywords

BREAKING STRENGTH; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; MILK BURFI; OPTIMUM CONDITIONS; OVERALL ACCEPTABILITY; PROCESSING CONDITION; PROCESSING VARIABLES; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SENSORY QUALITIES; SIMULTANEOUS OPTIMIZATION; STORAGE PERIODS; TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS;

ALCOHOLS; ESTERS; TEXTURES;

SUGAR (SUCROSE);

EID: 77955117949     PISSN: 00221155     EISSN: 09758402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-010-0005-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Amerine AM, Pangborn RM, Roessler BE (1965) Principles of sensory evaluation of food. Academic Press Inc, New York, p 356-358
2. AOAC (2005) Official methods of analysis. 18th edn, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Maryland, USA
3. Arora S, Singh VP, Sharma V, Wadhwa BK, George V, Singh AK, Sharma GS (2009) Analysis of sucralose and its storage stability in burfi . J Food Sci Technol 46:114-117
4. Arora S, Singh VP, Yarrakula S, Gawande H, Narendra K, Sharma V, Wadhwa BK, Tomer SK, Sharma GS (2007) Textural and microstructural properties of burfi made with various sweeteners. J Text Stud 38:684-697
5. Box GEP, Wilson KG (1951) On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J Royal Statistics Soc 13:1-45
6. Bunting C (1994) Sugar-free ingredient-a review. Manuf Conf 74(10):55-58
7. Dasappa I, Venkateshwara Rao G. (2001) Optimization of the quality of South Indian parotta by modeling the ingredients and composition during response surface methodology. Int J Food Sci Technol 36:189-197
8. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214-219
9. FDA (1993) Office of the Federal Register, General Services Administration. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Section 184.1835, Washington DC
10. ISI (1970) IS:5550. Specification for burfi , Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
11. Kissel LT, Marshall BD (1967) Multifactor responses of cake quality to basic ingredients ratio. Cereal Chem 39:16-30
12. Macdonald TA, Bly DA (1966) Determination of optimum levels of several emulsifiers in cake mix shortenings. Cereal Chem 43:571-584
13. Montgomery DC (1997) Introduction to statistical quality control. 3rd edn, John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 512-572
14. Ozdemir M, Sadikoglu H (1998) Characterization of rheological properties of systems containing sugar substitutes and carageenan. Int J Food Sci Technol 33:439-444
15. PFA (2004) Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1955. Amended 25 June 2004, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt of India, Nr 273, Part II, Section 3(1)
16. Sachdeva S, Rajorhia GS (1982) Technology and shelf life of Burfi . Indian J Dairy Sci 35:513-518
17. Sarkar K, Ray PR, Ghatak PK (2002) Effect of sodium and potassium metabisulphites on the shelf life of cow milk burfi . Indian J Dairy Sci 55:79-82
18. Saxena DC, Rao PH (1986) Optimization of ingredients and process conditions for the preparation of Indian roti using response surface methodology. Int J Food Sci Technol 31: 345-351