Evaluation of DNA damage and cytotoxicity of polyurethane-based nano- And microparticles as promising biomaterials for drug delivery systems

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1655-1665

  Caon, Thiago ^a   Zanetti Ramos, Betina Giehl ^a   Lemos Senna, Elenara ^a   Cloutet, Eric ^b   Cramail, Henri ^b   Borsali, Redouane ^b   Soldi, Valdir ^a   Simões, Claúdia Maria Oliveira ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITÉ BORDEAUX 1   (France)

Author keywords

Comet assay; Cytotoxicity; DNA damage; MTT assay; Nanomedicine; Polyurethane particles; Safety

Indexed keywords

COMET ASSAY; COMET ASSAYS; DNA DAMAGES; MTT ASSAYS; NANOMEDICINES; POLYURETHANE PARTICLES;

ANIONIC SURFACTANTS; ASSAYS; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMATERIALS; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; DNA; DRUG DELIVERY; DYES; GENES; MEDICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOPARTICLES; SODIUM; SODIUM SULFATE;

CYTOTOXICITY;

BIOMATERIAL; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; NANOPARTICLE; POLOXAMER; POLYSORBATE 80; POLYURETHAN; SURFACTANT;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL GROWTH; CELL VIABILITY; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMET ASSAY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; DNA DAMAGE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; EMULSION; FIBROBLAST; GENOTOXICITY; GROWTH INHIBITION; MEASUREMENT; NANOMEDICINE; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE CHARGE; VERO CELL;

EID: 77955086453     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-009-9828-2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andriguetti-Fröhner CR, Antonio RV, Creczynski-Pasa TB et al (2003) Cytotoxicity and potential antiviral of violacein produced by Chromobacterium violaceum. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 98:843-848. doi:10.1590/S0074-0276200 3000600023
2. Do Luu HM, Hutter JC (2000) Pharmacokinetic modeling of 4, 4′-methylenedianiline released from reused polyurethane dialyzer potting materials. J Biomed Mater Res 53:276-286. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53: 3<276:AIDJBM13>3.0.CO;2-E
3. Durrieu V, Gandini A, Belgacem MN et al (2004) Preparation of aqueous anionic poly-(urethane-urea) dispersions: influence of the nature and proportion of the urethane groups on the dispersion and polymer properties. J Appl Polym Sci 94:700-710
4. Fontana G, Licciardi M, Mansueto S et al (2001) Amoxicilinloaded polyethylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles: influence of PEG coating on the particle size, drug release rate and phagocytic uptake. Biomaterials 22:2857-2865. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00030-8 (Pubitemid 32739242)
5. Gref R, Domb A, Quellec P et al (1995) The controlled intravenous delivery of drugs using PEG-coated sterically stabilized nanospheres. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 16:215-233. doi:10.1016/0169-409X(95)00026-4
6. Harush-Frenkel O, Debotton N, Benita S et al (2007) Targeting of nanoparticles to the clathrin-mediated endocytic pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 353:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.11.135 (Pubitemid 44958337)
7. Horak D, Cervinka M, Puza V (1997) Hydrogels in endovascular embolization VI Toxicity tests of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) particles on cell cultures. Biomaterials 18:1355-1359. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00059-8 (Pubitemid 27460142)
8. Jiang J, Oberdörster G, Biswas P (2008) Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. J Nanopart Res 11:77-89. doi:10.1007/s11051-008-9446-4
9. Kim HW, Ahh EK, Jee BK et al (2009) Nanoparticulateinduced toxicity and related mechanism in vitro and in vivo. J Nanopart Res 11:55-65. doi:10.1007/s11051-008-9447-9453
10. Kobayashi H, Sugiyama C, Morikawa Y et al (1995) A comparison between manual microscopic analysis and computerized image analysis in the single cell gel electrophoresis assay. MMS Commun 3:103-115
11. Lelah MD, Cooper SL (1986) Polyurethanes in medicine. CRC Press, Boca Raton
12. Lewinski N, Colvin V, Drezek R (2008) Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Small 4:26-49. doi:10.1002/smll.200700595 (Pubitemid 351205731)
13. Michel R, Pasche S, Textor M et al (2005) Influence of PEG architecture on protein adsorption and conformation. Langmuir 21:12327-12332. doi:10.1021/la051726h (Pubitemid 43037200)
14. Midander K, Cronholm P, Karlsson HL et al (2009) Surface characteristics, copper release, and toxicity of nano- and micrometer-sized copper and copper(II) oxide particles: across-disciplinary study. Small 5:389-399. doi:10.1002/ smll.200801220
15. Mossmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55-63
16. Myamae Y, Yamamoto M, Sasaki YF et al (1998) Evaluation of a tissue homogenization that isolates nuclein for the in vivo single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay: a collaborative study by five laboratories. Mutat Res 418:131-140
17. Papageorgiou I, Brown C, Schins R et al (2007) The effect of nano- and micron-sized particles of cobalt-chromium alloy on human fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials 28:2946-2958. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.034 (Pubitemid 46578251)
18. Sekihashi K, Saitoh H, Saga A (2003) Effect of in vitro exposure time on comet assay results. Environ Mutagen Res 25:83-86
19. Sieuwerts A, Klijn JGM, Peters HA et al (1995) The MTT tetrazolium salt assay scrutinized: how to use this assay reliably to measure metabolic activity of cell cultures in vitro for the assessment of growth characteristics, IC50- values and cell survival. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 33:813-823. doi:0099-2240/99/$04.0010
20. Simões SI, Tapadas JM, Marques CM et al (2005) Permeabilization and solubilization of soybean phosphatidylcholine bilayer vesicles, as membrane models, by polysorbate Tween 80. Eur J Pharm Sci 26:307-317
21. Spiekstra SW, Dos Santos GG, Scheper RJ et al (2009) Potential method to determine irritant potency in vitro-comparison of two reconstructed epidermal culturemodels with different barrier competency. Toxicol In Vitro 23:349-355. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2008.12.010
22. Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D et al (2000) Single cell gel/ Comet assay: guidelines for in vitro genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen 35:206-221
23. Verma A, Uzun O, HuYet al (2008) Surface-structure-regulated cell-membrane penetration by monolayer-protected nanoparticles. Nat Mater 7:588-595. doi:10.1038/nmat2202
24. Walum E, Strenberg K, Jenssen D (1990) Understanding cell toxicology: principles and practice. Ellis Howood, New York
25. Yao C, Acosta D (1992) Surfactant cytotoxicity potential evaluated with primary cultures of ocular tissues: a method for the culture of rabbit conjunctival epithelial cells and initial cytotoxicity studies. Toxicol Mech Methods 2:199-218. doi:10.3109/15376519209066106
26. Yin H, Too HP, Chow GM (2005) The effects of particle size and surface coating on the cytotoxicity of nickel ferrite. Biomaterials 26:5818-5826. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials. 2005.02.036
27. Zanetti-Ramos BG, Soldi V, Lemos-Senna E et al (2005) Use of natural monomer in the synthesis of nano- and microparticles of polyurethane by suspension-polyaddition technique. Macromol Symp 229:234-245. doi:10.1002/masy. 200551129
28. Zanetti-Ramos BG, Lemos-Senna E, Soldi V et al (2006) Polyurethane nanoparticles from a natural polyol via miniemulsion technique. Polymer 47:8080-8087. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2007.04.041