A novel approach based on distinction of actual and pseudo resistances in membrane fouling: " Pseudo resistance" concept and its implementation in nanofiltration of single solutions

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 361, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 96-112

  Aydiner, Coskun ^a  

^a GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Actual resistance; Flux decline; Membrane fouling; Modeling; Nanofiltration; Pseudo resistance

Indexed keywords

ANIONIC SURFACTANTS; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CONTACT ANGLE; MEMBRANE FOULING; MODELS; NANOFILTRATION; OSMOSIS; POLARIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; FLUX DECLINE; GEL CONCENTRATION; INTEGRATED MODELING APPROACHES; LINEAR ALKYL BENZENE; MASS TRANSPORT MODEL; MEMBRANE RESISTANCE; NANOPOROUS MEMBRANE;

MEMBRANES;

ALKYLBENZENESULFONIC ACID; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TARTRAZINE;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CONTACT ANGLE; DYNAMICS; FOULING PREVENTION; GEL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; NANOANALYSIS; NANOFILTRATION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; POLARIZATION; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SURFACE PROPERTY; THICKNESS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 77955050632     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Hoek E.M.V., Allred J., Knoell T., Jeong B.H. Modeling the effects of fouling on full-scale reverse osmosis processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 314:33-49.
2. Tu S.C., Ravindran V., Pirbazari M. A pore diffusion transport model for forecasting the performance of membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 265:29-50.
3. Van der Bruggen B., Manttari M., Nystrom M. Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:251-263.
4. McKetta J.J. Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design 1997, vol. 59. Marcel Dekker, Inc.
5. Hwang K.J., Liao C.Y., Tung K.L. Analysis of particle fouling during microfiltration by use of blocking models. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 287:287-293.
6. Liu Q.F., Kim S.H. Evaluation of membrane fouling models based on bench-scale experiments: a comparison between constant flowrate blocking laws and artificial neural network (ANNs) model. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 310:393-401.
7. Chmiel H., Lefebvre X., Mavrov V., Noronha M., Palmeri J. Computer simulation of nanofiltration, membranes and processes. Handbook of Theoretical and Computational Nanotechnology 2006, vol. 5. American Scientific Publishers.
8. Braeken L., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Flux decline in nanofiltration due to adsorption of dissolved organic compounds: model prediction of time dependency. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110:2957-2962.
9. Chaabane T., Taha S., Ahmed M.T., Maachi R., Dorange G. Coupled model of film theory and the Nernst-Planck equation in nanofiltration. Desalination 2007, 206:424-432.
10. Kanani D.M., Ghosh R. A constant flux based mathematical model for predicting permeate flux decline in constant pressure protein ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 290:207-215.
11. Bader M.S.H. Nanofiltration for oil-fields water injection operations: analysis of concentration polarization. Desalination 2006, 201:106-113.
12. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology 1991, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Bhatia S., DasGupta S., De S. Performance prediction of membrane modules incorporating the effects of suction in the mass transfer coefficient under turbulent flow conditions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 55:182-190.
14. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook 1998, Technomic Publishing Company.
15. Cheng T.W., Yeh H.M., Gau C.T. Flux analysis by modified osmotic-pressure model for laminar ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1998, 13:1-8.
16. Mohammad A.W., Hilal N., Al-Zoubi H., Darwish N.A. Prediction of permeate fluxes and rejections of highly concentrated salts in nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 289:40-50.
17. Elimelech M., Bhattacharjee S. A novel approach for modeling concentration polarization in crossflow membrane filtration based on the equivalence of osmotic pressure model and filtration theory. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 145:223-241.
18. Wijmans J.G., Nakao S., van den Berg J.W.A., Troelstra F.R., Smolders C.A. Hydrodynamic resistance of concentration polarization boundary layers in ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1985, 22:117-135.
19. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration-critical assessment and model development. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:1121-1137.
20. Churaev N.V. Thin liquid layers. Colloid J. (English Translation) 1996, 58(6):681-693.
21. Bowen W.R., Yousef H.N.S. Effect of salts on water viscosity in narrow membrane pores. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 264:452-457.
22. Hall M.S., Starov V.M., Lloyd D.R. Reverse osmosis of multicomponent electrolyte solutions: Part I. Theoretical development. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 128:23-37.
23. Grahame D.C. Effects of dielectric saturation upon the diffuse double layer and the free energy of hydration of ions. J. Chem. Phys. 1950, 18(7):903-909.
24. Basu S., Sharma M.M. An improved space-charge model for flow through charged microporous membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 124:77-91.
25. Lyklema J. Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science, Solid-Liquid Interfaces 1995, vol. II. Academic Press.
26. Israelachvili J.N. Measurement of the viscosity of liquids in very thin layers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1986, 110:263-271.
27. Gee M.L., McGuiggan P.M., Israelachvili J.N., Homola A.M. Liquid to solid-like transitions of molecularly thin films under shear. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93:1895-1906.
28. Samuel de Lint W.B., Zivkovic T., Benes N.E., Bouwmeester H.J.M., Blank D.H.A. Electrolyte retention of supported bi-layered nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 277:18-27.
29. Zhao Y., Taylor J.S., Chellam S. Predicting RO/NF water quality by modified solution diffusion model and artificial neural networks. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 263:38-46.
30. Tu S.C., Ravindran V., Den W., Pirbazari M. Predictive membrane transport model for nanofiltration processes in water treatment. AIChE J. 2001, 47(6):1346-1362.
31. Wang X.M., Waite T.D. Impact of gel layer formation on colloid retention in membrane filtration processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:486-494.
32. Hoek E.M.V., Elimelech M. Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:5581-5588.
33. Rautenbach R., Albrecht R. Membrane Processes 1989, Wiley.
34. Kaya Y., Aydiner C., Barlas H., Keskinler B. Nanofiltration of single and mixture solutions containing anionics and nonionic surfactants below their critical micelle concentrations (CMCs). J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 282:401-412.
35. Boussu K., Vandecasteele C., Van der Bruggen B. Study of characteristic and the performance of self-made nanoporous polyethersulfone membranes. Polymer 2006, 47(10):3464-3476.
36. Wang K.Y., Chung T.S. The characterization of flat composite nanofiltration membranes and their applications in the separation of Cephalexin. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 247:37-50.
37. Hilal N., AI-Zoubi H., Darwish N.A., Mohammad A.W. Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes using atomic force microscopy. Desalination 2005, 177:187-199.
38. Basar C.A., Karagunduz A., Cakici A., Keskinler B. Removal of surfactants by powdered activated carbon and microfiltration. Water Res. 2004, 38:2117-2124.
39. Hussain A.A., Abashar M.E.E., Al-Mutaz I.S. Influence of ion size on the prediction of nanofiltration membrane systems. Desalination 2007, 214:150-166.
40. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W. Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance-a general assessment. Trans. IChemE Part A 1998, 76:885-893.
41. Einstein A. Investigation on the Theory of the Brownian Movement 1956, Dover. R. Furth (Ed.).
42. Geers C., Gros G. Carbon dioxide transport and carbonic anhydrase in blood and muscle. Physiol. Rev. 2000, 80(2):681-715.
43. Moore W.J. Electrochemistry: conductance and ionic reactions. Physical Chemistry 1962, Prentice-Hall.
44. ISO 7887 International Standard Water Quality-examination and Determination of Color 1994, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
45. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D3049-89-Standard Test Method for Synthetic Anionic Ingredient by Cationic Titration 2003, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA.
46. American Public Health Association (AWWA, APHA) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 20th ed.
47. Porter M.C. Concentration polarization with membrane ultrafiltration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 1972, 11(3):234-248.
48. Boudreau B.P. The diffusive tortuosity of fine-grained unlithified sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1996, 60:3139-3142.
49. Chong T.H., Wong F.S., Fane A.G. Implications of critical flux and cake enhanced osmotic pressure (CEOP) on colloidal fouling in reverse osmosis: experimental observations. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 314:101-111.
50. Agashichev S.P. Modeling the influence of temperature on gel-enhanced concentration polarization in reverse osmosis. Desalination 2009, 236:252-258.
51. Sherwood T.G., Pigford R.L., Wilke C.R. Mass Transfer 1975, McGraw-Hill Inc. B.J. Clark, J.W. Maisel (Eds.).
52. Bungay P.M., Brenner H. The motion of a closely-fitting sphere in a fluid-filled tube. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 1973, 1:25-56.
53. Noordman T.R., Wesselingh J.A. Transport of large molecules through membranes with narrow pores. The Maxwell-Stefan description combined with hydrodynamic theory. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 210:227-243.
54. Silva V., Prádanos P., Palacio L., Hernández A. Alternative pore hindrance factors: what one should be used for nanofiltration modelization?. Desalination 2009, 245:606-613.
55. Lanteri Y., Fievet P., Szymczyk A. Evaluation of the steric, electric, and dielectric exclusion model on the basis of salt rejection rate and membrane potential measurements. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 331:148-155.
56. Koyuncu I., Topacik D. Effect of organic ion on the separation of salts by nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 195:247-263.
57. Benítez F.J., Acero J.L., Leal A.I., González M. The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162:1438-1445.
58. Benítez F.J., Acero J.L., Real F.J., García C. Nanofiltration processes applied to the removal of phenyl-ureas in natural waters. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 165:714-723.
59. Fersi C., Gzara L., Dhahbi M. Flux decline study for textile wastewater treatment by membrane processes. Desalination 2009, 244:321-332.
60. Danis U., Aydiner C. Investigation of process performance and fouling mechanisms in micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of nickel-contaminated waters. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162:577-587.