Water relations advantages for invasive Rubus armeniacus over two native ruderal congeners

Plant Ecology

Volumn 210, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 169-179

  Caplan, Joshua S ^a,b   Yeakley, J Alan ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological invasion; Ecophysiology; Pacific Northwest; Plant invasiveness; Rubus discolor; Rubus procerus

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DICOTYLEDON; ECOPHYSIOLOGY; GROWING SEASON; GROWTH RATE; INVASIBILITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; RUDERAL; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TIME SERIES; WATER AVAILABILITY; WATER USE;

OREGON; PACIFIC OCEAN; PACIFIC OCEAN (NORTHWEST); PORTLAND [OREGON]; UNITED STATES;

RUBUS; RUBUS ARMENIACUS; RUBUS DISCOLOR; RUBUS FRUTICOSUS; RUBUS MOLUCCANUS; RUBUS SPECTABILIS;

EID: 77955094578     PISSN: 13850237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-010-9747-4     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Amor RL (1974) Ecology and control of blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.) II: reproduction. Weed Res 14: 231-238.
2. Amor RL, Stevens PL (1976) Spread of weeds from a roadside into sclerophyll forests at Dartmouth, Australia. Weed Res 16: 111-118.
3. Amor RL, Richardson RG, Pritchard GH, Bruzzese E (1998) Rubus fruticosus L. agg. In: Panetta FD, Groves RH, Shepherd RCH (eds) The biology of Australian weeds, vol 2. RG and FJ Richardson, Melbourne, Australia, pp 225-246.
4. Anderson VJ, Briske DD (1990) Stomatal distribution, density and conductance of three perennial grasses native to the southern true prairie of Texas. Am Midl Nat 123: 152-159.
5. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 57: 289-300.
6. Boyer JS (1995) Measuring the water status of plants and soils. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
7. Broshot NE (2007) The influence of urbanization on forest stand dynamics in Northwestern Oregon. Urban Ecosyst 10: 285-298.
8. Bruzzese E (1998) The biology of blackberry in south-eastern Australia. Plant Prot Q 13: 160-162.
9. Caplan JS (2009) The role of water and other resources in the invasion of Rubus armeniacus in Pacific Northwest ecosystems. Dissertation, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
10. Caplan JS, Yeakley JA (2006) Rubus armeniacus (Himalayan blackberry) occurrence and growth in relation to soil and light conditions in western Oregon. Northwest Sci 80: 9-17.
11. Choné X, van Leeuwen C, Dubourdieu D, Gaudillère JP (2001) Stem water potential is a sensitive indicator of grapevine water status. Ann Bot 87: 477-483.
12. Cordell S, Cabin RJ, Hadway LJ (2002) Physiological ecology of native and alien dry forest shrubs in Hawaii. Biol Invasions 4: 387-396.
13. Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34: 183-211.
14. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88: 528-534.
15. Deng X, Ye WH, Feng HL, Yang QH, Cao HL, Hui KY, Zhang Y (2004) Gas exchange characteristics of the invasive species Mikania micrantha and its indigenous congener M. cordata (Asteraceae) in South China. Bot Bull Acad Sin 45: 213-220.
16. Donovan LA, Richards JH, Linton MJ (2003) Magnitude and mechanisms of disequilibrium between predawn plant and soil water potentials. Ecology 84: 463-470.
17. Eggemeyer KD, Awada T, Wedin DA, Harvey FE, Zhou X (2006) Ecophysiology of two native invasive woody species and two dominant warm-season grasses in the semiarid grasslands of the Nebraska Sandhills. Int J Plant Sci 167: 991-999.
18. Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6: 503-523.
19. Fell KR, Rowson JM (1957) Anatomical studies in the genus Rubus. II. The anatomy of the leaf of R. fructicosus L. J Pharm Pharmacol 9: 293-311.
20. Fierke MK, Kauffman JB (2006) Invasive species influence riparian plant diversity along a successional gradient, Willamette River, Oregon. Nat Areas J 26: 376-382.
21. 13C composition. New Phytol 151: 427.
22. Funk JL, Vitousek PM (2007) Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature 446: 1079-1081.
23. Gray AN (2005) Eight nonnative plants in western Oregon forests: associations with environment and management. Environ Monit Assess 100: 109-127.
24. Groves RH (1998) Towards an integrated management system for blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.): introduction. Plant Prot Q 3: 151-152.
25. Hoshovsky MC (2000) Rubus discolor Weihe & Nees. In: Bossard CC, Randall JM, Hoshovsky MC (eds) Invasive plants of California's wildlands. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA, pp 277-281.
26. Jarvis PG (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philos Trans R Soc B 273: 593-610.
27. Jennings DL (1988) Raspberries and blackberries: their breeding, diseases, and growth. Academic Press, London.
28. Jones H (1998) Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. J Exp Bot 49: 387-398.
29. Kloeppel BD, Abrams MD (1995) Ecophysiological attributes of the native Acer saccharum and the exotic Acer platanoides in urban oak forests in Pennsylvania, USA. Tree Physiol 15: 739-746.
30. Kolb KJ, Davis SD (1994) Drought tolerance and xylem embolism in co-occurring species of coastal sage and chaparral. Ecology 75: 648-659.
31. Kramer PJ, Boyer JS (1995) Water relations of plants and soils. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
32. Law BE, Waring RH (1994) Combining remote sensing and climatic data to estimate net primary production across Oregon. Ecol Appl 4: 717-728.
33. Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stress. II. Water, radiation, salt, and other stresses. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
34. McDowell SCL (2002) Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus (Rosaceae). Am J Bot 89: 1431-1438.
35. McDowell SCL, Turner DP (2002) Reproductive effort in invasive and noninvasive Rubus. Oecologia 133: 102-111.
36. Nagel JM, Griffin KL (2004) Can gas-exchange characteristics help explain the invasive success of Lythrum salicaria? Biol Invasions 6: 101-111.
37. Nardini A, Salleo S, Trifilo P, Lo Gullo MA (2003) Water relations and hydraulic characteristics of three woody species co-occurring in the same habitat. Ann For Sci 60: 297-305.
38. Nilsen ET, Sharifi MR, Rundel PW, Jarrell WM, Virginia RA (1983) Diurnal and seasonal water relations of the desert phreatophyte Prosopis glandulosa (honey mesquite) in the Sonoran Desert of California. Ecology 64: 1381-1393.
39. Ohmann JL, Spies TA (1998) Regional gradient analysis and spatial pattern of woody plant communities of Oregon forests. Ecol Monogr 68: 151-182.
40. Oleskevich C, Shamoun SF, Punja ZK (1996) The biology of Canadian weeds. 105. Rubus strigosus Michx., Rubus parviflorus Nutt., and Rubus spectabilis Pursh. Can J Plant Sci 76: 187-201.
41. Pearcy RW, Schulze ED, Zimmermann R (1991) Measurement of transpiration and leaf conductance. In: Pearcy RW, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Rundel PW (eds) Plant physiological ecology: field methods and instrumentation. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp 137-160.
42. Pennycook SR (1998) Blackberry in New Zealand. Plant Prot Q 13: 163-174.
43. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
44. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77: 1655-1661.
45. Ringold PL, Magee TK, Peck DV (2008) Twelve invasive plant taxa in US western riparian ecosystems. J Am Benth Soc 27: 949-966.
46. Stafne ET, Clark JR, Rom CR (2001) Leaf gas exchange response of 'Arapaho' blackberry and six red raspberry cultivars to moderate and high temperatures. Hortscience 36: 880-883.
47. Stephenson NL (1990) Climatic control of vegetation distribution: the role of water balance. Am Nat 135: 649-670.
48. Tyree MT, Ewers FW (1991) Tansley Review No. 34. The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytol 119: 345-360.
49. van den Honert TH (1948) Water transport in plants as a catenary process. Discuss Faraday Soc 3: 146-153.
50. Wagner W, Pruss A (1993) International equations for the saturation properties of ordinary water substance. Revised according to the international temperature scale of 1990. J Phys Chem Ref Data 22: 783-787.
51. Waring RH, Franklin JF (1979) Evergreen coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest. Science 204: 1380-1386.
52. Wullschleger SD, Meinzer FC, Vertessy RA (1998) A review of whole-plant water use studies in trees. Tree Physiol 18: 499-512.
53. Zeiger E (1983) The biology of stomatal guard cells. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 34: 441-474.