Accessibility appraisal of land-use/transport policy strategies: More than just adding up travel-time savings

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 382-393

  Geurs, Karst ^a   Zondag, Barry ^b   de Jong, Gerard ^c,d,e,f   de Bok, Michiel ^c,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^c Significance BV   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^e NEA   (Netherlands)

^f ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Land use policies; Logsum accessibility benefits; Travel time savings

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMICS; INVESTMENTS; LAND USE; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; TRAVEL TIME;

ACCESSIBILITY MEASURES; INTERACTION MODEL; INVESTMENT PROGRAMMES; LAND USE POLICY; LOGSUM ACCESSIBILITY BENEFITS; POLICY STRATEGIES; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS; TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS;

TRANSPORTATION;

ACCESSIBILITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; LAND USE PLANNING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; ROAD TRANSPORT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL DEMAND; TRAVEL TIME;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 77955053758     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anas A. Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models. Transportation Research Part B 1983, 17:13-23.
2. Bates J. Economic evaluation and transport modelling: theory and practice. Moving Through Nets: The Physical and Social Dimensions of Travel 2006, Pergamon, Oxford. K. Axhausen (Ed.).
3. CPB/MNP/RPB Welvaart en leefomgeving (Prosperity and Living Environment Study) 2006, Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis/Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency/Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research, The Hague/Bilthoven.
4. Daly, A.J., 2008. The relationship of costs sensitivity and trip length. In: European Transport Conference, Leiden.
5. Daly, A.J., de Jong, G.C., Ibáñez, N., Batley, R, de Bok, M., 2008. Welfare measures from discrete choice models in the presence of income effect. In: European Transport Conference, Leiden.
6. de Jong G., Daly A., Pieters M., van der Hoorn T. The logsum as an evaluation measure: review of the literature and new results. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2007, 41:874-889.
7. Department for Transport Transport, Wider Economic Benefits, and Impacts on GDP 2005, DfT, London.
8. Geurs K.T., Wee B., van Rietveld P. Accessibility appraisal of integrated land-use/transport strategies: methodology and case study for the Netherlands Randstad area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2006, 33:639-660.
9. Gupta S., Kalmanje S., Kockelman K.M. Road pricing simulations: traffic, land use and welfare impacts for Austin, Texas. Transportation Planning and Technology 2006, 29:1-23.
10. Hensher D.A. Climate change, enhanced greenhouse gas emissions and passenger transport - what can we do to make a difference?. Transportation Research Part D 2008, 13:95-111.
11. Hilferink M., Rietveld P. Land use scanner: an integrated GIS based model for long term projections of land use in urban and rural areas. Journal of Geographical Systems 1999, 1:155-177.
12. Koomen E., Loonen W., Hilferink M. Climate-change adaptations in land-use planning: a scenario-based approach. The European Information Society: Taking Geoinformation Science One Step Further 2008, Springer, Berlin. L. Bernard (Ed.).
13. Martínez F.J., Araya C. A note on trip benefits in spatial interaction models. Journal of Regional Science 2000, 40:789-796.
14. McFadden D. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data: With Econometric Applications 1981, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C. Manski, D. McFadden (Eds.).
15. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, 2006. Nota Mobiliteit. Naar een betrouwbare en voorspelbare bereikbaarheid. PKB deel IV [Mobility Policy Document. Towards reliable and predictable accessibility. Part IV]. The Hague.
16. MNP Nederland Later. Tweede Duurzaamheidsverkenning [The Netherlands in the Future. The 2nd Sustainability Outlook] 2007, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven.
17. Morey E.R., Sharma V.R., Karlström A. A simple method of incorporating income effects into logit and nested-logit models: theory and application. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2003, 85:248-253.
18. Neuburger H. User benefits in the evaluation of transport and land-use plans. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1971, 5:52-75.
19. Niemeier D.A. Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare. Transportation 1997, 24:377-396.
20. RAND Europe TIGRIS XL 1.0 - Documentatie 2006, RAND Europe, Leiden.
21. SACTRA Transport and the Economy. The Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment 1999, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
22. Srour, I.M., Kockelman, K.M., 2001. Accessibility indices: a connection to residential land prices and location choices. In: 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
23. Waddell P., Ulfarsson G.F., Franklin J.P., Lobb J. Incorporating land use in metropolitan transportation planning. Transportation Research Part A 2007, 41:382-410.
24. Zondag, B., 2007. Joint Modeling of Land-use, Transport and Economy. Ph.D. Thesis. Delft University, Delft.
25. Zondag, B., de Jong, G., 2005. The development of the TIGRIS XL model: a bottom-up approach to transport, land-use and the economy. Paper presented at the conference on Economics Impacts of Changing Accessibility, Edinburgh.