The influence of liking for antismoking psas on adolescents' smoking-related behavioral intentions

Health Communication

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 459-469

  Nan, Xiaoli ^a   Zhao, Xiaoquan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; SMOKING CESSATION; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; CHILD; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; SMOKING CESSATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77955100028     PISSN: 10410236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2010.484877     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intention to action: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Allison, P. D. (1999). Logistic regression using the SAS system: Theory and application. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
3. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (1998). Standard def- initions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for RDD telephone surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: AAPOR.
4. Andreasen, A. R. (2006). Social marketing in the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Andsager, J. L., Austin, E. W., & Pinkleton, B. E. (2001). Questioning the value of realism: Young adults' processing of messages in alcohol- related public service announcements and advertising. Journal of Communication, 51, 121-142.
6. Batra, R., & Ray, M. L. (1986). Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 234-249.
7. Brandon, T., & Baker, T. (1991). The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire: The subjective expected utility of smoking in college students. Psychological Assessment, 3, 484-491.
8. Brown, S. P., & Stayman, D. M. (1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19,34-51.
9. Burns, D. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2001). Overview of recent changes in adolescent smoking behavior. In D. M. Burns (Ed.), Changing adoles- cent smoking prevalence (Monograph 14) (pp. 1-8). Bethesda, MD: U.S.
10. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health, National Cancer Institute.
11. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252), New York: Guilford.
12. Copeland, A. L., Brandon, T., & Quinn, E. (1995). The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire-Adult: Measurement of smoking outcome expectancies of experienced smokers. Psychological Assessment, 7, 484-494.
13. DeBono, K. G., & McDermott, J. B. (1994). Trait anxiety and persuasion: Individual differences in information processing strategies. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 395-407.
14. Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and persuasion: Emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27,461-495.
15. Dröge, C. (1989). Shaping the route to attitude change: Central ver- sus peripheral processing through comparative versus noncomparative advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 193-204.
16. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual dif- ferences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390-405.
17. Farrelly, M. C., Healton, C. G., Davis, K. C., Messeri, P., Hersey, J. C., & Haviland, M. L. (2002). Getting to the truth: Evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 901-907.
18. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2003). Judgment and deci- sion making: The dance of affect and reason. In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (pp. 327-364). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Fishbein, M. (2000). The role of theory in HIV prevention. AIDS Care, 12, 273-278.
21. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Freeman, M. A., Hennessy, E. V., & Marzullo, D. M. (2001). Defensive evaluation of antismoking messages among college-age smokers: The role of possible selves. Health Psychology, 20, 424-433.
23. Gardner, M.P.(1985).Does attitude toward the ad affect brand attitude under a brand evaluation set? Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 192-198.
24. Haley, R. I., & Baldinger, A. L. (1991). The ARF Copy Research Validity Project. Journal of Advertising Research, 31, 11-32.
25. Hass, R. G., Katz, I., Rizzo, N., Bailey, J., & Moore, L. (1992). When racial ambivalence evokes negative affect, using a disguised measure of mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 786-797.
26. Kelly, K. J., Slater, M. D., & Karan, D. (2002). Image advertisements' influ- ence on adolescents' perceptions of the desirability of beer and cigarettes. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 2, 295-304.
27. Kotler, P., Roberto, E., & Lee, N. (2002). Social marketing: Improving the quality of life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Limon, M. S., & Kazoleas, D. C. (2004). A comparison of exemplar and statistical evidence in reducing counter-arguments and responses to a message. Communication Research Reports, 21, 291-298.
29. Lipkus, I. M., Green, L. G., Feaganes, J. R., & Sedikides, C. (2001). The relationship between attitudinal ambivalence and desire to quit smoking among college smokers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 113-133.
30. Lipkus, I. M., Pollak, K. I., McBride, C. M., Schwartz-Bloom, R., Lyna, P., & Bloom, P. N. (2005). Assessing attitudinal ambivalence towards smoking and its association with desire to quite among teen smokers. Psychology & Health, 20, 373-387.
31. Lutz, R. (1985). Antecedents of attitude toward the ad: A conceptual frame- work. In L. F. Alwitt & A. A. Michell (Eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects: Theory, research, and application (pp. 45-63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53, 48-65.
33. MacKenzie, S. B., & Spreng, R. A. (1992). How does motivation moderate the impact of central and peripheral processing on brand attitudes and intentions? Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 519-529.
34. MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of atti- tude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 130-143.
35. Maio, G. R., Bell, D. W., & Esses, V. M. (1996). Ambivalence and per- suasion: The processing of messages about immigrant groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 513-536.
36. Maio, G. R., Esses, V. M., & Bell, D. W. (2000). Examining conflict between components of attitudes: Ambivalence and inconsistency are distinct constructs. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 32, 71-83.
37. McGuire, W. J. (2001). Input and output variables currently promising for constructing persuasive communications. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (pp. 22-48). London: Sage.
38. Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 318-332.
39. Mobility and Mortality Weekly Report. (2008). Cigarette use among high school students-United States, 1991-2007. 57, 689-691.
40. Muehling, D. D., & Laczniak, R. N. (1988). Advertising's immediate and delayed influence on brand attitudes: Considerations across message- involvement levels. Journal of Advertising, 17, 23-34.
41. Muehling, D. D., & McCann, M. (1993). Attitude toward the ad: A review. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 15, 25-58.
42. Nan, X. (2008). The influence of liking for a public service announcement on issue attitude. Communication Research, 35, 503-528.
43. Niederdeppe, J. D. (2005). Syntactic indeterminacy, perceived message sensation value-enhancing features, and message processing in the context of anti-tobacco advertisements, Communication Monographs, 72, 324-344.
44. Nordgren, L. F., van Harreveld, F., & van der Pligt, J. (2006). Ambivalence, discomfort, and motivated information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 252-258.
45. O'Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. O'Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, Evidence, and data analysis in exper- imental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13, 251-274.
47. Palmgreen, P., Donohew, L., Lorch, E. P., Hoyle, R. H., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Television campaigns and sensation seek- ing targeting of adolescent marijuana use: A controlled time series approach. In R. C. Hornik (Ed.), Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change (pp. 35-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Park, C. Whan, & Young, S. M. (1986). Consumer response to television commercials: The impact of involvement and background music on brand attitude formation. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 11-24.
49. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer- Verlag.
50. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
51. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. T. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135-146.
52. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 41-72). New York: Guilford.
53. Pierce, J. P., Distefan, J. M., Kaplan, R. M., & Gilpin, E. A. (2005). The role of curiosity in smoking initiation. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 685-696.
54. Rimer, B. K., & Kreuter, M. W. (2006). Advancing tailored health com- munication: A persuasion and message effects perspective. Journal of Communication, 56, s184-s201.
55. Shimp, T. A. (1981), Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. Journal of Advertising, 10, 9-15.
56. Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (1996). Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. Communication Research, 23, 210-235.
57. Slater, M. D. (1996). Theory and method in health audience segmentation. Journal of Health Communication, 1, 267-283.
58. Slater, M. D. (2006). Specification and misspecification of theoretical foun- dations and logic models for health communication campaigns. Health Communication, 20, 149-157.
59. Slovic, P. (2001). Cigarette smokers: Rational actors or rational fools. In P. Slovic (Ed.), Smoking: Risk, perception, & policy (pp. 97-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Snyder, L. B., & Hamilton. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of U.S. health cam- paign effects on behavior: Emphasize enforcement, exposure, and new information, and beware the secular trend. In R. C. Hornik (Ed.), Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change (pp. 357-383). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Stephenson, M. T. (2003). Examining adolescents' responses to antimari- juana PSAs. Human Communication Research, 29, 343-369.
62. Stephenson, M. T., & Palmgreen, P. (2001). Sensation seeking, perceived message sensation value, personal involvement, and processing of anti- marijuana PSAs. Communication Monographs, 68, 49-71.
63. Wise, K., Bolls, P. D., Kim, H., Venkataraman, A., & Meyer, R. (2008). Enjoyment of advergames and brand attitudes: The impact of thematic relevance. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 9, 14-29.
64. Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 798-810.
65. Wood, W., & Kallgren, C. A. (1988). Communicator attributes and per- suasion: Recipients' access to attitude-relevant information in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 172-182.
66. Zhao, X., & Cai, X. (2008). The role of ambivalence in college nonsmok- ers' information seeking and information processing. Communication Research, 35, 298-318.
67. Zhao, X., & Cai, X. (2009). Ambivalence amplifies college smokers' neg- ative emotional responses to anti-smoking information. Communication Studies, 60, 288-304.